Thanks for taking the time to respond. I just see it as counter-productive, and potentially dangerous, to toss out a psychological diagnosis based on
anecdotal evidence, no matter how compelling I might agree that evidence is. Like the entire GFL/Blossom Goodchild issue, I don't see how it serves
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.