It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by billybob
the majority of 'famous' witnesses either worked for 'USA today' or the military.
dubious at best.
i'm not 'assuming' the poles were violently knocked down. it is simple physics.
plant a pole in the ground, and hit it hard and fast enough sideways with a big hammer that it is either sheared at the base, or uprooted.
you cannot possibly hit a pole with a 120 ton hammer traveling at several hundred miles an hour, and have the poles fall over gently.
Originally posted by SPreston
If your 100 ton HAMMER struck the light poles at 535 mph, broke several heavy 247 lb poles in two. then how could they stand there and fall over later? Do you realize how ridiculous that concept is?
Your brand of pseudoskeptic physics sucks.
If the poles were just knocked over by the wind of the alleged 757 flying over them, then how were some torn in two without tearing up the ground, and why weren't the cars allegedly below the 757 also rolled over? If the aircraft wake turbulence could tear down the light poles, then why didn't it tear down the trees or branches?
Do you see why your pseudoskeptic physics is so stupid and illogical?
Originally posted by Soloist
Man, it must be tough for you here. I mean coming from LCF (you know that place where everyone agrees with each other, and if you don't you're banned, all in the quest for the "truth" of course) to answer the call for help from Aldo. To have people from the other side actually able to disagree with you must be rather frustrating.
Posting another impossible path! Gee, it takes over 3.6 Gs and 74 degrees of bank, a bank angle not seen by anyone on 9/11, not your witnesses, or anyone! Fake path again!?
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by discombobulator
...
Here is a VERY crude flight path estimate taking all of them into account starting with Steve Chaconas and his east of the river claim:
...
Get it now?
Sean Boger, Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief - "… I just watched it hit the building." "It exploded. I fell to the ground and covered my head. I could actually hear the metal going through the building."
Originally posted by discombobulator
An internal FOIA request? No request number?
I'm pretty sure I could go back and dig out a post where you claim to have gone through the FOIA process a few times before.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by discombobulator
An internal FOIA request? No request number?
I'm pretty sure I could go back and dig out a post where you claim to have gone through the FOIA process a few times before.
Well since i work at NSA the request was made internally, was it really that hard to figure out?
Please be mature enonugh to find out about things before posting. I have done many FOIA requests and have never had a request number.
I can scan a letter from the FOIA request i have done.
Posting another impossible path! Gee, it takes over 3.6 Gs and 74 degrees of bank, a bank angle not seen by anyone on 9/11, not your witnesses, or anyone! Fake path again!?
Originally posted by beachnut
Get it now?
Sean Boger, Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief - "… I just watched it hit the building." "It exploded. I fell to the ground and covered my head. I could actually hear the metal going through the building."
Get it Now? "hit the building"! One of your witnesses!
Originally posted by discombobulator
Uhuh.
Sure, show us this FOIA request letter.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Now there is a FOIA number on the letter that i have recieved from outside source (NTSB).
NTSB letter dated June 07, 2007
FOIA number 20070291.
Originally posted by fleabit
They use physical proof as a means to try to prove a point, yet they are dealing with things of a magnitude that has never been seen before. When is the last time we've seen a building of that magnitude collapse (WTC buildings)?
You work for the NSA in their core services, and support the ideas of the opening post?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by discombobulator
An internal FOIA request? No request number?
I'm pretty sure I could go back and dig out a post where you claim to have gone through the FOIA process a few times before.
Well since i work at NSA the request was made internally, was it really that hard to figure out?
Please be mature enonugh to find out about things before posting. I have done many FOIA requests and have never had a request number.
I can scan a letter from the FOIA request i have done.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
So how did 3 steel buildings collapse from fire in 1 day?
Originally posted by jthomas
Damage doesn't count?
The inability to fight the fires doesn't count?
The effects of heat don't count?
Originally posted by beachnut
The NSA knows you support lies and false information about 9/11, and post during duty hours?