|
reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 10:24 PM by TheHunted
|

reply to post by AntisepticSkeptic
Dude you are so WEAK and no true skeptic! Skepticism does require some sort of intellect, which you obviously lack. Each one of your posts takes
shot's at the OP or the subject being discussed just so you can claim to be the skeptic you ARE NOT!!!
I see you got rid of Bill Nye. Wait Bill is that you?
Getting back to the topic. I believe even if he were to reveal the names of his contacts folks would still feel as they do now. As Edgar has mentioned
most of them are deceased, no one to verify his claims.
Why can't Edgar Mitchell be interviewed as the Astronaut instead of the Alien guy?
[edit on 6-8-2008 by TheHunted]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 10:43 PM by Quazga
|
Originally posted by AntisepticSkeptic
Originally posted by hardcoremusiclover
From his mouth "We dont have proof"
Yup.
Well that pretty much sums it up now doesn't it.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 10:48 PM by Grayarea
|
That was cool, I listened to it all and for a 76 year old he still sounds sharp, not like some would say he's an old guy rambling on. He has walked
on the moon, so yes he has tons of credibility.
thx for the heads up
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 10:50 PM by adrenochrome
|
great interview! does anyone know where i can get a downloadable mp3 or something?
[edit on 6-8-2008 by adrenochrome]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 11:05 PM by FlySolo
|
Hey, I just missed the program but caught the last two calls and where he mentions they will re-broadcast @ 11pm pacific time. Will listen then. Just
one question. The player provided from the site was skipping every time the flash add banner refreshed. Is there a way around that?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 11:09 PM by FlySolo
|
Btw, I saw a ufo over Vancouver last night while stepping out for a smoke on my balcony. Just thought I would share.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 12:11 AM by AntisepticSkeptic
|

Gosh!
Who woudda thunk of that?  So the purpose of the interview was?
Ok. Since YOU'RE the UFO researvcher. Why don't YOU ask him the question?
And of yeah. Just a little tip for a UFO researcher of more than something-seomthing years. Don't forget to bring a tape recorder. (haw)
You know, to collect the thing that people call, uh ....evidence?
Again this interview has nothing new. Same old same old.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 12:51 AM by Frith
|
While its nice that a NASA astronaut is on the side of pro-UFO/ET conspiracy, I'm not sure what Dr. Mitchell is attempting to achieve by going out
and saying he's heard from other people about the reality of it and basing his public statements and beliefs on the subject upon that. As soon as
anybody asks him if he has anything to back up his claims or if he knows anything else, he can be immediately "debunked" because he brings nothing
else other than his credentials. If Mitchell wasn't a former NASA astronaut nobody would be paying attention to what he's said other people have
said to him.
Gordon Cooper was a little better in this regard. Stating that he saw at one point a film with a UFO on it that was apparently confiscated and I
believe making some allusions to actually seeing UFOs during some flights rather than being a third party witness like Mitchell.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 01:09 AM by SonicInfinity
|
Considering the praise in this topic, I think I'll watch it tomorrow when I have the time. It sounds interesting.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 01:31 AM by Ferengi
|
Can anyone get an mp3 up of this? Perhaps heighten the quality as well?
Thanks.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 01:43 AM by Fulcrum29
|
I didn't hear the interview. The biggest story of the whole show seems to me would be his comments on Clark Mclelland. Can someone please state as
accurately as possible word for word what Edgar Mitchell stated about Clark Mclelland? Because I trust Dr. Mitchell 100000% and anything he states
about Mclelland I would believe instantly so if he says that Clark is a phony then that is sealed for me.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 02:38 AM by Schaden
|
Originally posted by Fulcrum29
Can someone please state as accurately as possible word for word what Edgar Mitchell stated about Clark Mclelland?
Keven brought up how another NASA employee had come forward with information. Then he mentioned Clark and how he claims to have seen an alien inside
the shuttle's bay from a video camera inside a NASA facility. He asked Edgar Mitchell if he was familiar with the story etc... Mitchell said he's
seen Clark's website. Kevin asked him what he thought. Mitchell said he "didn't put much credence into McClellan's claim". Kevin asked him why
and Mitchell said he'd rather not go into it. And that was the end of it.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 02:54 AM by SL55T0T0
|
this is retarded... 4 pages and still no way to hear the interview...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 03:00 AM by Schaden
|

Originally posted by AntisepticSkeptic
So, he's the one who's making these outlandish claims in the first place, yet he's not the one to elucidate on it?
He made no outlandish claims. His comments about UFOs/aliens are conservative. Basically he heard all the rumors when the Roswell incident occurred.
(He lived in the area) After he became an astronaut, many of the old timers, (sheriff's posse, Roswell Air Field military/intelligence personnel, as
well as defense scientists directly involved with the cover up (i.e. they handled the crashed ship and/or bodies) confided to him that it was real.
He started reading up on the subject of UFOs etc.. But the incident that caused him to believe for certain those people were telling the truth
happened back in 1997. When the recent disclosure political movement was picking up steam, he visited the Pentagon to inquire with his contact, a Vice
Admiral in the Intelligence Dept of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
The vice admiral told him he didn't know anything about UFO/aliens but would find out. The Admiral contacted him again to follow up and said Roswell
and the gist of what you're talking about (alien visitation) is real. However the Admiral informed Mitchell he was unable to get additional details,
due to not having a need to know.
There are two options here. Either Mitchell is lying about this meeting, or it happened as he described. Draw your own conclusions.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 04:34 AM by vance
|
   
MsSmartypants asks in part:
"I'd like to ask you how you know all these ufology icons?"
uforeality responds in part:
"I don't want any fame or fortune, I like working behind the scenes."
uforeality states in part in another reply to his post:
"HAHA - Kevin mentioned my name Eric Taber and thanked me. Kudos to you Kevin, you're welcome bud!"
Lol uforeality, you are a tireless self promoter  Why don't you answer MsSmartypants question, seems it was reasonable enough. I see two
possibilities here:
1. You actualy know alot of the people you promote.
2. You are a big fan of this 'disclosure' and want to be seen as a bigger part of it than you actualy are.
Not knowing the answer myself, I will let you answer
[edit on 8-7-2008 by vance]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 04:41 AM by donhuangenaro
|
Originally posted by AntisepticSkeptic
I doubt he has any evidence to show us, AGAIN.
And like any UFO *ehem* enthusiast he will spout extraordinary claims with nothing to back up other than his words, AGAIN.
And the best this guy can do is ask ho-humm questions and forcing bad music into our ears.
Yip.
[edit on 6-8-2008 by AntisepticSkeptic]
ok, please, prove to me that LOVE exist (scientifically, in meters, grammes, pounds, etc)...
or is love a result of 'outlandish' claims by crazy people?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 06:38 AM by AntisepticSkeptic
|
Originally posted by SL55T0T0
this is retarded... 4 pages and still no way to hear the interview...
He usually puts up a podcast afer a few days or so of the entire interview, and that's including the bad music.
[edit on 7-8-2008 by AntisepticSkeptic]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 06:44 AM by AntisepticSkeptic
|

Originally posted by donhuangenaro
ok, please, prove to me that LOVE exist (scientifically, in meters, grammes, pounds, etc)...
or is love a result of 'outlandish' claims by crazy people?
Love and aliens/alien spacecraft are two different things. One is emotion and the other one is physical - at least the 'eyewitnesses' claim that
they are, physical.
So, no. 'LOVE' cannot be measured in the physical sense (meters, pounds etc) though you can measure the associated BrainWave patterns related to the
emotion of 'love'.
[edit on 7-8-2008 by AntisepticSkeptic]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 07:15 AM by dariousg
|
reply to post by Schaden
Exactly. I hear some of the skepticism and can understand why it appears on this site about Mitchell. However, we DO have to take his credentials
into consideration. He is not a kook or a nut job. He is a brilliant man who was sane enough to last in the space program and actually be one of a
few (that we know of) that actually stepped foot on the moon.
I guess one way to verify this may be to figure out who the Vice Admiral was in 1997 at the pentagon. I know we wouldn't be able to approach him but
at least we would have a starting point for verification.
The point is, the skeptics of Mitchell have a valid argument. No proof. Just 'he said' and so on. BUT, with all of the other big names that have
come forward we have to put a little more credence on his story.
Don't believe if you don't want to but you have to admit that he does have high credentials.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |