McCain security throws out black reporter, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 5-8-2008 @ 12:51 AM by puzzled2
reply to post by LLoyd45



wow you read alot into this he was the only black guy sand with local pres reporters and the only 1 to be asked to move and when challenge they then removed 1 white person.

Are you sure you're an independent writer ?


reply posted on 5-8-2008 @ 02:04 AM by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by lee anoma



You're right, lee. Its possible that it wasnt because he was black.

However, you're basing that assumption off of the notion that it was mccain making the decision.

It wasnt mccains decision, just like it wasnt obama's decision to curb the two muslims.

Campaign people (in this case, security detail) make stupid mistakes like this because they think it's helping their candidate.

Till the story hits the news, and makes them look bad.

Sure, its POSSIBLE that it wasnt because he's black. But its also possible that he was.

And as i see it, it seems more accurate to say its because he was.

If he wasnt, wouldnt there be an explanation FROM the mccain campaign?

Or would it be easier to sweep it under the carpet.


reply posted on 5-8-2008 @ 02:12 AM by jam321
reply to post by Andrew E. Wiggin



I guess Black people are just that scary though, huh?


Are you saying that the reason they threw him out is because he was black and scary? Race baiting if you ask me or is it stereotyping. Do you have evidence to back this up?



reply posted on 5-8-2008 @ 03:36 AM by southern_Guardian
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to
post by lee anoma



You're right, lee. Its possible that it wasnt because he was black.

However, you're basing that assumption off of the notion that it was mccain making the decision.

It wasnt mccains decision, just like it wasnt obama's decision to curb the two muslims.

Campaign people (in this case, security detail) make stupid mistakes like this because they think it's helping their candidate.

Till the story hits the news, and makes them look bad.

Sure, its POSSIBLE that it wasnt because he's black. But its also possible that he was.

And as i see it, it seems more accurate to say its because he was.

If he wasnt, wouldnt there be an explanation FROM the mccain campaign?

Or would it be easier to sweep it under the carpet.



I don’t know why your so surprised Andrew, the anti-Obamanians are good at sweeping their hypocrisy under the rug. If they weren’t well then we wouldn’t have an issue getting these facts into their heads.

As for the information provided in the article, I think the fact the McCain camp didnt get onto this soon raises questions indeed. This is probably not related to race (hopefully) but it is no different of a situation with Obama and the two muslim women. Same situation. Same scenario.

As I said, some people are just good at sweep their hypocrisy under the rug.


reply posted on 5-8-2008 @ 03:46 AM by southern_Guardian
Originally posted by jam321
reply to
post by Andrew E. Wiggin



I guess Black people are just that scary though, huh?


Are you saying that the reason they threw him out is because he was black and scary? Race baiting if you ask me or is it stereotyping. Do you have evidence to back this up?


Honestly Jam, you fellas are always the ones playing the race card then the minute your confronted "oh im not playing the race card! you are! Obamas muslim thats not racist! this is different!", sounds childish eh?

The point of this thread highlights the hypocrisy coming from the anti-Obamanians here, this is the exact scenario with Obama and those muslim women yet people were quick to jump to conclusions, not to give an explanation a try, yet here this happens and as typical, its swept under the rug.

Media bias my ass, people were still using the liberal media BS back in 2003. Boy the media was certainly liberal that time aswell.

[edit on 5-8-2008 by southern_Guardian]


reply posted on 5-8-2008 @ 04:12 AM by jam321
It is not being swept under the rug. What should have happened is that he should have waited till he found out why the reporter was thrown. Andrew made it sound like they threw the guy out because he was black and I called him on it. He is making an assumption on facts he still don't know. And then later he derails his own thread by talking about Obama and the Muslim women thing.

The Muslim women were removed by campaign volunteers and the reporter was removed by the secret service. The same secret service that are obligated to protect Obama, McCain and Bush. Big difference if you ask me because the secret service did not see the Muslim women as a threat or they would have been the one to remove them.

Now personally i have no reason to play the race card. I'm sure you are correct that some people do. And to be frank I have spoken on Obama behalf too. I don't think he is a Muslim, I don't think his previous drug use is an issue, I do believe he is patriotic in his own unique way, I do think he deserves credit for playing to his strength and being articulate, and he is a US citizen.

There are things I don't like about Obama but thats a different story. But you must agree that this thread does sound like this reporter was throwing out because of his race and I think it is wrong to make this a race issue before we even know the reason. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to defend my view in a cordial manner. By the way the Muslim thing in my view was a mistake on his volunteers part, not Obama.

[edit on 5-8-2008 by jam321]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags