Originally posted by djerwulfe
I think the answer is in the earlier posts.
Not many links with facts in your other posts, just your opinion and an article that outright spits bias to the reader's face. However, I respect
your opinion even if I find it ridiculous.
Originally posted by djerwulfe
But, Georgia wants to be NATO and Russia doesn't want them to be.
Yes, I think everyone can agree on that. However just because this fact has played a key role in tensions between Russia and Georgia, we cannot simply
ignore other facts. I'm talking about the facts that I listed in my post, and the one fact that dominates every other argument >>------->> Russian
troops were killed in the Georgian attack. First and foremost Russia is retaliating. This kind of a thing cannot go unpunished by any nation which
respects itself.
Now you can name all the benifits that Russia gets from this, and you can name them as many times as you want and say that Russia is really in for
matterial reasons. The truth of the matter is the conqueror imposes whatever he wishes upon the conquered. If Russia wins (which it certainly will)
you can expect it to take everything it wishes, as anyone else would. Every nation has done this in war. Just because there are material and political
benifits to a conflict does not mean they are the only things in play.
Originally posted by djerwulfe
I didn't know that Ossetia actually had a distinct language. Interesting and good to know, BUT, if every linguistic group was entitled to having a
sovereign nation carved out for them, well, that's just silly.
So its safe to conclude you do not have much experience with this side of the world do you. The East has very different values compared to the west,
however I always thought every nationed valued it's language. I understand that as people move overseas and start different lives they forget their
culture more and more as they become mixed in a sea of different nationalities, and thus the concept of culture generaly deteriorates. You must
understand that speaking a different language means having a whole seperate chapter in history, and is basis enough to demand to be seperate. Now you
can demand all you want, doesn't mean that its gonig to come granted on a silver platter, but it is a fair argument and no, it's not silly. But the
roots of the Ossetian/Georgian issue are not as simple as language differences alone by far.
Originally posted by djerwulfe
There are places with hundreds of language groups within a few square miles.
Africa: you'd a have 5 acre nations if a distinct language qualified as a National identity.
Yes, you should also know that in Africa these tribes are represented in their goverments, and their culture is respected. Atleast the UN does what it
can to see to that.
Originally posted by djerwulfe
I'm sorry, but I have to side with the group that champions free markets and political tolerance, historically.
No need to apologize. Although political tolorence is an overstatement.
Originally posted by djerwulfe
Um, does anybody remember the USSR? Stalin? Khrushchev?
If the Soviets were so benign, why didn't western Europe join the Soviet Union?
Why yes, I've heard of it. I live in it's aftermath actually. I can see how Stalin can fit into the topic - he was Georgian. Krushchev was from
Ukraine so are you hinting at what I said about Ukraine's arms sales to Georgia there??

And you most likely hold "Russia" and "USSR" as
synonims don't you? On a more serious note - What on earth do they really have to do with this? And Western Europe didn't want to join the USSR
because it was THE USSR damn it, how hard is that? Can you just take my word for it when I tell you Russia is not the USSR, and this will spare us
both many a page in this thread?
Originally posted by djerwulfe
Was not Putin a ranking party member and KGB bigwig?
What? "He got better?" He's a totally different person now?
No, he didn't get better...matter of fact he hasn't changed a bit. Tell me do you interprite the KGB as some evil twisted organization, who's sole
criteria on the application for was to be brutal and cruel? You really should do some reading on these things. You just might find out that there were
in fact decent and intelligent people, and many of them, who served in the KGB (I have met many).
Originally posted by djerwulfe
If a country isn't recognized as existing by the international community, then it doesn't exist.
So Kosovo and Taiwan don't exist either? Or is the "international community" simply the US, Canada, England, France and Germany?
Originally posted by djerwulfe
Otherwise, as of this moment I declare my backyard "Djerwulfia." It has a distinct culture and history and should be able to draft its own
constitution. It isn't subject to US law anymore because the majority of US citizens don't share my views.
May I reserve the right to be the first tourist then? Lol actually go for it. Last time a portion of the US tried to split guess what happened?
***GASP*** The American civil war! Even befor when America wanted independance from the King of England guess what happened? ***GASP*** War yet
again.
But really, do start that own country thing of yours. I haven't sh*t myself with laughter from watching the news since Bush finally learned to give
speeches properly...more or less...after 8 years



. Mind you I wouldn't be laughing at you, it just reminds me of that Family Guy
episode. I would pay to see that happen in real life hehe.
Regards,
Maestro
PS: I understand your opinion, but an opinion is only that.
i