Anti-War Website Operator Threatened By Armed Thugs (Give this as much attention as possible!!!), page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 60 times


reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 10:15 PM by DarksDeception
reply to post by housegroove23



I Totaly agree that this information, is very important to listen to! Its the individuals choice to accept, deny, or just keeping the information in mind!

It truely is very important info, even if from Alex Jones! He is not all crap you know!

So, I for one, will take heed of the possabilities now!

GOOD WORK OP!


reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 10:40 PM by TXMACHINEGUNDLR
reply to post by housegroove23



I feel no pitty for those left wing loosers. Sooner or later if you keep poking the right wind nuts they are going to "poke" back.



reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 11:52 PM by SonicInfinity
reply to post by NovusOrdoMundi



I'm not in the mood to argue back-and-forth with you like I did in the Tony Snow topic a while back (which was eventually closed thanks to all the disrespect and misconduct). The people of ATS can judge this however they please. If they choose to believe the article, they can, and if they don't trust Alex and want more proof, they can do that too. If you wish to continue arguing about if it's fake or not, you can, but as for me, I've said what I wanted to say. Don't worry, I'll let you have the last word (or last emoticon - whichever you prefer).


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 12:38 AM by NovusOrdoMundi
Originally posted by ObamasLoveChild
For those of you that have posted that 'you don't believe the government would go this far'


There is a big difference between saying the government would not go this far and requesting proof of the government allegedly going this far.

We all know they can and will, at times, go as far as they need to go. The end justifies the means.

However, that does not mean take at face value everything that they are accused of doing. You cannot simply take advantage of "the end justifies the means" and manufacture stories of threats and theft without providing an ounce of proof.

I'm still waiting for someone to point out where the proof is in this article. To this point, no one has shown me it, yet people push forward as if its the truth.

Are we here to learn the truth? Or are we hear to fantasize about the big bad government being after us, simply because someone on the Internet said so?

To question this article doesn't automatically mean one is saying the government never does things like this. To question this article simply means there needs to be PROOF presented.

As I have said MANY times, NO proof has been presented whatsoever. Instead, people must resort to calling others COINTELPRO and warmongers.

How about anyone who believes this story offer up some proof for the rest of us misguided individuals who haven't been blessed by Alex Jones to be able to see the invisible proof hidden in between the lines?

If you're all about getting this information out, how about informing those of us who don't seem to get it?

Thats my challenge to you. Prove this story is true.


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 01:26 AM by Iblis
Originally posted by SonicInfinity
reply to
post by Slothrop



You obviously don't know how the world works or how many times Alex Jones has been threatened by the government. He's been arrested by the government before on many occasions, but he was released every time.

reply to post by Iblis



Your post confuses me. It seems to be relevant to the topic, yet you're acting as if this topic is a "debate" topic. I'm not here to debate, I'm here to discuss. If you think Alex is lying, then all we have to do is wait on time. Time will give you the "proof" that you need. If you can't wait on time, then I can't wait on you to wait on me.

[edit on 8/7/2008 by SonicInfinity]


Alex has been arrested many times for breaking the law. Illegal protests, protesting without warrant, etc. Being arrested and being released has no barring on anything regarding a person's character. It's not as though he's on the Nigerian ballot -- This is America, and despite what the majority of people here would like to think, they're not the same.

This topic became a debate when you posted it -- A discussion, an argument. In fact it became one after the first reply when the veracity of this was put into question.



reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 01:36 AM by harvib
Originally posted by GhostR1der
Originally posted by harvib
reply to
post by ZindoDoone




Aren't individuals in the military fighting to protect our freedoms?

[edit on 7-8-2008 by harvib]


Umm.. war in a country which has done nothing to you is not fighting for freedom. It's illegal and wrong. How the hell did you get to the conclusions that it's freedom?? You been eating enough freedom fries or what... damn. Under Saddam at least the country was stable, they also had running water and electricity. Sure a few of the unjust restrictions in their life (Saddams goons etc) have been lifted but most are worse off with the mass destruction and unrest that has been bought upon the country than before.

You are fighting for oil and control and profits, pure and simple, I pity the servicemen/servicewomen and general population who are stuck in Iraq/Afghanistan with all the govt propaganda washing over them. I hope they come home ASAP safely.


This is ridiculous. Does anybody read the entire post? Or is there just a lack of comprehension. For the second time to the second person I will say you miss the point of my post. I will explain since context obviously means nothing.

Some individuals in our military believe they are fighting for our freedoms. Right, wrong, or indifferent that is what they believe. If you would read the post I was responding to and my entire response you would hopefully understand my point.

A stepfather of a serviceman was stating that he condones the use of violence against people who talk poorly of the war. His point was that his stepson is fighting for our freedom and in the meantime there are those that would speak poorly of the war he believes to be a fight for freedom.

I understand there are those that believe the war has nothing to do with protecting our freedoms and to that I would agree. However the point I was making is how an individual that believes he is fighting for our freedoms would feel when he discovers his own stepfather condones the use of violence against individuals expressing the freedoms he believes to be fighting for.

Maybe I wasn't clear or maybe you didn't read the whole post. Either way I hope I have successfully made my point.


[edit on 8-8-2008 by harvib]


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 02:12 AM by counterterrorist
Originally posted by Justice11
Heres a reality check;
We were hit by Al-quaida on 9/11
and weve been at war ever since.


duh. Mohammed Atta was working for CIA -- it looks like al Qaeda (the Moslem Brotherhood of Hitler's Arab Nazis which was funded and trained and equipped by MI-6 & CIA & BND i.e. Fed & Bank of England & Bundesbank) -- may not even exist ...it's just CIA/MI-6 double-speak while they genocide the world and capture the heroin market.

Atta was not even an Islamic fundamentalist -- he was a Swiss-German previously representing the U.S. and Germany in a foreign exchange program, and 7 of his pilot friends were German. They WERE ALL ALREADY PILOTS, the reason they were "students" at a "flight school" was because it was easy to get student visas. Several of the terrorist pilots trained at U.S. military flight schools.

Atta hung out at a flight school in Florida that had been busted for trafficking 40 kilos of heroin and associated with CIA heroin trafficking.

I'm putting another url here that documents Barry Seal's involvement w/David Ferrie & Lee Harvey Oswald in southern Florida -- Seal was CIA's major heroin trafficker before he was assassinated by Oliver North's folks. Oliver North then became the biggest CIA heroin and cocaine trafficker, with his ally Monzer al-Kassar.

Heroin also dovetails w/Mohamed Atta, who apparently also heroin trafficker out of South Florida who one of 911 terrorists & trained 911 pilots (info in following url documented in Daniel Hopsicker's website below)
www.truthalliance.net... implication: JFK murder & WTC/911 involved Fed/Bank of England/Bundesbank heroin trafficking & related money laundering --

videos ... WTC/911 terrorist Mohamed Atta's blond girlfriend gives exclusive interviews www.abovetopsecret.com...

Daniel Hopsicker's, 'Mohamed Atta & Venice Flying Circus' video trailer www.madcowprod.com...

Another of his video's: www.madcowprod.com...

To see how Mohammed Atta fits into: "MOHAMMED ATTA … at TERRORIST MOTEL-- GOP & UNDERGROUND REICH & WTC/911 & MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD & 2012", go to www.abovetopsecret.com... --
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
--then
JOHN O'NEILL tracked bin Laden for years before WTC/911 -- but BUSH & FBI would not let him proceed. There's an excellent 2-hour one-man show url here at this posting
www.abovetopsecret.com...

In a nutshell, it looks like Enron is more responsible for WTC/911 than al Qaeda, since Enron was financing the Moslem Brotherhood, as well as CIA. It all comes down to the interlocking directorate of the fed and bank of england and bundesbank.

Also, the day before WTC/911, the Pentagon announced it was missing 4 trillion dollars.

Please direct any questions or comments to my post, "for neo-nazi holocaust deniers' -- NOT HERE AT THIS LOCATION -- I was just responding to Justice11's 'reality check' with a real reality check.

The point being, we're over in Iraq securing the Afghanistani heroin trade and planning coups in the Fed/City of London march against China in their outer provinces, where today's news says the "Islamic Chinese" want independence.



[edit on 8-8-2008 by counterterrorist]


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 02:28 AM by Fulcrum29
Originally posted by counterterrorist
Originally posted by Justice11
Heres a reality check;
We were hit by Al-quaida on 9/11
and weve been at war ever since.


duh. Mohammed Atta was working for CIA -- it looks like al Qaeda (the Moslem Brotherhood of Hitler's Arab Nazis which was funded and trained and equipped by MI-6 & CIA & BND i.e. Fed & Bank of England & Bundesbank) -- may not even exist ...it's just CIA/MI-6 double-speak while they genocide the world and capture the heroin market.

Atta was not even an Islamic fundamentalist -- he was a Swiss-German previously representing the U.S. and Germany in a foreign exchange program, and 7 of his pilot friends were German. They WERE ALL ALREADY PILOTS, the reason they were "students" at a "flight school" was because it was easy to get student visas. Several of the terrorist pilots trained at U.S. military flight schools.

Atta hung out at a flight school in Florida that had been busted for trafficking 40 kilos of heroin and associated with CIA heroin trafficking.

I'm putting another url here that documents Barry Seal's involvement w/David Ferrie & Lee Harvey Oswald in southern Florida -- Seal was CIA's major heroin trafficker before he was assassinated by Oliver North's folks. Oliver North then became the biggest CIA heroin and cocaine trafficker, with his ally Monzer al-Kassar.

Heroin also dovetails w/Mohamed Atta, who apparently also heroin trafficker out of South Florida who one of 911 terrorists & trained 911 pilots (info in following url documented in Daniel Hopsicker's website below)
www.truthalliance.net... implication: JFK murder & WTC/911 involved Fed/Bank of England/Bundesbank heroin trafficking & related money laundering --

videos ... WTC/911 terrorist Mohamed Atta's blond girlfriend gives exclusive interviews www.abovetopsecret.com...

Daniel Hopsicker's, 'Mohamed Atta & Venice Flying Circus' video trailer www.madcowprod.com...

Another of his video's: www.madcowprod.com...

To see how Mohammed Atta fits into: "MOHAMMED ATTA … at TERRORIST MOTEL-- GOP & UNDERGROUND REICH & WTC/911 & MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD & 2012", go to www.abovetopsecret.com... --
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
--then
JOHN O'NEILL tracked bin Laden for years before WTC/911 -- but BUSH & FBI would not let him proceed. There's an excellent 2-hour one-man show url here at this posting
www.abovetopsecret.com...

In a nutshell, it looks like Enron is more responsible for WTC/911 than al Qaeda, since Enron was financing the Moslem Brotherhood, as well as CIA. It all comes down to the interlocking directorate of the fed and bank of england and bundesbank.

Also, the day before WTC/911, the Pentagon announced it was missing 4 trillion dollars.

Please direct any questions or comments to my post, "for neo-nazi holocaust deniers' -- NOT HERE AT THIS LOCATION -- I was just responding to Justice11's 'reality check' with a real reality check.

The point being, we're over in Iraq securing the Afghanistani heroin trade and planning coups in the Fed/City of London march against China in their outer provinces, where today's news says the "Islamic Chinese" want independence.



[edit on 8-8-2008 by counterterrorist]

You sir are amazing. I would star and flag your post 100 times were it possible!



reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 03:22 AM by Dienekes
Originally posted by counterterrorist

Don't hesitate to call a murderer a murderer.
The Iraqi civilians have been
murdered by U.S. soldiers ... clear and simple.

It's interesting you say that, because last I checked, there are more "Innocent civilians" killing more innocent civilians in Iraq/Afghanistan than there are U.S. Troops. Considering that the current rules of engagement for our troops over there include that our troops can't shoot at anything until they have had three shots fired at them and they are completely sure of their target. The majority of Innocent civilian casualties are being caused by Radical Muslims that decide they want to take a decent sum of explosives, strap it to their chest and detonate in a crowded marketplace or bus. (Which aren't the U.S Troops). Sure, U.S. Airstrikes and gunfire has killed innocent civilians, unfortunately, that's what happens in wars, people die.

To be clear though, I am skeptical about the war in Iraq, I disagree with the way it's been fought. Another thing, is that one of you guys posted a link to a site bent on freeing a soldier that went AWOL. When your buddy signed up, he pretty much signed his life away. It's like picking up a rattle snake and letting him bite you then blaming it entirely on the rattlesnake when you begin dying.

Remember, that the government only has as much power as you give it. For the most part, We the People still hold the power, although, it is headed down a bad direction.

One last quick thing,

no, warmongers are not entitled to an opinion because they're reptilian animals with room temperature IQs. If you don't know who THEY are, I suggest you start reading more ATS posts until you can express a truthful understanding instead of just posting deriding opinion.


So which sounds more "Nazi and Neo-Nazi"? That quote, (I recommend substituting the word warmongers for Jews and homosexuals in the above quote) or someone giving their rightful opinion and disagreeing with an accusation that has very little proof? CounterTerrorist? Aha, I like definition number 4 in the good ol' Webster's dictionary for Terror- a very annoying or unmanageable person, esp. a child;nuisance;pest. I think you fit that description quite well! Mr. CounterTerror(ist)

[edit on 8-8-2008 by Dienekes]

[edit on 8-8-2008 by Dienekes]


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 04:27 AM by zorgon
Two whole quotes in a row and only one even had a one liner
Guys your new please have a look at the T&C will ya?


To housegroove...

Hey long time no see I thought maybe "they" got you

As to the "thugs" If they are real I would guess they are more likely zealots than agents... As Ignorant Ape says they could shut you down easily heck all they would have to do is confiscate your computer (under homeland security act) and 'find' some kiddie porn or sensitive document and its game over... and no one would doubt it because as a CT its obvious he would have that 'stuff' on his computer...



As to what our service men are fighting for in Irag...

The "war" in Iraq was to liberate the Iraquis from Saddam... we were fighting for THEIR freedom not OURS
We are not AT WAR with Iraq... Iraq is not attacking the USA

Why are we still there?

Iraqi government expected to have $79 billion surplus
www.abovetopsecret.com...

While YOU shell out at the pumps and your tax dollars...

Well if they have a surplus perhaps its time the Pentagon send them a bill for "services rendered" and give OUR pocket book a rest...

How about this? Is THIS what your sons and daughters are dying for?

Halliburton, and Dick Cheney, are killing our troops
www.abovetopsecret.com...



Halliburton Watch!
www.halliburtonwatch.org...


9-12-2003
High Payments to Halliburton for Fuel in Iraq
www.abovetopsecret.com...

29-6-2005
Haliburton Hearing? Feeding our troops expired food?
www.abovetopsecret.com...

CNN
KBR Electrocutes a Dozen U.S. Troops, One Green Beret Dead



MSNBC
Haliburton and KBR are screwing our troops!



US Troops in Iraq talk about Halliburton & KBR



Halliburton provided contaminated water to Soldiers



Haliburton delivers US troops dangerous water



Do you people really think its our FREEDOM we are 'fighting' for over there?


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 09:11 AM by franspeakfree
reply to post by NovusOrdoMundi



I am a little confused here, your first post sounded like you were a COINTELPRO but your avatar shows that you are a believer of the NWO and that you are your own alliance in being prepared for it? Why unleash a tirade on to the OP when this is something you believe in?


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 10:14 AM by ZindoDoone
reply to post by harvib



Actualy NO, you did not interpret what I said correctly. I said that theres more going on in both Afganistan and Iraq then so called murdering of civilians. There are more men and women building, teaching and giving medical treatment to the populace than are fighting. The logistics of this FACT is lost on most folks here. I have heard said here that I 'Have not put my ass on the line'. How little that butthead that said it knows. What I said also in my very first post is that with the attitudes of some here and on websites like the one mentioned about the troops, that I understand why some that have come back and actualy know the truth might pay the moron on that site a visit. When you impune the actions of so many with only the knowledge that is gleened from the MSM and a bunch of socialist teachers in our schools, its no wonder that they may get a mouth full of fist when they spew the garbage they do. I totaly understand that war is not the best of answers but if you realy believe you can act otherwise with the people we are dealing with, good luck in the next few years. Its going to be a bumpy ride.

Zindo


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 10:18 AM by Scurvy
I think people are misinterpretting what NovusOrdoMundi is trying to say. He is not saying that what you have posted Is false. He just wants proof as these are very strong allegations. I'm completely against the war in Iraq and many actions the US government has taken but I'm with Novus. You can't just post this on ATS and take the word of a shock jockey as the be all and end all.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that a privately operated website is not sufficient evidence to prove what you are claiming. Much like if you write a book report in school they won't accept private websites as legitimate references as they are opinions NOT facts. If you can find a reputable news outlet or some other form of backing (legal documents) I'll be just as outraged as you are that this is occurring.

harvib's post has been misconstrued as well. He was telling ZindoDoone that his position on the matter is contradictory. Zindo's stepson is fighting for the freedoms of these shock jocks to put this information up. For Zindo to post that he wants the thugs to scare the daylights out of Mr. Feeley for posting this anti-war information is disrespecting what his step-son and other relations are fighting for. (Sorry harvib I know you tried to explain yourself but even after reading your second explanation I saw the potential for people to still not understand what you meant, just wanted to clarify)

I see this event as completely plausible when put in perspective with everything else those sneaky buggers in the CIA/FBI/Bush Co. get up to but this event could have been caused by anyone. A local pro-war group, a racist group (they hate Middle Easterners = they support them dying), some random Joe who saw the site and hates it, some kid playing a joke and threatening his life to sketch him out, OR it could be government agents. What I, and Novus, are looking for is concrete evidence that it was who Alex Jones claims it to be. If no one can prove this then this theory has no merit.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 17 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 13 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 19 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 18 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags