Beheading victim was being eatin on bus!

Oh they are out there, you just don’t hear about it. It might be a pc thing, and it might be they were just not glamorous enough to get the spotlight. Watts was black and they think he killed over 100 victims, that makes him the most prolific serial killer in American history.

Here is a list to get you started:
archimedes.galilei.com...

YouTube Link

[edit on 3-8-2008 by Sonya610]

I am not usually one to make judgments of any kind, but I find it very hard here.
The fact that he killed the boy was bad enough, but to start eating him as well?

If I think he was on drugs.. it does not matter to me. It I think he might be severely mentally disabled it does not matter. To think he might be totally wack does not matter.

This man, whom ever he is should be done away with one way or another. He is obviously a danger to the world of unknown people . Which could put any of us at risk.

But I could bet you right now that nothing happens. He will get a slap on the wrist, put in a prison institution for the mentally deranged. He will have some therapy and in 5 to 10 years he will be proclaimed well and given his freedom back.

I truly feel for the parents and the family of this boy. We can only hope that he died quickly and with as little pain as possible.

reply to post by Sonya610

---

Thanks for the link! My old schoolmate made the list too. I'll have to watch the vid later.

i personaly think perpetrator of this crime took some "mdma" but most likely got burnt with a bad pill and got some yaba

you can find links on this substance and for a while due to its cheapens it was being used as a mixer for mass produced x . sometimes being sold in its place

the main difference with yaba is extended use (even staying up on it for 20+ hours) can manifest psychotic episodes.... normally in conjunction with hallucinations. as you can imagine this can lead to dire conciseness.

i remember watching a bbc documentary where they where interviewing people who killed their friends and family while on this substance... saying things like they turned to daemons etc before there eyes an they felt the need to kill them... a panic reaction to a strong and overwhelming hallucination


so this could be a possibility...

either that or just straight up mental head case

Funny, I would have thought on a conspiracy forum such as this that you all would have picked up on the possibility that the killer was brainwashed and under mind control.

Listen to the police tape. They refer to the suspect as "the badger". A code name from his handler?

Most of you already know that the majority of school shooters, mothers who drown their kids, or do crazy stuff like this bus attacker, are on anti-depressants or anti-psychotics. And I'm sure many of you are aware that those particular medications are being used to help "reprogram" people.

This guy is a manchurian candidate, no question about it.

Well after they killed these demons did they start chowing down on demon flesh? Panic is one thing, eating is another.

reply to post by Techsnow

---

NIce thinking and research.

At this early stage i think the best assumption would be that he somehow had a dose of PCP in his system.

Was it not written that victim and offender shared a cigarette before the incident? What if this cigarette was PCP-laced?

Certainly no real data here to suggest such a thing, but it is possible.

So the offender ingests PCP which has a negative reaction causing him to go crazy and hack the poor guy next to him.

I would think this is the most likely scenario. Though i find it interesting that Zorro was on at the time. Im not actually suggesting it but manchurian candidates always have a trigger, you never know...

The article said they "had a cigarette together". That does not mean they shared the SAME cigarette. That means they hung out and both had their OWN cigarettes. Sharing a cigarette with a stranger would just be weird.

The guy was already carrying a large knife and a pair of scissors. He was thinking about this, he didn't get slipped drugs.

reply to post by srsen

---

The victim and monster did not share a smoke previously, it was actually the victim and another witness.

And on a personal note, I don't think we'll ever know what was going through this monster's head. There is way too many variables, and it could or could not be drugs. And the theory of the monster having drugs in his system is also pure speculative. There's literally 100 different possibilities as to why this monster did what he did...although these threads have led to some very interesting discussions...

reply to post by Sonya610

---

But who really brings scissors on a murder rampage? The scissors just don't fit somehow. Just playing devil's advocate here, but maybe it's coincidence.

There was a woman who had her house raided by police because she kept buying large amounts of those tiny sealable bags that drug dealers use. Turns out she was selling a different sort of rocks, the real kind, at gem and mineral shows.

The scissors cold be coincidence, or since he was already nuts he may have just picked them up along with the knife.

As far as people (above) calling hima monster, I do not think that is fair. There is no evidence that this guy tortured his kids daily, or had a slew of victims. He could be a nice decent person that went nuts. It happens and that does not make the people monsters. Like those women that go nuts and kill their kids, when they get on anti-psychotic drugs and realize what they have done they can't live with themselves. They are sick they are not simply monstrous people.

"Model employee". Hunkered down with hunting knife and scissors. Hmmm.
Premeditated mayhem? I don't even want to go into the mind of a psycho killer. Some things are best left alone.
Run run run run away.

Let me apologize in advance for quoting almost your entire response, but I really need it in order to make one point qualify to the original statement in this case.

I rarely do this, but I whole-heartedly disagree with your assessment and mind-set. Were you to try to be convincing at least to ME what it is you're saying, you would have me agree that a SINGLE monstrous act, is not tantamount to a person being a monster, irrespective of their mental stability. This is one thing you could never convince me of, and I highly doubt much anyone else of either.

A person CAN be sick, AND be a monster, whether they have committed the act on family or not, and whether they have performed it multiple times or not.

A dog goes berzerk, mutilates and kills a child and we euthanize them, why? Because we know full well the possibility of repeat is extremely high. OF COURSE, the act may NEVER happen again during the dogs life. Does that mean that the singular monstrous act and the MORE disturbing likelihood of repeat did not justify the euthanizing of the dog? I would say it most certainly does.


AB1



[edit on 3-8-2008 by alphabetaone]

One isolated "monstrous" act does not make someone a monster. They may be dangerous and unstable, this is true. They may need to be locked up for the rest of their lives, or even executed, but it does not make them a monster. It sounds as if this person was a polite, loyal, hard working employee with a stable marriage. If he functioned well in his everyday life he may have had a glitch, that does not mean he is some horrible, evil, sadistic person that takes great pleasure in the pain and suffering of others.

Regarding the beserk dog, no "we" don't always euthanize them. Not where I live, if the kid was trespassing on the dog's property the law typically does not punish the dog or the owner. In some cases it has happened a few times with the same dog, still no prosecution. Now if the dog eats the kid in the kids backyard, or on the street, yeah that is a problem. I surely would not euthanize one of my dogs for eating a tresspasser in their own backyard.

Something is very strange with this one. I wonder if it was some kind of mind control and we may get more a more like this to convince the masses that they need to fear everyone.



He was like a robot...

20 meeelion bucks says this guy STARTED taking his "anti-depressive" medication.

hmmmm....



from - www.sntp.net...
and plenty of other news articles...
www.google.com...


or wait.
maybe he was taking Rumsfeld's coctail special... the infamous Tamiflu...


from -
www.abovetopsecret.com...



from -
www.naturalnews.com...


lawlzies..... "didn't take his meds" ....

....the Naive is STROOOOONG with this one...

-

[edit on 3-8-2008 by prevenge]

well who's the "monster" ... the woman who was completely fine before her "anti" psychotic drugs... OR the manufacturer of the drug?
who's the monster... the dog... or the person that abused it so that its brain is wired to "snap" when stressed?

-

I doubt if anti-depressants played a role in this case. But it is true, starting anti-depressants does raise the risk of suicide for one thing. Really really depressed people are so lethargic they don't have the energy or gumption, when the anti-depressants start to kick in they feel a tiny bit better and sometimes have enough energy to off themselves.

Though I think the withdrawls are often MUCH worse depending on the drug and the person. Paxil withdrawl causes electrical type shock effects, rapid mood swings, incredibly vivid (and often violent dreams), all sorts of stuff. It is really rough and symptoms can last for months. People stay on Paxil for years because they cannot handle the horrid withdrawls. That stuff is wicked, plus a lot of our already not so stable veterans are on it.

[edit on 4-8-2008 by Sonya610]

reply to post by LoneGunMan

---

Yeah, but you have to understand that real-life murder usually isn't like the movies. Kind of like the first time I had a gun pointed at me. Scary yes, but not the way I thought it would be beforehand.