law of conservation of energy=God, page 1

In short, the law of conservation of energy states that energy can not be created or destroyed, it can only be changed from one form to another or transferred from one body to another, but the total amount of energy remains constant (the same).

en.wikipedia.org...
now let me give you scientific proof of a god.

God has always existed......Hmmmm so has energy
Energy can't not die...it only changes form..hmmmmm sounding like god to me folk's.

the alpha and omega.

without energy there would be nothing....
we owe all of existence to energy....
planets star's...air..water..EVERYTHING.

now can we all be happy...

I will carry you. I will be with you till the end of days,
Energy is always with us but can never be seen.
see my point or shall i go on lol

energy is god and god is energy.
thus scientific proof shows there is a god...
a creator of all life and everything.Energy....

So now it's up to mankind to figure out if energy is God himself..
thank you for reading my theory on the proof of existence of god.



[edit on 8-8-2008 by beforetime]

reply to post by riley

---

if nothing existed before matter, what started it off. don't you have to have cause and effect. the bible says God has always existed so that solves that one but if there is no God, then what started/caused energy?

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by riley

---

if nothing existed before matter, what started it off. don't you have to have cause and effect.

Yeah.. but nothing can exist outside space and time; for there to be a "before" requires time.. and therefore space. There are also the multiverse and luckaband theories but given your next statement I doubt you'd be interested..

the bible says God has always existed so that solves that one but if there is no God, then what started/caused energy?

It also says the planet was made in seven days and that humans were made from mud pies. I do not consider the bible to be a scientific resource. funny.. at last someone tries to use actual scientific fact as an argument for god yet when that fails someone comes out with the tired "but the bible says" as though a compilation of religious mythologies can somehow compete against scientific research. If you are going to argue against physics bring more to the table than ye old "but god can exist outside time and space" as that in itself requires for him/it to exist somewhere in it's own reality.

[edit on 13-8-2008 by riley]

reply to post by riley

---

that didn't answer the question of what came before. the universe had a beggining, or do you think that the universe has always existed?

the bible does not say the earth was created in 7 24 hour days, as if you had read it you would note that in genesis 2 vs 4 that all the creative days were lumped into one which suggests that the days mentioned in genesis are unspecified periods of time. don't forget it was only relatively recently in human history that we understood more about the vastness of space and time. The bible was written for everyone to understand and not to impress modern scientists. although not a scientific manual, when the bible does touch on science it is quite accurate e.g. is said the earth was round thousands of years before it was proven and when most people thought it was flat.

reply to post by riley

---

firstly, let us stick to what is known by science today. scientists know that the universe had a begining. The first 'LAW' of thermo dynamics defines that something could not come from nothing. So using what we know and what we can prove scientifically that the universe did not just appear all by itself. All you have are fantasies about multiverses or whatever to get round that. These are not proven or known scientifically. So we are left with 1. God, a spirit being of unlimited power who has always existed, created the universe and everything in it. or 2. science fiction.
Neither can be proved but God sounds more plausible to me.

Secondly, the bible says that the planet and everything on it was created in 6 days. How long is a creative day? I don't know as it doesn't say in the bible. I do know it doesn't mean 24 hour days as later on in genesis is lumps all the creative days into one day which suggests the writer was refering to periods of time. Again can't prove it either way.
Is it not correct that the elements of the human body can be found in the earth? If so then the bible is not wrong in that is it.

All in All it is a faith thing. I have faith that there is a God and he created us. You have faith that eventually, somehow, a field of science will be discovered that can prove that universe did get here by itself and life can start from non-life. Good luck.

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by riley

---

firstly, let us stick to what is known by science today. scientists know that the universe had a begining. The first 'LAW' of thermo dynamics defines that something could not come from nothing.

That would include a god/energy.

So using what we know and what we can prove scientifically that the universe did not just appear all by itself.

Yet you are saying an energy could? you seem to be ignoring this law at your own convenience.

All you have are fantasies about multiverses or whatever to get round that. These are not proven or known scientifically.

Actually these are both einsteins and stephen hawking's fantasies. If you would like to dispute and argue metaphisics with Mr hawkings he has a contact form on his site.. be sure to post a transcript.

So we are left with 1. God, a spirit being of unlimited power who has always existed, created the universe and everything in it. or 2. science fiction.
Neither can be proved but God sounds more plausible to me.

An energy. You seem to want to use the laws of conversion to argue for god but want to ignore the fact that this energy you call 'god' would be ruled by the same laws of physics. Can't have it both ways.

Secondly, the bible says that the planet and everything on it was created in 6 days. How long is a creative day? I don't know as it doesn't say in the bible. I do know it doesn't mean 24 hour days as later on in genesis is lumps all the creative days into one day which suggests the writer was refering to periods of time. Again can't prove it either way.
Is it not correct that the elements of the human body can be found in the earth? If so then the bible is not wrong in that is it.

Santa apparently is able to deliver present to all the little children in the world because he has a really fast slay and because the time differences give him a few extra hours.

[edit on 15-8-2008 by riley]

reply to post by KyoZero

---

Who are you talking to? the scientific theory is true.

a second line justincase.

[edit on 15-8-2008 by riley]

reply to post by riley

---

I did not say that God is energy. The bible says he is a spirit. What is a spirit? How do you determine it's properties?I don't know, do you? So how can you argue that God must obey the laws of physics when you have no idea what his properties are? I believe he created the physical universe and therefore created the laws of physics and is master over them. Can I prove that, no, neither have I ever suggested that I can or anyone else for that matter.
You obviously don't believe in God, fair enough. However, your alternative is still science fiction. It doesn't matter how clever the scientist is, until an idea is proven, it is a fantasy. A fantasy that there seems to be no way of proving any time soon in this case.
Oh and by your last comments I can take it you do agree that the elements of the human body can be found in the earth.

Originally posted by KyoZero
Where is the verifiable truth? Show me a shred of conrete tangible evidence to this and I will be more willing to accept it as real

-Kyo

en.wikipedia.org...
In physics, mass–energy equivalence is the concept that any mass has an associated energy and vice versa. In special relativity this relationship is expressed using the mass–energy equivalence formula

E = mc^2\,

where

* E = energy,
* m = mass,
* c = the speed of light in a vacuum (celeritas),

Two definitions of mass in special relativity may be validly used with this formula. If the mass in the formula is the rest mass, the energy in the formula is called the rest energy. If the mass is the relativistic mass, then the energy is the total energy.

The formula was derived by Albert Einstein, who arrived at it in 1905 in the paper "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy-content?", one of his Annus Mirabilis ("Wonderful Year") Papers.[1] While Einstein was not the first to propose a mass–energy relationship, and various similar formulas appeared before Einstein's theory, Einstein was the first to propose that the equivalence of mass and energy is a general principle, a consequence of the symmetries of space and time.

I have underlined the most relevent points for you [in relation to the laws of conversion].

[edit on 15-8-2008 by riley]

I Am Christ-The Almighty!
  Posted 9 days ago with 12 member flags

The Pope\'s Advice for ATS (and others)
  Posted 15 days ago with 10 member flags

God\'s Judgment on homosexuality.
  Posted 12 days ago with 10 member flags

The Bringer of Light
  Posted 9 days ago with 10 member flags

Christ! My Hero!
  Posted 4 days ago with 9 member flags

WTF just happend to me?
  Posted 2 days ago with 9 member flags

End of the world, You should start paying attention! WW3
  Posted 8 days ago with 8 member flags

Van Gogh\'s "Starry Night"
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: