SWAT guns down innocent dogs of town mayor, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 02:47 PM by EverythingYouDespise
Didn't a young lab just murder a baby last month or so?



reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 03:17 PM by Grafilthy
reply to post by deltaboy




You know I remember seeing a pic of the Mayor and his wife walking in a park with the dogs wearing a muzzle I think. Not sure if it was a muzzle. Could be a collar like harness.

Nope....those are called "gentle leaders" they help train a dog without having to jerk them around. I had them for dogs I trained in the past.


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 03:19 PM by Grafilthy
reply to post by spookjr


Dammit spook.....you have to be mindful of your anger
they want you to lose control.....that is how they find you.


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 05:18 PM by chise61
reply to post by EverythingYouDespise



Here ya go again, trying to derail a thread with your personal beliefs about dogs. You know full well that the case about the 8 week old baby being killed by a six week old lab puppy is still under investigation. The cause of that baby's death has not been detirmined yet.


This thread is about an illegal raid on someone's house and the murder of their dogs, not dog attacks.

And yes if one of the dogs was shot in the back it is relevant as it would show that the dog was not facing the officers and therefore was not posing any threat to the officers.

[edit on 8/8/08 by chise61]

[edit on 8/8/08 by chise61]


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 11:11 PM by chise61
reply to post by michial



The town has it's own police department, however it was the sherriff's (county police) department that raided the house. They should have made the local police department aware of the raid before hand, as well as involve them in it, and yes had they done that the situation probably would not have occured.

The "war on drugs" is a crock of crap, especially since our own goverment is involved in drug trafficking.


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 11:36 PM by spookjr
reply to post by XTexan

Right,yeah,lawsuits.... That'll really make a difference. Perhaps an example of the all hallowed second amendment....


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 01:54 AM by EnlightenUp
Originally posted by Distractions4Nothing
Seems to me love of animals is distracting just about everyone on this thread from the real story, which is this business of drugs being mailed to the guy's house.

The dead dogs are sad and all, but the idea that you can get someone in this much trouble just by mailing an illegal substance to their house is what I find truly disturbing.


For me it's simply the entire drug war condition.

What is done when entering which includes besides shooting pets without question as standard procedure:

Not announcing themselves as law enforcement which can lead someone to think they're under attack. As a result they may rightfully attempt to defend themselves which may lead not only to injury or death of the one being raided but for the officers as well. This can result in the tnjury or death of innocents when the wrong house is raided or others not involved happen to be in the house. Sometimes older couples have heart attacks. Infants have been killed in raids. It should be evident they don't investigate the situation very carefully.

The triflingly small amount of circumstantial evidence required for entry:

Often others that have been given deals to rat out someone that may have been involved with the person in some way in exchange for lighter sentences. It motivates the informant to make any association they can no matter how tenuous. The word of anyone will do. Sometimes it's simply vidictiveness. Other times no more evidence than a seed in the trash was required. Sometimes a only a few plants for private use (which of course leads to charges related to dealing). One time I recall the pot in question turned out to be a Japanese maple tree.

The fact that they may enter at all:

I'm throughly against the invasion of freedom and privacy that is prohibition especially with such an incredible zeal for convictions.


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 02:51 AM by gluetrap
reply to post by EverythingYouDespise



Dogs can not be easily replaced, that is the most outlandish thing I have heard in a long time, and I just read the national health care thread so that is saying a lot. I realize that not everyone loves animals, certainly not the way I do. But have you ever even causally known a good dog?

It is widely thought in some academic circles that the mutually beneficial early relationships between our human ancestors and wolves and early domesticated canines was the very thing that has made us human. the things we learned from the caninds methods of cooperative hunting, their complicated and evolving pack structure, as well as the increased protein intake due to the better hunting results enabled humans to rise above the primate pack and become the entities we are today.
So while you think so lowly of our four legged companions, take some time to think on the possible impact they have on your very existence.

A dogs instinct is to protects its home and pack; often at all costs, they were innocent lives lost in this chaos.


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 01:59 PM by punkinworks
I hope the mayor and his family sue the pants off of FEDEX.
It was their own internal dogs that detected the package in the first place, in arizona.
And from what I'm reading it doesnt sound like the Feds were notified, because the raid should have been a DEA operation, since the package crossed state lines. The local police(sherrifs dept) should have had no jurisdiction.
It's not just the police but the judges who issue warrents for what ever the police want, with asking any questions.
2 years ago, in my rather good neighborhood, he sherrifs dept kicked in the door of a family of 4 and muscled them around a little before realizing they had just made total asses of themselves.
You see their warrent was for a large scale marijuana growing operation.
What was their evidence, complaints or tips from neighbors, NO, people being seeing carring in large amounts of fertilizers, NO, purchases of HID lighting, NO, people coming and going at all hrs, NO .
The evidance used ,was that their electric bill had gone up $150 in one month in the summer, Oh yah it gets well over 105 degrees here every day.
You see some self appointed depidy dawg at the utilities took it upon himself to root out the evils of indoor weed growing, by scanning fro customers that had a 200% increase over the previous year in the same month.
So his little pgm spit out this address, and he called gthe local sherrifs dept and told them he had a for sure grow house. They got a warrent based on the info and came in like storm troopers.
Only problem was that the house was vacant the summer before and had no electric billing, so any amount would have triggered his little robo-cop.
I think that the sherrifs dept and the utilitity quietly may have provided some sort of restitution to the family.
The old sherrif, who was a pretty good guy, made a public apology as did the utility, and they announced that they would no longer use their systems to provide unwarranted searches of private citizens, YAH RIGHT.

Oh NO DEAD BATTERY
SEE YA
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 68 replies