Originally posted by ignorant_ape


there you go - questions raised - and unanswered :

Originally posted by ignorant_ape you claim that the rocks are ` compacted ` by a massive impact force - i see no evidence of this in your photo - rather the pics of the hole show that there rocks are loose

second you claim that great heat has been applied to the area - i see no evidence of vitrification / fusion etc etc

IMHO the area looks raked or graded

lastly you claim it is aligned with ORION and SIRIUS ?

The Orion/Siruis connection is written in the material by the above-mentioned Croatian author of the book "Pag Venture Star". As well as the rocks fusion/head effect. It was also proven by Croatian scientists and geologists, who were researching the Pag Triangle.

Also, a lot of clairvoyant/clairsentient locals in Pag that were cooperating with us, confirm the Orion/Sirius connection.

And regarding my other sources - I'm sorry I cannot reveal them.

Originally posted by Onesimus
Mulder I don't know what's more intriguing your job or this triangle.

Also, is your agency (or whatever it is) monitoring the area for UFO activity or was this a one time investigation?

We are currently investigating it and the others agents are deployed to the area. But if this was classified, it would never have reached ATS in the first place.

Ah, thanks for the answer. I'd ask what the agency was but I get the feeling you wouldn't tell me.

Oh and It's been a while since I've read the original post but I guess the locals no longer utilize the site in any way? No groups visit it for any reason such as UFO worshiping or anything along those lines?

Originally posted by Onesimus
Ah, thanks for the answer. I'd ask what the agency was but I get the feeling you wouldn't tell me.

Oh and It's been a while since I've read the original post but I guess the locals no longer utilize the site in any way? No groups visit it for any reason such as UFO worshiping or anything along those lines?

I believe that there are some tourists now and then, but at the moment, there is little public interest in Pag Triangle. The road to the Pag Triangle is quite difficult and can only be done by walking. Or flying in a helicopter. No vehicle motorcycle can be used there.

Now that you are back, can you answer the my questions?

Just to remind you, these were left unanswered.

4 -

The triangle itself measures approximately 32 times 32 times 24 feet.

Could you please explain these measurements? Thanks.

5 -

Our GPS system suddenly shut down and the camera's batteries died. Just before the GPS shut down, we had connectrion with 5 more sattelites than we normally have.

So those photos were taken before entering the triangle? And how may satellites does your GPS usually "see"?

6 - Did you take the photos of the top of the hill before or after the batteries died?

7 - Why didn't you took bigger photos? Isn't the Olympus FE230 capable of bigger images?

Thanks.

Originally posted by ArMaP
Now that you are back, can you answer the my questions?

Just to remind you, these were left unanswered.

4 -

The triangle itself measures approximately 32 times 32 times 24 feet.

Could you please explain these measurements? Thanks.

Originally posted by ArMaP
5 -

Our GPS system suddenly shut down and the camera's batteries died. Just before the GPS shut down, we had connectrion with 5 more sattelites than we normally have.

So those photos were taken before entering the triangle? And how may satellites does your GPS usually "see"?

Many.

Originally posted by ArMaP
6 - Did you take the photos of the top of the hill before or after the batteries died?

Before, of course.

Originally posted by ArMaP
7 - Why didn't you took bigger photos? Isn't the Olympus FE230 capable of bigger images?

Thanks.

This question I must leave unanswered. Photos of this size will suffice for this forum.

[edit on 29-8-2008 by Spooky Fox Mulder]

When people start being selective over which questions they answer then you know something is suss.
The abuse of the title says it all "probably the best ufo hard evidence"..i dont think so...

Originally posted by bmdefiant

When people start being selective over which questions they answer then you know something is suss.
The abuse of the title says it all "probably the best ufo hard evidence"..i dont think so...

It would only be abuse if I wrote "the best UFO hard evidence". But I wrote "probably the best UFO hard evidence".

Great difference there.

If the guy had titled the thread differently, most of the responses would have been much less harsh.