It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by inthemistandfog
If you scan through topics that have been in the front page and have lacked evidence, pay attention in the replies and you'll find many posts about lack of evidence, personal insults, and counters to these. Another similar "issue" is the early-conclusion-syndrome. There are threads where ATSer says e.g.: "hoax!", without much of explanation why, and later a noted number of ATSers keeps the case inconclusive. However, I'll go back to "the demander" case.
Originally posted by inthemistandfog
So a demander wants to keep a forum in quality, and clean from stories that cannot be supported with good enough evidence. I haven't learned much of what their reasoning for this is, and I would hope some replies to learn more. Below is something that I can come up.
Originally posted by inthemistandfog
So far I know that at least some have wished these non-evidence topics to non-exist, because they are wasting the readers time. Other motive is perhaps that they think that hoax attempts increases.
Originally posted by inthemistandfog
The demanders should change their way of tackling this in the first place, otherwise you find them in the hot topics again. DNFTT - "do not feed the troll", - is not far from the truth here. In most cases the only exception is that the OP is only a troll to a demander. As came clear before, try leaving the topic, and see if it gets attention. You can also try convince the mods privately or here on how the forum should work.
Originally posted by inthemistandfog
In my opinion a thread where even one tenth of the posts are related to things mentioned in this post is wasting the readers time more, than an OP posting a story without evidence. I mean.. you can just read the OPs first post, and often you'll learn whether he will post evidence later or not. If that info is being blurry, you can ask whether he or she is planning to post further evidence and in what time frame. If you are not getting an answer or evidence in few days, the odds for the evidence becomes slim. At this point I wish you would just leave the thread, and not let other people know what you think about people who dont post evidence.
Originally posted by inthemistandfog
...So if you know what I'm talking about, a 3 pages-thread turns into a long 8 pages thread. This reflects the whole topic and affects the interest what a reader has. For that reason, I sometimes just have to increase my scanning speed or even skip the most of the posts except the OPs. That is shame because in the thread, there certainly could be something I would like to read.
...
Originally posted by inthemistandfog
Some ATSers set certain limits and rules for threads, and if the thread(OP) disqualifies, the thread takes a whole new(old) twist with great number of posts concerning this.
If you scan through topics that have been in the front page and have lacked evidence, pay attention in the replies and you'll find many posts about lack of evidence, personal insults, and counters to these.
Who would it hurt that there were threads about sightings without pictures or anything else than the story ? With proper handling, it could go in the archives with one or two pages of replies on questions about details and such. This way you wouldn't find it from the hot topics either.
So a demander wants to keep a forum in quality, and clean from stories that cannot be supported with good enough evidence. I haven't learned much of what their reasoning for this is, and I would hope some replies to learn more.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
2. If no evidence can be given we at least establish their credentials. These could be professional or they might be simply a long standing membership on ATS without a history of fantastic stories.
The second option isn't proof of course, but it would mean i would personally give more credence to the story.
Originally posted by Demandred
i could have a genuine video recording of an alien walking around my house, crystal clear i could show it on here and there would still be all these hoax attackers shooting me down.