School To Put Students In 'Prison Jumpsuits' As Punishment, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 07:22 PM by krill
ok iv read the dress code and i have a few problems with it and il now present them .

2. Hair must be neat and clean. Boys’ hair must not extend below the bottom of the collar of a dress shirt, below the bottom of the ear, or over the eyes.

(so no long hair, sience when is long hair a hinderance to education? and what about native americans for who long hair is a cultural tradition?)

4. Males must be clean-shaven if facial hair is noticeable. Sideburns cannot extend below the bottom of the ear.

(once again how does long side burns cause a problem to the learning process?)

7. All shirts will have a collar and sleeves. All shirts will be free of words and/or pictures and may have a logo of not larger than a 2 inch square. NO t-shirts are allowed except for Gonzales Apache spirit shirts which may be worn any day of the week. All shirts worn by males must be tucked in. Shirts worn by females must be tucked in if they are longer than the bottom of the hip.

(ok so you must wear dress or polo shirts with no decoration and if you want to wear a t shirt you have to pay for a t shirt from the school? thats a convienent money maker)

10. Oversized clothing or coats may not be worn. Sweaters, sweat shirts, and jackets must not fall below the back pockets.

(what the hell so you cant even wear a coat thats bigger then your shirt? how exactly does a coat longer then your shirt disrupt the learning process?)

12. Students shall not be permitted to wear hats, caps, sunglasses, sweatbands, or other disrupting apparel in any building on campus during school hours

(what about jewish kids? are they allowed to wear their yamachas?).

14. Males may not wear earrings. Females may wear earrings. No other body piercing jewelry of any kind will be accepted.

(ok why cant men wear earings? this isent the 50s many men now have pierced ears its common and even in almost all work places is accepted so that "preparring you for workplace" crap dont fly here)

23. No cargo pants allowed.

(why no cargo pants? this just seems astetic in purpose only considering sagging pants is outlawed, and all males must wear a belt i dont see how cargo pants is disruptive to a learning enviroment)


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 08:43 PM by krill
reply to post by Heike



the state is required to provide education for children in the district they live in when you live there you pay taxes for the upkeep, acsess to and continued operation of the public schools. so if its publicly funded i dont see how they can have arbitrary rules that dont have anything to do with safety or quality of education of the children.

banning clothes with obscene or violent images, clothing associated with local gangs, images containing drugs, liquer or tabacco , clothing that is revealing or sexualy sugestive are understandable. but dictating hair style, hair length, piercings that arent provocative, style of shirt that isent sexualy sugestive ect are all about control of style and demanding conformity and having nothing to do with the education process or safety.


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 08:54 PM by Heike
reply to post by krill



Having never had a child in school, I will decline to further debate with you on this particular subject in the interest of denying ignorance

That said, I thought there was a school council or something that got to vote on this stuff which included parents. I remember seeing something about that school's 08-09 dress code having been voted in .. ? If so, then the fact that even in a democracy or a republic, majority rules, applies. If not, I don't know what to say. My guess is it would be up to the parents of those children to fight it, or not.



reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 09:03 PM by krill
reply to post by Heike



the local school board which may have parents on it but it isent a requirement has to bow to a state education department. but for parents to fight it it would require lots of time to get others to organize and join the protest and then get a petition together and signed and then present it to the school board who votes on the matter.

if they vote no you can try all over again and if they still vote no you can take it to the state education department who are all usualy small time politicians and they will vote and tell you no again. this is a lot of time and resources most parents dont have to spare considering they work and have to take care of children, and run a household. now your other option is rund for super intendent.

of course that would mean if you won quiting your job for a office that wont pay much and isent garunted to be there after the next election. so thats not feasable for most parents eaither.


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 09:08 PM by TheCrankyOne
I just did a little statistics hunt. I didn't dig too deep. What I did find was the FBI crime statistics for 2003. A bit more digging would have come up with more current figures, but these are recent enough to make my point.
Los Angeles, CA: 12.7 violent crimes per 1000 people
Gonzales, TX: 10.5 violent crimes per 1000 people

Gonzales, Texas has a pretty bad violent crime rate for such a small town.

What does this have to do with the dress code? Practicality and psychology.

Oversize clothing, such as cargo pants and large coats, make it easy to conceal weapons and drugs.
T-shirts often bear logos. Most commonly, they bear athletic team logos. Why does this matter? Gangs often adopt athletic team logos as their own. Banning shirts like this helps cut down on rivalries. The same goes for hats and bandanas. I'm certain the school makes exceptions for religious headwear. What gang member is going to wear a yarmelke?

Gangs in small towns? Yes. They're becoming more common. The reasoning is simple. Families take their troubled children and ship them off to relatives in small towns in hopes that small town life will straighten them out. It doesn't work. Instead of becoming better behaved, these troublemakers bring the gang life with them. Small town youths crave big city excitement, and happily join in.

The rest of the dress code is simple psychology. If you look good, you feel good. What you wear has a large impact on how you act. Also, clean and simple clothing and hair styles required by the school help cut down on distractions. It's hard enough for teachers to keep students' attention without having to compete with a fashion show.

The students want to express their individuality by dressing as they like? Fine. They can do it outside of school. They're only in school for a few hours a day. Besides, they'll be expected to dress professionally when they get into the workforce. Would you take financial advice from someone who looks like they just rolled out of bed? Would you trust the judgment of a doctor who dresses like these students? I wouldn't.


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 09:51 PM by undiscoveredsoul
On this, I'm kind of on the fence. As a part of the "poor population" I know last year my 5th grade daughter got some crap from the school/teachers about her jeans. No they are not baggy and hangin off her rear end they were simply too long.

Now, she takes after me. I am only 5'1 on a good mmmkay so she is, if not the shortest girl in her class, one of them. She has hips now (puberty!!) and can no longer fit into childrens clothes sizes so we upped her to the juniors department. She takes from a 1-3 in waist size and they fit perfectly except they are about 3 or 4 inches too long....

A couple of teachers made comments and the principal sent a note home saying she coupldn't wear jeans that long EVEN IF SHE ROLLED THEM because it's baggy and ill fitting clothing are against dress code.....

When I spoke to him I explained how hard it is to find her size in petite, and even when I do petite is STILL about 2 inches too long.... he informed me I should take all her pants and have them tailored.... when then explained our finances in great detail and I asked him if he was gonna pay for it he promptly shut up.

He really had no back up. She was not dressing provacatively or in "gang colors" her clothing was not baggy the pants were simply too long because she is shorter in stature than her classmates. I thought callin it to her attention and to mine was in poor taste but in the end I won and not another word was said about it..

This year she will be attending middle school and from what i've heard they are even more strict in thier rules...

why don't they just buy uniforms for every kid, insist they wear THOSE and be done with it... would be a blessing for me!! ... not as much laundry and no extra expenses for a kid who outgrows clothes faster than I can buy em!!


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 11:21 PM by eradown
reply to post by Heike

Our factory school system does little to help all but 20% become literate in the western sense. The twenty percent usually are segregated in advanced classes ,so I do not consider their success as proof of the greatness of American public schools. I think the factory system of education does way too much harm to the other 80 percent who were not meant to be treated like herd animals. The American age of invention was brought about by the men like the Wright brothers who went to little red school houses and Thomas Edison who was educated at home. I do not knock public education students ,but more often than not, their successes are achieved inspite of not because of public schools.



[edit on 30-7-2008 by eradown]



reply posted on 31-7-2008 @ 12:15 AM by Heike
reply to post by eradown



I don't disagree with you on that point at all. I think our public schools today are a disgrace (and I have been a substitute teacher and an after-school enrichment program teacher).

I was merely trying to make the point that the GOAL of the American public school system is to provide "educated" workers to business and industry, thereby making the idea that the school environment is preparation for the work environment valid, as someone(s) had contested that idea.

One thing we haven't addressed is where are the parents in all of this? In my day (more years ago than some of you probably want to think about) the teachers did concentrate on teaching, and it was the responsibility of our parents to ensure that we were properly dressed and behaved properly in school. If I got in trouble in school (which I only did once), I was in double trouble when I got home. Today it seems like parents attack the teachers and the school in defense of their rebellious, rude, disrespectful, out-of-control, misbehaving children instead of disciplining them. And therein lies the REAL problem.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



UK Unemployment Corruption
  Posted 19 days ago with 78 member flags
Tibet on Fire...
  Posted 6 days ago with 63 member flags
Man Spends 2 Years In Solitary Confinement After DWI Arrest
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
Live Stream - Oakland - Tear Gas - Flash Bangs - Rubber bullets
  Posted 13 days ago with 58 member flags
A Ferocious Ron Paul tells it like it is about the TSA.
  Posted 16 days ago with 45 member flags
Your Views On \'Smacking\' children.
  Posted 12 days ago with 37 member flags