Originally posted by jthomas
Now, are you going to provide the evidence we ask for or keep hiding?

Since the government isn't tasked with supplying their evidence, why should anyone have to supply it's suporters with anything?

You present your factual evidence first. After all, you're the one who believes the whole government and MSM laid out story. So, this evidence shouldn't be hard to find, right? But, we've gone through this before and you'll deny that the government has to supply anything but then cry that the "twoofers" have to supply evidence.

As Spock would say: "That is illogical, Captain."

Originally posted by jthomas

Originally posted by GoldenFleece
I find it highly unlikely, if not impossible that a 757's wings would fold up and sail through an impact hole that's just too small to make this scenario plausible.

It's always instructive that we have to remind you that the wings were destroyed and the impact hole was quite wide enough.

Everything was completely destroyed? Nothing but confetti? Then you forgot one more quote:

Originally posted by GoldenFleece
The symmetrical 12-foot hole in the outer 'C' ring is also highly unlikely, as no part of a 757 is capable of punching through six limestone, brick, concrete and steel-reinforced walls, especially when it's claimed that most of the plane disintegrated.

Wow Griff
Sorry bud but the CIT Pentagon Team is making EXTRAORDINARY CLAIMS.
They have yet to prove ANYTHING!
Hey Griff how is it going with getting that CIT rock solid, smoking gun evidence of MASS MURDER to a court?

Looks like the debunkodroids are arriving in force. Perhaps one more quote is in order:

Originally posted by GoldenFleece
CIT may well be on to something significant, which is why every debunker in the book is being thrown at them. I've always thought the more debunking something receives, the greater likelihood it's true.

Originally posted by TheBobert
Hey Griff how is it going with getting that CIT rock solid, smoking gun evidence of MASS MURDER to a court?

I don't know. Ask Craig.

Let me ask. Who specifically does CIT name in this mass murder plot? Or do you mean that it should be "CIT vs. the government"? If I've missed where they name a culprit, I apologize.

Originally posted by TheBobert
Hey Griff how is it going with getting that CIT rock solid, smoking gun evidence of MASS MURDER to a court?

How is it with you trying to find any piece of evidence that would support the official story in court?

I would love to know what you believers would do if me or someone did go to court and win outr case (specially with government documents that would hold up in court) what would you believers have to turn to to believe in next? I mean since you would have to stop living in the fantasy world you are in now.


[edit on 16-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]

Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
You just can't make this kind of comedy gold up.

Whats even better comedy is how beleivers can still believe in the official story with no evidence to support it and evidence coming out that questions it.

I've read the kudos and the info, I've seen other data that claims certain things happened, and certain things didn't... and as someone who has worked for 4 airlines, a charter company, and has been a pilot and partner of a small plane off and on for 19 years... I say this:
I've met and talked to many pilots who've told me some "amazing" things over a beer in MIA or MLB or APF or EYW or MHT or BDL... guys that drove things up to L-1011's or DC-10's... two were riding around in 737's... what matters is that these folks and I are not people who don't know the difference between a flying scion "t" or "x"... (i.e. 1977 Monte Carlo and Buick Regal) I'm good for identifying just about anything in the air, until I look at the homebuilts or ultralights that do things my Arrow would never be able to match with its' 1970's tech. I'll say this... do some homework and look at the Airliners Magazine regarding KAL 007(Korean AirLines) and the "ferretting" that occured with the Ruskies... just because some guy was flying A-10s doesn't mean he knew the F-117 existed at the time.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Whats even better comedy is how beleivers can still believe in the official story with no evidence to support it

Really? So all those pictures, eyewitness testimonies, expert testimonies, videos, physical evidence, common sense etc don't really exist? Thats quite a bold statement.

[edit on 16-8-2008 by Cool Hand Luke]

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

I would love to know what you believers would do if me or someone did go to court and win outr case (specially with government documents that would hold up in court) what would you believers have to turn to to believe in next? I mean since you would have to stop living in the fantasy world you are in now.

Then for the love of God please DO IT and let's FIND OUT.

Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
Oh, I forgot, their “in on it” too.

You know its really very sad and immature how you believers have such a 1 track mind. You keep demanding evidnece from others but can never provide any.

I still want to know what you will beleive in when the official 9/11 media story is proven wrong?

I am still waiting for any beleivers to post any actual evidnece that supports the official story, i guess i will have to go back to offering a reward. I have already posted a $1,000 reward years ago and someone else once offered a $2,000 reward and no one even tried.

Originally posted by discombobulator
Then for the love of God please DO IT and let's FIND OUT.

Stop with the nonsense. We all know what would happen -- the same thing that happened when Bob Dole's former chief of staff tried:

Stanley Hilton's 9/11 Suit Dismissed

The $7 billion federal class action lawsuit against top Bush Administration officials for, among other things, their roles in engineering and orchestrating the 911 attacks has been dismissed by Judge Illston. Attorney for the plaintiffs, Stanley Hilton is preparing an appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and hopes to reverse the judge's ruling.

Mr. Hilton will be making the fifteen page ruling dismissing the suit available to the public.

The judge's ruling was based on the "Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity". In other words, the suit was not dismissed because of lack of evidence, but rather because the judge reasoned that U.S. Citizens do not have the right to hold a sitting President accountable for anything, even if the charges include premeditated mass murder and premeditated acts of high treason.

What a surprise. Sovereign King George is immune. Probably should've figured that out right around the time Dubya started referring to the Constitution as a "goddam piece of paper."

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

I would love to know what you believers would do if me or someone did go to court and win outr case (specially with government documents that would hold up in court) what would you believers have to turn to to believe in next? I mean since you would have to stop living in the fantasy world you are in now.

I'll bite.

What is this Government document you keep referring to that would supposedly support your case?

Can you enlighten me, and perhaps produce it please?