Planet X Found in Worldwide Telescope?? , page 2

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 5 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 04:13 PM by skekke

reply to post by Tricky63

My pleasure dude... well they do say that Nibiru only can be seen with the pole telescope. and the IRAS telescope... Because nibiru doesn't emit light we can see with a "normal" telescope. but a whole lot of heat.. I have heard so much different things , but Zecharia Sitchin I think is the most credible one... well I think Ill do some more research now... hehe..

[edit on 6-8-2008 by skekke]

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 04:32 PM by ngchunter

Originally posted by skekke
reply to post by ngchunter

I'm just speculating dude. and maybe there is something to it or not.. but we wont find out jack if nobody talks about it..
stop attacking ppl just for saying there opinion..
and that's my opinion..
whats yours?

[edit on 6-8-2008 by skekke]

My opinion is that whatever it is, assuming it's even from a physical object, must be experiencing enough red shift to make it inivisble in the visible spectrum of light. That means it's certainly nowhere in our solar system, and is probably a very distant object. I have yet to see the images myself, but perhaps it's simply a natural variation in background radiation levels. That would explain the size described. Note that I'm not attacking you personally, I'm questioning your conclusions. I don't think there's anything wrong with the latter.

[edit on 6-8-2008 by ngchunter]

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 04:42 PM by ngchunter

Originally posted by skekke
well they do say that Nibiru only can be seen with the pole telescope.

If it were at the coordinates you listed on page 1, no telescope at the south pole could see it and any telescope in the northern hemisphere could see it.

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 05:01 PM by skekke

reply to post by ngchunter

I think it was the South Pole Telescope (SPT) that could "see" it..
But I haven't any verification on that...
so my mind is open

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 05:07 PM by keeff

reply to post by skekke

may i ask what you are using to see this object? is it a telescope? google earth? . sorry i'm a little lost and would really like to check this out.

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 05:17 PM by OzWeatherman

Originally posted by skekke
reply to post by Tricky63

My pleasure dude... well they do say that Nibiru only can be seen with the pole telescope. and the IRAS telescope... Because nibiru doesn't emit light we can see with a "normal" telescope. but a whole lot of heat.. I have heard so much different things , but Zecharia Sitchin I think is the most credible one... well I think Ill do some more research now... hehe..

[edit on 6-8-2008 by skekke]

If Nibiru is in fact what yopu PX'ers claim it to be, then the amount of heat emitted by it would be similar to the same amount of heat emitted by a large gas planet like Jupiter. And the only way you're gonna see that is if you have a tool to pick up radiation heat.

And can someone please post an image so we can properly debunk this thread?

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 05:35 PM by cpdaman

unfortunately/fortunately you can only debunk it in your mind .

btw i doubt this is planet x, but debunking is too much of an absolute , by those who i think are uncomfortable with uncertainty.

[edit on 6-8-2008 by cpdaman]

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 05:37 PM by altered_states

Originally posted by keeff
reply to post by skekke

may i ask what you are using to see this object? is it a telescope? google earth? . sorry i'm a little lost and would really like to check this out.

Try this keef and input the coordinates that the op posted
www.worldwidetelescope.org...

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 05:37 PM by ngchunter

Originally posted by skekke
reply to post by ngchunter

I think it was the South Pole Telescope (SPT) that could "see" it..
But I haven't any verification on that...
so my mind is open

I've heard that one before, which is why I specifically said that it's impossible for any telescope at the south pole, including the SPT, to see anything at the coordinates you provided on the first page. The coordinates you provided never rise above the horizon from the south pole.

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 05:43 PM by skekke

reply to post by ngchunter

Okey good ! thank you for clearing that up..

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 05:47 PM by Neomax

Well seen as alot of us are no good with co-ordinates or astrology and such like, i will have to quote a well famous internet phrase...

PICS OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN

But seriously, sounds very interesting so far, would just like to see some pics myself.

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 05:49 PM by Mercenary2007

using the cord. the OP gave us this is what comes up. he's talking about where the + is in the pic below

closer view

Honestly OP that looks like 2 very distant stars not a planet. and the planet x's have always claimed that planet x could only been seen from the south pole so like someone else said earlier this could easily seen from anywhere in the northern hemisphere so i guess that just debunked the whole can only been seen from the south pole or it just debunked your theory that this is planet x.

[edit on 6-8-2008 by Mercenary2007]

[edit on 6-8-2008 by Mercenary2007]

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 05:59 PM by ngchunter

I just downloaded this worldwidetelescope thing. It's not planet X, it's just a regular planet of our solar system. That's why it happens to lie perfectly on the ecliptic line. It's also why it only appears in the IRIS catalogue, but when you switch to SFD 100 micron it vanishes - it's a planet moving along the line of the ecliptic. If the WWT would tell you when the picture was taken I could tell you exactly what planet it is.

[edit on 6-8-2008 by ngchunter]

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 06:10 PM by skekke

reply to post by Mercenary2007

You know I'm not saying that it is planet x, .. just wondering why it is unidentified ? it looks pretty big to me.. When you see a star 1000 times smaler next to it, witch is identified.. that just makes me think... it was a bad view of it in the picture btw. better to dowload the worldwide telescope and see for your self!

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 06:15 PM by Peepers

Heres a little pointer to your next post. When you want some one to view a coord, please include a link to the location you input the coords you gave out so we can follow your path to the images. Otherwise a screen shot of the image posted in your post would help immensely.

As it now stands, I have no idea how you acquired the image you want us to discuss. I donot know the website you input the coords for the image and I am at a total loss to follow this thread.

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 06:17 PM by skekke

reply to post by ngchunter

wow! nice dude! It's always great to have the answer to the question one has pondered on all night long..

would have been cool to know witch planet yes! but i dont think I will take it that far my friend... if you find out doh, tell me about it!! good night from Norway!

just had to do a little more looking at IT and the other planets... and i am not sure it is one of the planets... so I am still not sure about this... case is open for my part..

[edit on 6-8-2008 by skekke]

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 06:18 PM by LunarLooney1

Thanks for keeping an eye out... it keeps us all on our toes and up to date with information.

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 06:23 PM by bmdefiant

At least one good thing came out of it for me...this Microsoft Worldwide Telescope thingy.Im downloading it now to give it a try out since ive not used one of these programs since...was it Red Shift ?

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 06:23 PM by skekke

reply to post by Peepers

how do I post pictures right up on the screen ?

reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 06:46 PM by Peepers

reply to post by skekke

You have to signup for a free image hosting account with photobucket.

Image posting rules and guidline

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 5 >> ^^TOP^^