Mexican Military Infiltrate U.S. Border & Hold U.S. Border Agent At Gunpoint, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 21 times


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 01:05 AM by BlasteR
reply to post by GhostR1der



I agree. And the average politician actually doesn't make that much compared to some of the celebrities out there. But, yet, alot of these politicians are rich. Earmarks is one reason.

www.salon.com...

How are we to dissect a deluge like this one? We might begin by categorizing the earmarks handed out by Congress, sorting the foolish earmarks from the costly earmarks from the earmarks made strictly on a cash basis. We could try a similar approach to government contracting: the no-bid contracts, the no-oversight contracts, the no-experience contracts, the contracts handed out to friends of the vice president. We might consider the shoplifting career of one of the president's former domestic policy advisors or the habitual plagiarism of the president's liaison to the Christian right. And we would certainly have to find some way to parse the extraordinary incompetence of the executive branch, incompetence so fulsome and steady and reliable that at some point Americans stopped being surprised and began simply to count on it, to think of incompetence as the way government works.

But the onrushing flow swamps all taxonomies. Mass firing of federal prosecutors; bribing of newspaper columnists; pallets of shrink-wrapped cash "misplaced" in Iraq; inexperienced kids running the Baghdad stock exchange; the discovery that many of Alaska's leading politicians are apparently on the take -- our heads swim. We climb to the rooftop, but we cannot find the heights of irony from which we might laugh off the blend of thug and Pharisee that was Tom DeLay -- or dispel the nauseating suspicion, quickly becoming a certainty, that the government of our nation deliberately fibbed us into a pointless, catastrophic war.


-ChriS

[edit on 8-8-2008 by BlasteR]


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 10:37 AM by Alferd Packer
[edit on 8-8-2008 by Alferd Packer]



reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 10:51 AM by Alferd Packer
Im sorry i thought this would be relavent to the topic concerning Illegal Immigrants.

wcco.com...



This lady "tacoed" into the side of a bus killing 4 children and then claims her boyfriend who is also an illegal was driving the van when it barrolled into the side of the school bus at 40 MPH.

These Illegals dont bother to learn our laws and its a threat to our national security if they feel that they have the right to nomadically roam across borders to ANY COUNTRY, not just our beautiful United States of America.


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 04:06 PM by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by Ariana9
Look, I am not refering to anyone who is here legally. You are oversensitive. The river is wide and deep where I lived at and they swim over. My boyfriend was a Mexican national, he was legal so he was not a "wetback". When I moved down there, one of my hispanic friends told me "it's ok to say wetback, you don't have to whisper it". I thought it was derogatory till I learned that even American born hispanics used it, it refers to the illegals who swim over. So lighten up. Yes, if I called a legal-to-be-here hispanic, a wetback, then yes, that's insulting because they are not here illegally. I guess I could call them defendants. Or perpertrators. I tended bar at several of the river bars and actually waited on people that had just swam over and were wet from head to toe, even their money was wet. I'm sorry you were insulted, but I have not insulted you, nor would I.


"Wetback" is derogatory slang referring to someone who is here illegally. US citizens that are hispanic will use the term freely (or "mojado", which is spanish for "wet"). This does not mean that it should be used.

if you call the wrong person a "wetback" you are likely to be seriously injured. As well, "La Raza" type groups are not likely to respond to such terms favorably.

it would be better if you just said something like "I am sorry. I didn't mean to offend and used an adjective that was in appropriate unknowingly." Or something like that.

Something else you may not know: a lot of hispanics don't like the term "Mexican", either. It is recieved as a derogatory reference. "HIspanic" or "Latino" is preferred by most. A sure way to start a fight in Texas to to call them a "Mexican", but say it like "Messkin".

They are a proud people, on the whole. Like any people, treat them with the respect you want your children treated with.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags