reply to post by WhatTheory
I find it helpful to read the posts of the people I'm debating. Give it a shot, and you'll be amazed at the results.
As I wrote in the post that's third from the bottom on the second page, and in answer to your question, YES - proper vehicle maintenance, starting
tomorrow, would save 1-3% gas mileage annually, on the national level. I'd wager good money that there won't even be an exploratory well
operational for a decade in the wake of the ban being lifted, and forget about seeing any of that oil on the market until at least 2030 according to
the DOE.
According to one estimate, the US consumed about 140 billion gallons of gasoline in 2004. That means we could expect to reduce consumption by between
1.4bn and 4.2bn gallons annually if we took Obama's advice. By the time the offshore wells start producing, the country would have conserved between
28bn and 84bn gallons of gasoline (assuming the wells start producing by 2028).
If you do the math, you will see that Obama's 'no-brainer' suggestion would effectively increase supply far sooner than lifting the ban, and it
would pay dividends every year.
It is a far better goal to reduce consumption than to increase production.
There are better solutions to achieving energy independence.
The oil companies and their cronies are using the climate in the US right now to push this thing forward. It's the worst sort of pandering to
people's fears and doubts, and while I CAN believe that people are falling for it, I wish they wouldn't.