|
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 11:55 PM by UFOTECH
|
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
I see what you mean. All of these death mongers are all new members. Perhaps it is the start of a death and war is good gang of posters.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 11:56 PM by WeNeedAWar
|
Originally posted by Scorched Earth
reply to post by WeNeedAWar
I am not on your level. Nuking countries is the easy, yet stupid way out.
I await the cries of racism, but lets be realistic here: Africa is basically useless. Not in any way due to the race of its inhabitants, but they are
the planets welfare child. Simply stopping all aid to that continent would do wonders to reduce the population.
Let China do as they wish with their one child policy. I personally believe its a good idea, but our Constitution forbids that policy here. Since it
does so, the only way to reduce our national population is to halt all forms of immigration by whatever means necessary.
Guy immigration has nothing to do with this. This isnt about borders this is about our world. Yes the Africans are inferior and like all other
species should be let be. The earth will finish them without the help of war. The Chinese and Asians in general need some good depopulation.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 11:56 PM by SpartanKingLeonidas
|
Originally posted by WeNeedAWar
Originally posted by Scorched Earth
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
It's called seeing what you want to see, not what I actually said. I never advocated war. I simply think all forms of aid must be stopped and we must
let nature take its course.
The survival of the planet, and humankind depends on it.
Good point. That could be another step in our quest of world depopulation. Quit giving aid and helping the world. Let them fend for themselves.
Good idea. Its good to have someone on my sick level.
That's the most absurd reason to go to war, to "save the planet" is just your sick and twisted way of promoting hatred and needless death.
I'm wasting time posting here, because I'm debating war with someone who has no value of human life, and on top of that, I can not promote your
point of view by bumping the thread up any longer.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 11:58 PM by WeNeedAWar
|
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
Think of it as like when America Nuked Japan to save American lives but on a bigger scale. Kill many people to save the human race.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:00 AM by SpartanKingLeonidas
|
Originally posted by UFOTECH
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
I see what you mean. All of these death mongers are all new members. Perhaps it is the start of a death and war is good gang of posters.
Agreed, "posting gangs" are strictly against Terms and Conditions of the website.
I'm on here solo, and continue to stay that way, and not posting here again, because I know it's another idiotic attempt to draw intelligent people
into defending their views.
I've got better things to do with the time I spend on here.
Originally posted by WeNeedAWar
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
Think of it as like when America Nuked Japan to save American lives but on a bigger scale. Kill many people to save the human race.
Yeah, and Truman was an idiot. The war was all but already over at that point, he only did that to make a ! on the end of the war to show Stalin how
powerful America was at the end. Drawing Stalin into the needless Cold War.
Spew your pro-war, pro-Nazi, pro-Government crap all you want.
[edit on 8-8-2008 by SpartanKingLeonidas]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:00 AM by LiquidCrystalz
|
Originally posted by WeNeedAWar
We need a war. The fact is the world cannot sustain itself with the current population. We need a lot of people to die either by war or by a virus.
If not we will all die anyways because we will run out of resources. I think we will get this war and millions will die. I think this would be
great. If we can get the population down down around 500 million or so this would be great for the world. What do you guys think?
Since you think it would be so great for a lot of people to die by war or a virus, which line are you getting in? Are you including yourself in that
6.1 billion that you want to die?? This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:05 AM by bobbylove321
|
The world being over populated is a big hoax. No such thing. You know they could raise every building into 20-30 stories easily right? That's another
few million people in a few hundred buildings. Overpopulated....yeah ok
As for resources, theres TONS. Experts have said earth could sustain life of 50 billion for 1000 years.
Research some.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:09 AM by Scorched Earth
|
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
Yeah, and Truman was an idiot. The war was all but already over at that point, he only did that to make a ! on the end of the war to show Stalin how
powerful America was at the end. Drawing Stalin into the needless Cold War.
Are you insane?
Not really a fan of history are you?
The war wasn't "all but over" at the time we hit em hard.
Wow, try studying just a little bit.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:21 AM by pweagle
|
Hi, hi you guys doing tonight?
just came across this thread tonight and thought I might pipe in some food for thought.
If you think that the world is over populated and there simply isn't enough resources to sustain everyone and all the little creatures, please spare
me the crap in the hat. Its a matter or resource management. It has nothing to do with resources but consumables. Think about it...rather just listen,
The amount of resources are mis-used and pillaged for the few and its not equally distributed.
The Earth is rich and can provide for everyone. People just have to stop thinking like this. Instead of being scared and spreading lies use that brain
of yours to come up with a positive solution rather then non-sense, please brother.
Think better of yourself and others and not just your self.
You are not think about the future of humanity because if you really believe what you are saying then you should have no hesitation to further your
cause by sacrificing yourself to make your point ever so clear.
As long as there is resources there will be people, even if there wasn't we'd find it. didn't you see that movie dooms day? Anyways Rethink about
what you say and rethink what it means to you and the rest of us.
Show some love for your fellow man not hate, there is enough of that going around now a days.
peace
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:25 AM by Magnivea
|
Originally posted by WeNeedAWar
We need a war. The fact is the world cannot sustain itself with the current population. We need a lot of people to die either by war or by a virus.
If not we will all die anyways because we will run out of resources. I think we will get this war and millions will die. I think this would be
great. If we can get the population down down around 500 million or so this would be great for the world. What do you guys think?
Would your
name happen to be Dr. Eric R. Pianka?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:29 AM by non-living
|
I wouldn't consider that an option, if our race is doomed, we will have to face our problems, not take the easy way out and be greedy for our race.
If it's time for an end, I think we should let it be. Besides, if we properly use our resources, then we wouldn't have to face these problems in the
future.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:35 AM by jtown
|
i reckon you watch to much tv sponsored by the one world order or you are getting your info from fools there is more than enough room on this planet
for all what we have to get rid of is the greedy those that want more than there shear are the scum that must go,those that worship money are the ones
that have to go those that think money gives them the right to live over the poor.i know if i start to starve because of the greedy i will eat the
rich.i wonder do you think you will be part of the 500,000,000 if you do i might see you at my table one day
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:41 AM by Sly62659
|
One way or another, I suppose it will happen/needs to happen. Take a look at a new disease every few years, there will be one that we won't be able
to fight and just like that, depopulation. and to be honest to all of you who ask the poster to step up and be the first, if it were me and my card
was up, then i would accept that. what more can you do?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:47 AM by SonicInfinity
|
This was the first image that popped in my head when I read the topic title:
World depopulation is something that needs to be done, but it has to be done with steady means. If everybody was to die all of a sudden, imagine the
effect it would have. Without all those people taking in oxygen and breathing out carbon dioxide, what would happen? Would all the people just live on
one continent and let the other ones turn to wastelands?
The people at the top don't want to save the world, they want POWER. If they wanted to save the human race, they would be feeding us programs about
safe sex or coming up with new methods to prevent pregnancy instead of running sex ads 24/7. A step-by-step world depopulation plan spanning 100 years
to decrease the population by say, 10-25%, wouldn't be too bad, but just decreasing it by billions in a matter of weeks will have dire consequences.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:54 AM by Drewdatt
|
reply to post by WeNeedAWar
Stop watching tv son
The planet can support much more than that, probably double what we are now. Take a walk around the planet, turn off the tv, the world is much much
bigger than you think.
We have the available technology to change the way we live with this planet.
By bringing war you endanger the very planet in which you claim to be wanting to save.
War is about ritual killing, money and power.
Grow up
Peace
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:56 AM by In nothing we trust
|
Originally posted by Scorched Earth
Natural disasters would be the easiest action to take in an effort to depopulate certain areas, but we just can't count on those as being reliable.
Really the best method of depopulating the planet would be biological warfare.
Natural disasters are too unrealiable as you state and regular warfare is messy and labor intensive.
Virus are fast effective killers and the best choice. And best of all an anti-virus serum can be synthasized for the choosen survivors.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:56 AM by Scorched Earth
|
reply to post by Drewdatt
It isn't about there not being enough room, its about sustainability. the planet simply cant support 6, 8, or 10 billion people, let alone your claim
of double the current numbers.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:59 AM by krestan
|
Originally posted by WeNeedAWar
Its not that I dont value human life. Im thinking about the future of the human race. If we dont depopulate fast we will use all our resources and
all humans will die. Take one for the team as they say.
OK, but you go first!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |