posted on Aug, 7 2008 @ 09:10 AM
reply to post by weedwhacker
See, this is what I was referring from you guys. All this nonsense ad hoc debunking. You're purposefully ignoring the fact that there were TWO jets,
and making up a silly psuedo explanation in the hopes you can get the last word in and descredit the testimony.
The chances of two jets dumping fuel at the same time in the same place as close to nil, with all your claimed years of pilot experience you should
know this. And what about the grid pattern? And what about the expanding trails which resulted in cloud cover? And what about the ash like substance
coming down with the light rain? And what about ATC being very tight lipped and not identifying the aircraft? And what about the fact they came here,
flew about yet didn't land, when this is the end of the line for european regional flights?
You have a complex testimony which you can't easily explain, so you chip away at it with nonsense, like a woodpecker at a tree. Please, do not waste
my time. This can't be debunked, it was atmospheric spraying and, at the very least, weather manipulation.
I, as a tax paying citized of a democratic country, do not like my weather manipulated without being informed and without popular consent. And if it
was more than that... well, sooner or later heads will roll.