The North Side Flyover - Officially Documented, Independently Confirmed, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 203 times


reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 01:46 PM by Aislin
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT



I would like to know more about the blue tent. What are they doing with it? What was it meant to cover, etc...

All of your evidence confirms deception, but why would this be necessary? What is the truth that needed to be hidden? If it wasn't the AA flight or plane, what happened to it?

I have read much about the Twin Towers and have seen enough evidence to believe that the planes did not cause the buildings to collapse. If our government (or some group in it) caused this tragedy, what did they achieve and why? The thought that Americans could do this to their own people is heartbreaking.


reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 01:53 PM by VitriolAndAngst
OK, this really resolves the two contradictory ideas on the blogs about what happened for me.

When I saw those frames the Pentagon released, and this vapor trail in the animated explosion. I cannot see any possible way that is a 747 or larger craft. Yet from eyewitnesses, it is clear that a large craft at least flew towards the building.

Eyewitness testimony is squirrelly at best -- but kudos for placing the people at a location where they were witnesses. You CAN KNOW what a person is capable of seeing from a particular vantage point, and rule out what they cannot know. That came in handy for debunking a lot of the government theory witnesses.

The idea of a fly-over, and a second device makes a lot of sense and dovetails nicely with the photographic evidence -- which NEVER proves a large plane in my mind, and the witnesses, who only see a large plane. No wonder they had to confiscate all the video and destroy radar tapes after the event -- these would probably have shown the plane to pass over the pentagon at a low altitude, and fly away. When nobody is expecting this 5 second event out of their day, and it ends with an explosion and a quick response to push the "official story" quickly afterward can fix the memory pretty easily that people saw a plane go into a building.

Thanks for this. I've shied away from the Pentagon stuff because until now, there was too little proof of anything.

Looking at all those people, lifting that blue-tarp/tent with one hand. I can't imagine there is even an engine in there. Yeah, it does look like it's empty underneath, but someone could claim that there was a structure over the engine. But why? Why was there a tarp at all and how did a large aircraft get moved so that nobody could see actual parts? Why even bother covering it up?

The only reason to cover things up is to hide guilt at a crime scene.



reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 02:13 PM by Craig Ranke CIT
Originally posted by Aislin
reply to
post by Craig Ranke CIT



I would like to know more about the blue tent. What are they doing with it? What was it meant to cover, etc...



The blue tent was one of many that was used during the recovery/rebuilding efforts that went on for months.




There is nothing suspicious about them at all.

They are evidence of nothing.


reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 02:21 PM by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by emsed1



The evidence proves it was planted to deceive people into believing that an AA jet hit the building.

Never forget....we went to talk to the witnesses to find out what happened BECAUSE of the suspicious lack of debris and anomalous physical damage.

The witnesses prove why all of that is so fishy.


reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 02:37 PM by emsed1
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to
post by emsed1



The evidence proves it was planted to deceive people into believing that an AA jet hit the building.

Never forget....we went to talk to the witnesses to find out what happened BECAUSE of the suspicious lack of debris and anomalous physical damage.

The witnesses prove why all of that is so fishy.


But respectfully it seems that is a real piece of a real AA jet on the ground.

Where did it come from? Who planted it?

And why?

Thanks!


reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 02:44 PM by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by emsed1



Think of it like this emsed1.....

Once there is evidence proving the official story false it implicates an extremely complex psychological black operation on a global scale.

It is impossible for any citizen investigator to answer all of the questions as to exactly how or who nor do we need to.

It is not our responsibility to answer these questions.

This is why we must demand congressional inquiries on a much deeper level.

We found the smoking gun proving their story false, we scientifically validated it more than 13 times over, so now we must demand investigations/inquiries/grand juries to get all of the questions that you and everyone else has answered.



reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 02:50 PM by spookjr
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT

Well done Craig. It seems obvious to any critical thinker that has not been brainwashed by the media that the 9-11 jet did not hit the Pentagon and did not hit the ground at Shanksville. I am compelled to summarize a bit here.
1. No bodies,not one. No evidence of a jet at all in either case. We are to believe that 2 turbo-fan engines constructed of aviation grade STEEL and TITANIUM and weighed 6 tons apeice simply vaporized,but DNA evidence did not? The coroner in Shanksville stated that he saw no bodies and 'not one drop of blood'. But DNA helped to identify the victims?
2. Comparison of similar crash sites revealed that the outcome of both the Pentagon crash and Shanksville are simply not feasible as many,many aspects of these incidents defy the laws of physics.
3. If the people on board these aircraft were still alive later then it is obvious that they were executed afterwards in order to silence them. This is almost more frightening than the crashes themselves. Imagine if you will, these people being executed one-by-one after surviving the most terrible ordeal of their lives.
It is time that the people responsible were held accountable. PERIOD.

[edit on 6-8-2008 by spookjr]


reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 02:52 PM by emsed1
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to
post by emsed1



Think of it like this emsed1.....

Once there is evidence proving the official story false it implicates an extremely complex psychological black operation on a global scale.

It is impossible for any citizen investigator to answer all of the questions as to exactly how or who nor do we need to.

It is not our responsibility to answer these questions.

This is why we must demand congressional inquiries on a much deeper level.

We found the smoking gun proving their story false, we scientifically validated it more than 13 times over, so now we must demand investigations/inquiries/grand juries to get all of the questions that you and everyone else has answered.





I understand your opinion, but you titled the thread "Officially Documented, Independently Confirmed" but it all seems like a collection of street interviews and conjectural drawings.

What is the smoking gun?

Where did the airplane go?

Who put that piece of airplane in the picture?

Why is it being faked?

I understand you have put an incredible amount of work into this, but surely you can't think that you can state something as fact (on ATS especially) and offer personal anecdotes and handmade drawings as proof.

Again, I am not slamming you but do you have an opinion as to these questions?


reply posted on 6-8-2008 @ 02:55 PM by truthquest
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT



Craig, your investigation is obviously top-notch. I think the next step is to find witnesses on the other side of the Pentagon to figure out the flight path after the plane flew over the building.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags