This is the link to my quoted post on page 92:
and the rest below the part that you quoted above explains why all that actually didn't happen:
To obtain some expertise, I went to the PilotsFor911Truth site, and found this informative post in their latest thread:
This NORAD/FAA data streams-based flight path has been prepared from May 2002 to June 2002 by AGI, and is already earlier shortly addressed in a
PowerPoint presentation of that AGI firm, who made the flightpath video:
As being at that time, 2002, for internal use.
See their PP-presentation here:
The PowerPoint presentation seems to have been presented to NORAD officials at 11:30 on 06-03-2002.
As an internal memo at that time.
Why did they, the Headquarters of NORAD, knew already at such an early time (March 2002 is the earliest date on the AGI.com papers, six months after
9/11), that flight 77 flew at the North side of the CITGO station, at nearly exactly the same flightpath as described by the 13 witnesses interviewed
by the CIT team, and kept quiet about it ALL THESE YEARS ?
Knowing that the basis of the interpretation of the official flightpath, South of CITGO, being the downed 5 light poles and the internal Pentagon
damage, which must thus be very questionable also.
And why did NORAD HQ let us getting obsessed in those following six and a half years by all these anomalies in the officially released events
timelines and explanations, which turned out now, to be fraudulent from the beginning.
Why did someone decide to give this information free in a FOIA request, at this point in time? Normally the issuing institutions would black this sort
of information out, so why not now?
Are some real patriotic Americans being pushed too far and too often over a certain threshold, which they couldn't accept anymore?
That flight 77 flight path animation was released just recently, but it was made and used already within months after 9/11. It existed for many years
already, still unreleased to the public.
However, only when the reader believes that all the officially released FOIA data lately, and archived at John Farmers website, is in fact cleverly
altered, this animation fits.
At least altered for the final lap of flight 77, or whatever other plane is shown in all that data.
And probably altered also for the flightpath of the C-130.
Strong evidence for both of those allegations are most of the CIT witnesses.
If you can believe that the few ones who control a government or a small part of it or it's military propaganda arm could plan and exercise something
like this (which they did numerous times already in the past, and again after 9/11 btw), then it doesn't sound so alienated anymore to you, the
Scenario 1. CIT and flyover.
The plane must have flown slower and higher at the final few hundreds of meters of its flight path to be able to exercise that kind of slow right bank
north of CITGO witnessed by many interviewed by CIT, and passed in the same slow right bank low over the exploding charges and the Pentagon roof, and
landed at Reagan Airport.
Or flew away northwards following the River Approach corridor to attract less attention.
Scenario 2. CIT and no flyover.
It was blown up exactly after the moment it was remotely pushed down and aimed to hit the west wall of the Pentagon. And at that exact moment a, not
visible to the human eye, supersonic flying bunkerbuster hit the west wall, coming from the officially declared angle.
Launched from an unidentified, submerged submarine in, or a plane above, the Atlantic.
Indication of a last moment full blow up could be the strange pattern of roof fires, raging for a day and a night.
And those clipped poles were planted in advance. And the footage showing the planting, and the moments of impact, from those roof security cameras was
Just a simple swapping of tapes or hard disks by one person at the right moment.
Time enough to plan for a solid scenario after the first WTC basement bombing.
Why not let it hit directly without added security of that supersonic bunkerbuster?
To be 100% sure that there were no survivors on board, and that the bunkerbuster would precisely hit the target inside.
That one is far better to program with a very small error range, than a huge massive 757 witch will have much more inertia at play.
The heaviest plane parts, like the two jet engines parts of the plane aimed at the wall in the last seconds would still impact the wall, but the rest
of the plane would be blown to smithereens and bounce off the wall onto the grass and the helicopter port's landing pad.
The introduction of a third plane was to enrage the populace a notch further, and enforce the need for retaliation at all Muslim countries
And to hide the impact of a bunkerbuster.