U.S. Intel: Iran Plans Nuclear Strike On U.S., page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 30 times


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 11:00 AM by WhatTheory
Originally posted by budski
Seems like they are trying to make people forget about
this NIE

This is the very same NIE that bush refused to take any notice of because "it doesn't say what I want it to".


Ok, now let's talk about reality.
First of all, the NIE report in question did say that Iran prior to 2003 did indeed have a nuclear weapons program. So if you are going to believe that it was halted, then you must also believe that they did actually have a nuclear weapons program. So everyone saying that Iran only wanted nuclear power plants instead of nuclear weapons is totally bogus right?

Also, before this latest NIE report the same group said they were developing nuclear weapons. And now after the report, they are changing their tune again. Basically, the NIE and those who wrote it don't know what they are talking about and cannot be trusted.

Reshaping the NIE report

If Iran is not currently attempting to build nuclear weapons (and we know they did in the past) then why did the UN just slap Iran with a third round of sanctions.

3rd Round of Sanctions


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 11:43 AM by dariousg
reply to post by WhatTheory



Yeah, and the sad thing is that they have a large population that has many power shortages and such because they don't have the same resources to generate it. A nuclear power plant would take care of many of these issues. But why can't they have one when we have dozens? Well, because it would scare the crap out of Israel. That's one reason. The other is because WE, our government, has labeled them as one of the 'Axis of Evil' *loud booming echoing voice*. Keep swallowing their poop.

What justification do we have in preventing other nations from creating power plants of nuclear capabilities? Because they will create a bomb and use it? Where's the proof?

Here's a question for you.

Name me one country who has created nuclear power plants and has actually dropped a nuclear bomb on another country? Not on military positions but on civilian populations? Oh crap, I forgot. There is one. AMERICA. The United States. And yet this government has the balls to try and tell a country that is starved for electricity that they cannot pursue the most logical means to generate that power? Okay.

And you probably don't see the hypocrisy in that.


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 11:52 AM by donhuangenaro
Originally posted by dariousg
reply to
post by WhatTheory



Name me one country who has created nuclear power plants and has actually dropped a nuclear bomb on another country? Not on military positions but on civilian populations? Oh crap, I forgot. There is one. AMERICA. The United States. And yet this government has the balls to try and tell a country that is starved for electricity that they cannot pursue the most logical means to generate that power? Okay.

And you probably don't see the hypocrisy in that.


also:

how many countries did USA attack in recent history and how many did Iran?

I think that the numbers speak for themselves and which country (between these two) is greater danger for the world peace...


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 12:00 PM by bodrul
reply to post by DimensionalDetective



did someone just get the Iraq papers on word and replace Iraq with Iran?
billions in research and other survalance methods
and this is what they come up with?

i bet we could get chimps come up with better intel


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 12:04 PM by bodrul
reply to post by WhatTheory



the answer is simple
why would a country that has the Raw meteial to produce the fuel for its reactors want to be relient on others?

Russia has proven what it can do when it gets pissed off, England and some eurpean countries are fine examples when Gas was cut off or limited due to russia having a hissy fit with a country over price.

the US is a fine example on what happens when it becomes heavily relient on others to meet its fuel needs

same with India/china and so on.

if Iran has any sanity they wouldnt allow them selves to be put in that position where they have to rely on others

now wasnt that a simple amswer

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 13 hours ago, 106 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 12 hours ago, 68 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 16 hours ago, 50 replies