HI Varrin7
you link doesn't work for me
Could you please upload it to imageshack.us... or something like that?
Thanks


you link doesn't work for me


• USA, New York July 25, 1959; Irondequoit, New York. 1 p.m. Witness: technical illustrator W.D. Neva. One thin, crescent moon-shaped object with a small white dome in the center, flew at tremendous speed for 5-10 seconds.
IN THE AUDE, IT WAS YESTERDAY IN THE SKY OF ESPERAZA
Carcassonne. -- A new U.F.O. was observed on a hill close to Espéranza (the Aude), by three residents of the area Monday evening at approximately 09:30 p.m., whereas they came out of a nearby house where they were watching television. Mr. and Mrs. Toscano and their 15 year old son, saw on the hill, 100 meters in front of them, an orange gleam in the shape of a crescent. One moment they believed to see the moon then went for the obviousness. This source of light could by no means be explained.
This appearance is not without recalling that observed the day before in the evening by several residents of Montreal, and even from a gendarme called for help (see "Midi Libre" for this Tuesday February 26), Mr. Calmet in particular, had perfectly distinguished the phosphorescent crescent but in his case this form surmounted a luminous ball.
The observation of Montreal was of a rare duration, nearly 2 hours. That of Espéraza, less than 10 minutes. It is not excluded that the two luminous phenomena observed 30 km away and a day of interval have the same origin.
As in Montreal, search and the analyses of ground remained vain in Espéraza.
The ufologists of the Aude - increasingly numerous - now have something to work on.
25 March 1974 20:20
Esperaza, France
Several cars pursue crescent moon-shaped object that flies to the west. Photos taken.
An object was observed and photographed. It moved with a falling-leaf motion. One orange crescent-shaped object was observed by several male witnesses on a highway for 120 minutes (Audouy, R).


) Originally posted by Varrin7
reply to post by internos
it looks similar to what I saw, though it was thicker than the on in the picture, and also brighter. Then again, maybe the object in the photo is thicker than it seems in the picture, as some camera functions, such as auto-focus, could have possibly disstorted the image.