reply to post by SpeakerofTruth
I agree with part of what you're saying, but I think I probably am reading it differently than you intended. I think a large problem with George
Bush is that he wants people to be happy and wants to be well liked. As a result he's seriously hurt his base via pandering to the left... which has
been proven to be a vast waste of his time anyway, as the left would hate him even if God shined down a beam of light onto Crawford and declared
"Behold, here is my son with whom I am pleased." (and that has nothing to do with the idea liberals are Godless heathens, either.)
He's pandered on immigration, he's pandered in the war by ordering our millitary to tread lightly and actually giving a misplaced damn about
international opinion and collateral damage, and he's certainly pandered the hell out of the liberals on environmental issues. Hell, he's
acknowledged more global warming psuedo-science mumbo jumbo than Clinton ever did, and Bill Clinton is erroneously remembered by both sides as being
an environmental president. It's much like Richard Nixon, actually. Nixon was by far and away the most socially liberal republican president of the
last 40 years. What happened with that one? Well... prior to GWB most older libs would have named Nixon #1 on their most hated presidents list.