U.S. Intel: Iran Plans Nuclear Strike On U.S., page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 30 times


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 08:27 AM by The Godfather of Conspira
reply to post by jtma508



No nation is going to initiate a nuclear (or other WMD) attack on the US. It won't happen. They all know (we publish it annually) our response doctrine. Any nation that launches at the US will have virtually all of its infrastructure, industry and military centers vaporized and forever uninhabitable.


Another valid point.

Ahmadinejad may be outspoken but he ain't stupid. The guy has a PhD, I doubt he would actually seriously consider launching a Nuclear attack on the US.

I love the way the media portrays this guys as some loose cannon, a man completely far gone to the point where he can't think rationally.
He's just bloodlusting for war.

When is the last time Iran started a war btw...?

Yeah he's going to Nuke the US and then watch his entire country vaporise....
Wow that would achieve so much for him.

Come on, how dumb do you think he is?
The Soviets never had the balls to authorise a first strike and they're the only nation that could actually have a decent chance at destroying America's nuclear offensive capabilities..

Iran is NOT going to nuke America. Even if they want to, their around 15-20 years away from having the capability to do so.
Come to back Earth people.


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 09:04 AM by The Godfather of Conspira
reply to post by TruthWithin



The article says that the missile could be launched close to America from a commercial boat with the same equipment on board as any other boat in the area. save for a missile launcher.


I'll say it again.

1. Iran hardly has a Navy to speak of.

2. I seriously doubt an Iranian missile boat or any other frigate could make it through the Persian Gulf without getting picked up by US radars, destroyers or aircraft.

3. That would be SOME commercial boat.
-The Shahab missiles weigh around 2 or 3 tons firstly.

-Secondly they require a huge complement of computers, guidance systems and radars to launch them accurately, there's no way you could fit that all onto some yacht or fishing trawler.

-Third, they need to be launched vertically, which means they need a launchpad with a bracing tower.
How the hell are you going to disguise that on a commercial boat?



Think it through, this doesn't add up.
It's another smear campaign to paint the Iranians in dark tones.

Saddam Hussein was supposed to able to launch chemical attacks on the US as well, we can see how likely that is now.

Don't drink the Kool Aid.

[edit on 30/7/08 by The Godfather of Conspira]


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 09:19 AM by budski
Seems like they are trying to make people forget about this NIE especially the paragraph which states:
A. We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons
program1; we also assess with moderate-to-high confidence that Tehran at a minimum is
keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons. We judge with high confidence
that the halt, and Tehran’s announcement of its decision to suspend its declared uranium
enrichment program and sign an Additional Protocol to its Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty Safeguards Agreement, was directed primarily in response to increasing
international scrutiny and pressure resulting from exposure of Iran’s previously
undeclared nuclear work.

from the same link posted above.

This is the very same NIE that bush refused to take any notice of because "it doesn't say what I want it to"

Same story, different country - he did this with Iraq as well.


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 09:22 AM by TruthWithin
reply to post by The Godfather of Conspira



Hey, easy pal, no one is drinking the Kool Aid - don't get your underwear all up in a bunch!

I was just befuddled at 3 pages of posts and 90% of them saying things like, "There is no way Iran could hit the US from all that distance" - Which tells me that no one read the article.

This scenario is actually not all that difficult to conceive. All they need is a cargo ship, which can carry 1000's of tons of cargo (far more than a relatively dinky 3 ton missile) and provide plenty of room for the necessary equipment). Iran has plenty of them.

Listen - I am not saying it will happen, I am saying it COULD.

I love how people like you jump on their high horse and cry BS when it appears you haven;t even thought this through, and probably you didn't even read the whole article.

I agree that this is fear mongering, but you can't just dismiss everything as fear mongering without thinking critically about everything.

Take it easy man, we are all on the same side here.


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 09:36 AM by Pinktip
blogs.abcnews.com...

Obama is on board now.........


But for a strike on the US, I'm more learly of the PTB as opposed to Iran.
9/11 redux.........02


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 09:43 AM by mybigunit
reply to post by TruthWithin



Yes I read the article and I dont buy the cargo ship deal. Think about this and think real hard ninja boy. You think Iran is going to drop a nuke in a ship send if over and let it go off? You dont think they realize if they did that we would wipe them out with a few nukes of our own? Cmon dude just the same as ohhh Iran is going to blow up Israel ohhhh...Ummm no you how religious they are? They are fanatics thats how religous they are and do you think they will blow up the holiest of all muslim sites the temple on the rock? Use your head we are all on the same team but it doesnt mean we all have the same common sense levels. Not a shot at you btw.



[edit on 30-7-2008 by mybigunit]


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 10:06 AM by mybigunit
reply to post by TruthWithin



Its also possible a meteor could hit the earth does that mean we all need to go blow up all the meteors in space. Or its possible to get hit by a car does that mean we stop driving? You right it COULD happen I concede this point to you but is it PROBABLE? No. I think we have a better change of a meteor hitting us. Iran does not want war WE want war and if you look at history since the first WW you will see we and the British have been making these peoples life miserable all for oil. I urge you to read up it will be mind blowing. Thats where the sheeple comment comes in. Because most sheeple will read this and right away assume Iran is going to attack us we need to be scared and or go and blow them up. No everyone sits back and thinks critically. Last I think about my unit all the time especially when I go pee.


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 10:08 AM by mybigunit
reply to post by BlackOps719



Them being wiped out wouldnt even be in hours it would be within minutes. People dont use this logic though they just soak up what the government tells them and heeds their words. Pathetic. Not to many people actually think like you and I




reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 10:28 AM by Harlequin
reply to post by The Godfather of Conspira



The only real concern to the USN would be the kilo class SSK`s which iran has.


reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 10:34 AM by jtma508
reply to post by Harlequin



They couls have all the subs they want. It won't change anything. The counterstrike would come so swiftly and from so many different vectors (submarine, surface ship, airborne and land-based) that they would barely have time to trun to Mecca. It would be over in a flash.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags