An Attempt to Debunk Chemtrails For Good, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 26 times


reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 09:44 PM by Matrix1111
Originally posted by Clearskies

The fact that airlines like
Evergreen aviations sell planes for 'weather modification' should wake people up to the fact that spraying anything on an unknowing population is going on!


Very good point. So this means the equipment exists.

It's been PROVEN that spraying ecoli and other stuff has been done in America and Britain! Chemical testing
Check the links, please.
It's infuriating that it's being done and no one has PROVEN it, yet...


Another good link. Not proof, but definitely circumstantial evidence should make the strongest skeptic think twice.


reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 10:12 PM by Clearskies
Here's another thread that is worth looking at.
It's getting MORE rational public attention.



reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 10:44 PM by Matrix1111
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
reply to
post by Matrix1111


Marrs wrote that?

I wonder how he thinks aluminum and barium would counteract brucellosis?


I don't know. That's way over my head, even if I just stayed overnight at a Holiday Inn Express.

But here's some expert making connections to barium:

www.bariumblues.com...

Oh, I forgot this:

www.youtube.com...

[edit on 8/6/2008 by Matrix1111]


reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 11:01 PM by ghofer
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
reply to
post by ghofer
AN AIRLINE MANAGER'S STATEMENT

Project Cloverleaf


Posted by C.E. Carnicom on behalf of the author May 22 2000

www.carnicom.com...

Mr. Carnicom:

About twenty employees in our office were briefed along with me by two officials from some government agency. They didn't tell us which one. They told us that the government was going to pay our airline, along with others, to release special chemicals from commercial aircraft.
Thank you.



I can't understand how an airliner would release the chemicals in flight. If there were some external spaying equipment, it would surely be obvious. If they mix it into the jet fuel, then why bother telling the airline staff about it? And if, as some claim, biological agents are being put into jet fuel, I can't see how they'd survive in that stuff or being burned in the engine. Sounds pretty suspect to me.

With that said, it seems that the U.S. does like to experiment with bio-weapons on it's citizens. I have another thread here that I started with info from the Baltimore Chronicle:
Bio-weapons tests on U.S. civilians


[edit on 6-8-2008 by ghofer]



reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 12:03 AM by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by ghofer
I can't understand how an airliner would release the chemicals in flight. If there were some external spaying equipment, it would surely be obvious. If they mix it into the jet fuel, then why bother telling the airline staff about it? And if, as some claim, biological agents are being put into jet fuel, I can't see how they'd survive in that stuff or being burned in the engine. Sounds pretty suspect to me.

Despite what some disinfo agents have said, nothing's ever been mixed into the fuel. Have you read
this mechanic's claims?

...One day last month I was called out from our base to work on a plane for another airline. When I got the call the dispatcher did not know what the problem was. When I got to the plane I found out that the problem was in waste disposal system. There was nothing for me to do but to crawl in and fix the problem. When I got into the bay I realized that something was not right. There were more tanks, pumps, and pipes then should have been there. At first I assumed that the system had been changed. It had been 10 years since I had worked on one. As I tried to find the problem I quickly realized the extra piping and tanks were not connected to the waste disposal system. I had just discovered this when another mechanic from my company showed up. It was one of the mechanics who usually works on these systems. I happily turned the job over to him. As I was leaving I asked him about the extra equipment. He told me to "worry about my end of the plane and let him worry about his!"

The next day I was on the company computer to look up a wiring schematic. While I was there I decided to look up the extra equipment I had found. To my amazement the manuals did not show any of the extra equipment I had seen with my own eyes the day before. I even tied in to the manufacturer files and still found nothing. Now I was really determined to find out what that equipment did.

The next week we had three of our planes in our main hanger for periodic inspection. There are mechanics crawling all over a plane during these inspections. I had just finished my shift and I decided to have a look at the waste system on one of our planes. With all the mechanics around I figured that no one would notice an extra one on the plane. Sure enough, the plane I choose had the extra equipment!

I began to trace the system of pipes, pumps, and tanks. I found what appeared to be the control unit for the system. It was a standard looking avionics control box but it had no markings of any kind. I could trace the control wires from the box to the pumps and valves but there were no control circuits coming into the unit. The only wires coming into the unit was a power connection to the aircraft's main power bus.

The system had 1 large and 2 smaller tanks. It was hard to tell in the cramped compartment but it looked like the large tank could hold 50 gallons. The tanks were connected to a fill and drain valve that passed through the fuselage just behind the drain valve for the waste system. When I had a chance to look for this connection under the plane I found it cunningly hidden behind a panel under the panel used to access the waste drain.

I began to trace the piping from the pumps. These pipes lead to a network of small pipes that ended in the trailing edges of the wings and horizontal stabilizers. If you look closely at the wings of a large airplane you will see a set of wires, about the size of your finger, extending from the trailing edge of the wing surfaces. These are the static discharge wicks. They are used to dissipate the static electric charge that builds up on a plane in flight. I discovered that the pipes from this mystery system lead to every 1 out of 3 of these static discharge wicks. These wicks had been "hollowed out" to allow whatever flows through these pipes to be discharged through these fake wicks.

It was while I was on the wing that one of the managers spotted me. He ordered me out of the hanger telling me that my shift was over and I had not been authorized any overtime...

Originally posted by ghofer
With that said, it seems that the U.S. does like to experiment with bio-weapons on it's citizens. I have another thread here that I started with info from the Baltimore Chronicle:
Bio-weapons tests on U.S. civilians

You got that right. The U.S. has a long and sordid history of biological experimentation on it's citizens: www.apfn.org...

Here's a good one:

1945: "Program F" is implemented by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). This is the most extensive U.S. study of the health effects of fluoride, which was the key chemical component in atomic bomb production. One of the most toxic chemicals known to man, fluoride, it is found, causes marked adverse effects to the central nervous system but much of the information is squelched in the name of national security because of fear that lawsuits would undermine full-scale production of atomic bombs.


[edit on 7-8-2008 by GoldenFleece]


reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 12:23 AM by mantic
Originally posted by mantic
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
reply to
post by Clearskies



Yes it is normal. All that is happening is that the air traffic in the USA is extremely heavy, so naturally you will have planes that criss cross each others paths and planes that sit in holding patterns at high altitude, waiting for their time to descend. I posted a link in the original post that shows the density of air travel in one hour, its a phenomenal amount


Could it be reasonable to assume that some of this traffic density is being created by these chem planes?


Yes it is very reasonable. However, if indeed the sky "loosing it's blueness" due to increased traffic, taking "chemtrails" out of the equation. Then would it be safe to assume that we are in deeper doo doo? What is the outcome, what is being done to reverse such trend?

Here are some interesting pictures of the phenomena from the site weatherwars. The proprietor has some interesting theory.





The arrowed location is at the intersection of three contrail lines. It just happens to be the point at which one of the contrails rolls over in an area of strong lateral shear artificially introduced into the sky. We would have never known about it without the chemtrails. With a grid like this you can tell they are hunting scalar activity.




A nice true color image from NASA looking at the back edge of a storm that is just clearing the western Great Lakes states. This is a very dry atmospheric environment in that the passing storm has cleared the area of available moisture for clouds formation plus the inherent stabilization, post storm, leads to very clear skies. So we have many thick contrails that are lasting in an environment that shouldn’t support their visible existence. Hence we have evidence of the contrail markers versus natural contrails. Abundant rippling over Michigan tells us that we have EM energies stimulating the atmosphere and thus the weather makers need to fly the contrails to measure this action and decide whether to employ counter measures as needed. A couple of arrows have been added to point out the thick spreading contrails laid down just along the back edge of this storm, and the interesting dissipation over central Lake Superior marked earlier by the fading three north/south contrails.










In need of more data… a second plane is flown in the vicinity to see if the scalar/gravatonic energy remains present to deform the second contrail.



I just know that something is going on, and I do not believe it is due to increased passenger and freight air traffic

[edit on 7-8-2008 by mantic]

[edit on 7-8-2008 by mantic]


reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 01:25 AM by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by mantic

A nice true color image from NASA looking at the back edge of a storm that is just clearing the western Great Lakes states. This is a very dry atmospheric environment in that the passing storm has cleared the area of available moisture for clouds formation plus the inherent stabilization, post storm, leads to very clear skies. So we have many thick contrails that are lasting in an environment that shouldn’t support their visible existence. Hence we have evidence of the contrail markers versus natural contrails. Abundant rippling over Michigan tells us that we have EM energies stimulating the atmosphere and thus the weather makers need to fly the contrails to measure this action and decide whether to employ counter measures as needed. A couple of arrows have been added to point out the thick spreading contrails laid down just along the back edge of this storm, and the interesting dissipation over central Lake Superior marked earlier by the fading three north/south contrails.



Where's the back edge of the storm? Whoever wrote that has no idea how to interpret satellite imagery, lol

I am actually stationed at one of the most storm prone areas of tropical Australia and being with the bureau of meteorology I obviously get first hand satellite imagery as it comes through. I have never seen storm clouds look like that before


reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 02:28 AM by Essan
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
The fact is, evidence that proves the existence of chemtrails is now overwhelming.

What evidence? I still see nothing to disprove the meteorological science and chemistry of it all.

Feel free to point out any error in this contrail physics model: (if you can)

www.carnicom.com...


I never realised Cliff Carnicon was an atmospheric scientist. How come he's had no papers on the subject published? I wonder if he's read these?

A New Formulation for the Critical Temperature for Contrail Formation

An Empirical Model to Predict Widespread Occurrence of Contrails

Numerical Simulations of Persistent Contrails

Calculations of Aircraft Contrail Formation Critical Temperatures

The Application of the Revised Algorithm for the Predition of the Formation of Exhaust Condensation Trails by Jet Aircraft

And I could go on

As for Carnicon's own reworking of atmospheric physics, i note he claims his model, predicting contrails to dissipate within 30 seconds due to the heat of solar radiation "... agree extremely well with the observed properties of contrails over their historical existence" - which very clearly is not the case since contrails have never been observed to behave in accordance with his model and have been observed to persist and spread into sheets of cirrus since the dawn of air travel.

He also comments: "If the dissipation of an observed contrail does not conform to the model above, and the corresponding physics and chemistry and math of same, then the logical conclusion that can be drawn is that the
material of emission is not likely to be water vapor. As mentioned earlier, the physics of cloud formation are an entirely separate process, and are
highly dependent upon temperature, relative humidity, aerosol type and the size of aerosol particles that are introduced
." obviously omitting the possibility that his model might be wrong and of course, as one would expect, ignoring all scientific research into the subject which does not agree with his assertions.

It's possible his model is right, but even basic observation suggests otherwise. Normal contrails do not always dissipate rapidly. And claiming that is they don;t they cannot be normal contrails is circular reasoning and, besides, ignores historical observation - unless one assumes chemtrails have been around since the 1930s?



reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 03:12 AM by TruthTellist
reply to post by OzWeatherman (<--DisinformationRule8: Invoke authority)



Not everyone Just you and two others...

FOIA Reading Room

Every Declassified Document Can found Here

I recommend using these websites to find out about declassified programmes and projects.

Key words to use : Aerosol, Lidar, Particulate, Dispersion, Biological, Chemical, Populations, Race-Specific, parasitic, weaponised, Nematode, Infectious, nano-tube, nano-technology, nano-scale weapons, Dominance

I'm sure the inquistive mind could think of a lot of ways to use these resources

The government also likes to substitute 'defense system' in place of 'weapon' - an recurring tactic used throughout many declassified documents

Also; Check these links out - some people might see some connections.

Walter Reed Army Medical - Dermatology Dept.

Tropical Parasites (Creeping Nematodes anyone?)


[edit on 7-8-2008 by TruthTellist]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Chem Trail Link - They Are Killing Your Brain.
  Posted 11 days ago with 33 member flags
Chemtrails spraying is making us sick
  Posted 12 days ago with 28 member flags
Why do they block the sun?
  Posted 19 days ago with 19 member flags
Aluminum + Fluoride = Alzheimer’s and Dementia
  Posted 18 days ago with 17 member flags
Heavy "Spraying"* in Phoenix Today 2-1-12
  Posted 9 days ago with 12 member flags