Moon Landing Photo

Listen to that which no one can explain and surmise the truth without ignorance... And with much patience.

grow earnest in your desire for truth but beware the gains of knowledge.


[edit on 8/8/08 by rezial666]

[edit on 8/8/08 by rezial666]

reply to post by Crystalbaraland

---

it is extremely entertaining that you post that which I linked to NASA's site as not relevant but that's ok since u did not ck out the site. I forgive... it's cool... We live and learn.


[edit on 8/8/08 by rezial666]

reply to post by Crystalbaraland

---

I only posted what was on NASA's Website. I declare only phyiscal evidence; only that which NASA has given... to the American People.. I do not entertain any endeavour to subjugate nor negate the natural events that moves a generation beyond simple diplomacy. Truth is not spoken nor heard... Rather truth is known and endured. By That will, we are each responsible and measured by our worth.

Seek your truth,,, Know your Truth... Measure your Truth by that which you have yet to Define...

[edit on 8/8/08 by rezial666]

Really??? Do you have any links about these existing He3 power sources? I thought that research is not that much advanced, huge fusion reactors based on ITER are not expected to be operational before 2050.

Dont want to rattle any cages here but it seems that an important point was missed here. I believe you should rephrase your rant to include the fact that the US spends billions of dollars a week on war. Now last time I checked, war isn't terribly good for one's health, unless you are the one benefiting from it.

In comparison to the amounts they spend on war every day, the money used to 'fake' a moon landing would be infintesmal.

[edit on 8/8/2008 by Kryties]

[edit on 8-8-2008 by zendog]

But you dont mind doing so.



There are a plethora of points that could have been raised but I chose one. Sorry to disappoint. If I only i had thought to include every wrong in my post. However, we are limited to 6500 characters maximum.



The party is over. You have turned up with a four pack of shandy and a red face.



Erm. Thank you. I think. Actually. What? Have you been drinking?

Did you read that on a lollypop stick?

The Moon pictures. God dammit!

Do they look real?

Is there life on the Moon?

Has there been a coverup?

Quit fighting shadows and get with the P G.



Ok. And stop making up words.

Taxi for Kryties.

EDIT: Kryties - if you want to discuss off topic stuff then U2U me please.

[edit on 8/8/2008 by skibtz]

I was simply responding to your likewise off-topic post earlier



But if you want my opinion then yes I believe there is some form of cover-up involving the moon landings, but no I do not believe they were faked - just 'altered' perhaps.





Actually its just misspelt I meant to spell it infinitesimal

Apologies for that earth-shattering mistake.

not sure if this has been addressed before on this particular pic; however, i know it's been a point of contention within the Apollo missions.

Why aren't the stars in the background??

Using pure logic, it's not logical.

Occam's razor="All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best."

Something just doesn't jive when we can CLEARLY see the stars through our atmosphere....

and we come full circle.. again. If, NASA removed the background, why? If they didn't where' are the stars.

Moon pictures are very odd and these pictures usually dont look like real life pictures. Usually horizon lines etc. looks very stupid, sharp lines etc. Here is one example. How they edited photos really?

reply to post by Komodo

---

You do not see stars during the day, right?

Same thing on those photos, they were taken during the day.

reply to post by hande

---

I don't understand what you mean.

Do you think the horizon looks wrong, is that it?

If you start branding peoples posts 'rants' then expect a kick in the balls.

Just don't start crying when it hurts.



I do want your opinion Kryties.

And I appreciate and respect your opinion on the topic.

I wont go branding it a 'rant' or the like.



Hmmm. I think I can forgive that.

Two Hail Mary's and an Our Father for you.

Peace.

reply to post by macr59

---

I dinked with it using nero and got close, but not similar results. I see what you mean. I wonder if any other pics do the same.

LMAO!! you've GOT TO BE KIDDING!!!!!!! and I'm not going to elaborate on this.. wow.. I'll let someone else do it for ya.. that line of thought is exactally like the Russians were able to go to the sun because it was night LOL

[edit on 8-8-2008 by Komodo]

It is from the length of the exposure, nothing more. Of course with a short exposure the camera wouldn't pick up dim stars.

No wait, let's not forget NASA faked everything right. They were smart enough to fake the moon landings but not smart enough to paint in stars, is that it?

reply to post by Komodo

---

If that is what you think then good for you, the next time you ask something I will let you find the answer for yourself, it may be harder (or even impossible) but I will not make the same mistake (trying to increase your knowledge) twice.

It's not what I think, it's what I know about earth and the moon missions. But, i don't want to get flamed for derailing the thread.. but, the backdrop should NOT be blacked out.. for a lack of a better word.

reply to post by Komodo

---

What color is the moon?
White? Good. Was it bright on the moon at the time the photos were taken?
Yes? Good.
Ever worked with photography?
The reason why the stars don't show up, and this has been covered many times, is because in comparison to the moon, they are not bright enough.
The camera compensated for the moon, a bright white object, and the stars were bled into the background.
As for the sharpness of the horizon, there's no atmosphere. On earth, the horizon is softened by our atmosphere. Dust, water vapor, and diffusion from the atmosphere itself blurs it.

turn gamma all the way down and bright and contest all the way up in ms photo editor intesting pic when you do it. my guess it looks like out line of buildings maybe at nasa training area at night maybe.