|
reply posted on 2-8-2008 @ 11:25 PM by ConMi27
|
Once again. We face with the ultimate truth. And what bothers me the most, and probably with a bunch of other people, is that this guy won't be the
last guy to say it, he wasn't the first, and I sure won't be the last person to realize this: Nobody is ever going to come out about it and the
media sure as hell isn't going to share their opinion on the matter. Because the so called 'news' ... doesn't it feel like they have to say what
the government tells them? That they wouldn't interveiw people who thought this, because that is what would make for a good news report. And then if
they measured or took a poll and put THAT in the article of how many people thought it was an inside job, SOMEBODY might possibly get the big enough
idea to go do some private investigating.
but God, if the police found out or the feds -- hint: whoever the hell knows the truth -- then you know they'd cover it up anyways.
The best thing to do in a situation that we're in with 'assuming' that were right and it was an iside job (which I was there when it happened. And
it was frightening really  ) is to tell others -- or lead them to things like this and allow them to make their own decision and when the time
comes -- if ever need be-- follow up on each other and stick together. I mean really, thats all you can do right?
I'd like to say were a match for the government, but really...  you know.
Just never give in. Never give up.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-8-2008 @ 11:29 PM by cashlink
|
I dont know if Jesse Ventura is a Demolition expert or not.
But it seems that Jesse has done his research on 911, and most people in the truth movement will agree with Jesse.
The evidence that has been found certainly proves it.
I dont think there is anything to Debunk here, Jesse Ventura has his on opinion from his own research.
What I am seeing in here is some of the Debunkers getting scared that people might listen to him and believe him.
This man gets media attention and maybe millions might start believe in him.
It dosent matter really what the mans back ground is, Jesse Ventura is a public figure.... and he can get the truth out.
I love it the debunkers are looking for anyway to discredit Jesse.
And we know who the "debunkers" are dont we.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-8-2008 @ 11:34 PM by GoldenFleece
|
reply to post by vfrickey
Would you vote with Charlie Sheen just because he says the government covered-up what really happened on 9/11? I sure wouldn't and I doubt there are
many who would. If anything, I can imagine him skewing the poll in the opposite direction. Look at the responses to Jesse Ventura. People have no
problem expressing their opposition to an independent former Navy SEAL/governor, let alone an actor who's widely perceived as a left-wing
"conspiracy theorist." I've even heard "shut up and sing" responses to ultra-patriot Bruce Springsteen.
In any case, I didn't cite that poll to prove or even suggest anything scientific. I posted it in conjunction with a scientifically valid poll that
says 62% of the American public believes the government had specific warnings of the terrorist attacks, but chose to ignore those warnings -- in
response to a poster who claimed there were only "a few hundred people who don't believe the official story."
Now you can play with semantics and cite all the legal boilerplate you want. The fact is, a significant portion of the public has serious concerns
about the validity and honesty of the government's official 9/11 story. After the USS Maine, Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, Operation Northwoods, JFK, RFK,
MLK, Gulf of Tonkin, USS Liberty, Lockerbie, TWA 800, Oklahoma City and "WMDs" in Iraq to name but a few, they've got good reason to be
suspicious.
If the government doesn't want to be the prime suspect for every terrorist incident, war or tragic event, maybe they should try telling the truth
every once in a while.
[edit on 3-8-2008 by GoldenFleece]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-8-2008 @ 09:48 AM by michael
|
The whole " 4/5ths kerosene jet fuel vs. steel/propane vs. your barbecue grill" argument is the simplest way to start the debate with our friends
and relatives. Do I know the whole story? Who, what, when, where, why and how? No. But something is fishy, and a lot of people seem to have had an
interest in making this horrible day happen. Follow the money, then hopefully we can have some trials. The guilty should hang. But that's just my
Texas logic talking. Maybe it would be more fitting to incarcerate them in the general population. I bet we could make room by clearing out some of
the folks that shouldn't have ever been jailed in the first place.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 3-8-2008 @ 12:36 PM by tide8888
|
reply to post by cashlink
I really cant imagine someone not wanting the real truth. I dont believe that the so called debunkers are scared by anyones comments. Just because
someone disagrees with the conspiracy and goes out of their way to prove those claims wrong, doesnt mean that person doesnt want the truth. I
personally dont believe there was some vast conspiracy. However when I hear something I will, as many of the so called debunkers do too, try to
disprove it. When I cannot disprove it, is when I will start to wonder. Building 7 makes me curious. Although it doesnt make me believe that there
is a whole conspiracy behind 911. I will also admit that my views definitly lean one way. But those views also are not set and can be changed.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-8-2008 @ 12:24 AM by vfrickey
|
Originally posted by Macphisto
Interesting read on Jesse. Is he a liar? Hmmmm.
www.cursor.org...
Thanks for posting that. Puts a different shine on things.
Just to be sure who was calling BS on Ventura, I ask.com-ed the piece's author, Bill Salisbury - turns out he's CMDR Bill Salisbury, a no-# SEAL
from those days, all the way up to 1982:
warboats.org...
If you're interested, I found another piece by Salisbury on Ventura's claim to have hunted men down while serving in Vietnam;
www.cursor.org...
The funniest thing in the article is the quote from GOVERNOR Ventura's press guy, John Wodele, when asked to appear on Hannity and Colmes with
Salisbury to answer Salisbury's questions about his war record -
"When Fox asked Ventura to respond, Wodele wrote: "The only thing we have ever said is that the UDT and SEAL designation is interchangeable and we
don't have any further comment."
I have a little trouble myself believing a SEAL would have said, back before the merger of the UDTs into the SEALs, that there was no difference
between SEALs and frogmen. None of the SEALs I've spoken to would have been that unassuming.
I'd say all of this goes to Ventura's credibility. If he wants to drag in the whole can of worms about whether he really WAS a SEAL, that's his
decision - but it doesn't make me believe him when he makes statements about 9/11.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-8-2008 @ 03:32 AM by GoldenFleece
|
IMO, this whole UDT/Navy SEAL "controversy" has been manufactured as a way to discredit Ventura. It appears to be much ado about nothing.
As the Official U.S. Navy Seal Information Web Site states, all SEAL teams were initially formed entirely from UDT personnel and all UDTs were later
redesignated as SEAL Teams. Even their Vietnam mission descriptions are interchangeable:
Responding to President Kennedy's desire for the Services to develop an Unconventional Warfare (UW) capability, the U.S. Navy established SEAL
Teams ONE and TWO in January of 1962. Formed entirely with personnel from Underwater Demolition Teams, the SEALs mission was to conduct counter
guerilla warfare and clandestine operations in maritime and riverine environments.
SEAL involvement in Vietnam began immediately and was advisory in nature. SEAL advisors instructed the Vietnamese in clandestine maritime operations.
SEALs also began a UDT style training course for the Biet Hai Commandos, the Junk Force Commando platoons, in Danang.
In February 1966, a small SEAL Team ONE detachment arrived in Vietnam to conduct direct-action missions. Operating out of Nha Be, in the Rung Sat
Special Zone, this detachment signaled the beginning of a SEAL presence that would eventually include 8 SEAL platoons in country on a continuing
basis. Additionally, SEALs served as advisors for Provincial Reconnaissance Units and the Lien Doc Nguoi Nhia, or LDNN, the Vietnamese SEALs. The last
SEAL platoon departed Vietnam on 7 December 1971. The last SEAL advisor left Vietnam in March 1973.
The UDTs again saw combat in Vietnam while supporting the Amphibious Ready Groups. When attached to the riverine groups the UDTs conducted operations
with river patrol boats and, in many cases, patrolled into the hinterland as well as along the riverbanks and beaches in order to destroy obstacles
and bunkers. Additionally, UDT personnel acted as advisors.
On May 1, 1983, all UDTs were redesignated as SEAL Teams or Swimmer Delivery Vehicle Teams (SDVT). SDVTs have since been redesignated SEAL Delivery
Vehicle Teams.
www.sealchallenge.navy.mil...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-8-2008 @ 10:18 PM by GoldenFleece
|
Originally posted by tide8888
Building 7 makes me curious. Although it doesnt make me believe that there is a whole conspiracy behind 911. I will also admit that my views
definitly lean one way. But those views also are not set and can be changed.
Wouldn't the government's (NIST's) inability to explain WTC 7 make someone more than a little curious?
And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-8-2008 @ 02:48 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
 
For anyone to say that they think a bunch of arabs with box cutters hi-jacked those planes and had enough talent to fly them the way they did is a
complete idiot.
There is no way those buildings fell the way they did because of Jet Fuel. There is no way building 7 could have fallen in any way shape or form
without controlled demolition. Building 7 sustained no damage enough to make it fall from the other buildings falling.
I can't believe there are people defending the official report. This was so incredibly obvious, the Bush administration had EVERYTHING to do with the
entire 9/11 incident. How can anyone not see it?
What reason does anyone have to ignore the obvious?
Any debunkers who spend their time slamming Mr. Ventura and questioning his credentials are certainly doing it just to wind everyone up here on ATS.
The questions they pose, over and over asking for his experience, and proof that he has actually blown up a 110 story building are so childish,
ignorant, and self incriminating as to them being an immature little imp, who doesn't have enough brains to melt ice outside in the summer, that I'm
surprised that anyone responds to their posts.
For the inteligent people here on ATS to waste time responding, is just taking time away from inteligent discussions we could have, which are worth
reading and responding to.
I would like to see the people here for real discussions ignore the antagonistic people who will find something wrong with everything just to do it.
There is clearly no thought or rationale behind what they do. They simply argue for the sake of arguing. They do it to make themselves feel as if they
are more inteligent or superior to the real concerned citizens of this country who have a genuine problem with the fact that our government may have
had something to do with 9/11.
There is much more than a reasonable doubt that the government DID have something to do with it. There are so many things that point to massive
involvement that it can not be ignored. I believe 100% that the government had EVERYTHING to do with it. I'm not even going to cite the painfully
obvious facts that put 99% of everything the government claims as a total lie.
There are so many obvious things and so many ridiculous explanations by the OFFICIAL people that the debunkers of conspiracy are simply ignoring
reality and have their minds made up before even considering the facts.
Furthermore, I am willing to bet that ALL of the debunkers are people who are non humanitarian people who like the idea of our military killing people
of other countries as if it's the same thing as winning a football game. Winning a fight or winning a contest of any kind is something of a macho
contest. This is due to their lack of intelligence.
To defend your country or anyone who is in the wrong regardless of who it is, just because it is the side you're on is a true sign of ignorance.
Wrong is wrong no matter how you slice it. It's like a parent defending their child for beating up another child in school over a simple arguement
over an opinion in history class.
The only way to make something better, to have moral fiber and integrity, to be respected in the eyes of all is to admit when something is wrong and
correct it. To deny you're wrong and to defend actions that are clearly moraly wrong just make you look ridiculous in everyone elses eyes.
Just because some people in this country condone what Bush and his administration have done, and believe the excuses they've given and their
explanations, doesn't mean that it isn't obvious to the rest of the world.
The damage they've done to this country's reputation and the respect we once had is going to affect us negatively for many years to come.
Someone in this world has to have the wisdom and integrity to stand for what is right, which supercedes greed and misguided muscle. Respect not fear
will keep people from attacking us.
Bully's never win in the end.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 4-10-2008 @ 11:44 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
My letter re: getting some facts straight about Jesse Ventura. If you have any doubts, read the citations.
Dear Milan,
Regarding your 14 June 2008 article on fake Navy SEALs: http://www. post-gazette.
com/pg/08166/889910-85. stm,
I applaud your article but feel it necessary to alert you of one inconsistency that must be addressed. You mentioned
Jesse Ventura is an authentic Navy SEAL. This is untrue.
Jesse Ventura is a fake SEAL. He never "hunted man", as he asserts. Jesse did serve overseas on UDT 12
alongside Amphibious Marine Battalions, but evidence largely suggests that as part of a UDT, he never even set foot
on land in Vietnam, Cambodia or Laos; rather, he spent the majority of his service on ships in the South China
Sea, and did in fact land in the Philippines, where his real name (Janos) appears on the base basketball team's
roster. Note that real SEALs did not have much time for recreation in the Vietnam War.
http://www. cursor. org/stories/seal_or_udt_4. htm
Although certain organizations stand by his ludicrous claim that he rates the SEAL title, spokesmen for these
organizations tread lightly when in the public eye. The political ramifications of exposing Jesse, along with the
possible damage to the SEAL brand could be motivators for these positions. Privately, however, Jesse is
universally mocked by the entire special operations community. Even nowadays, when his name is mentioned in
conversation, someone will chuckle and say, "You mean the fake SEAL?". A few descriptive phrases usually
follow.
Curiously enough, Jesse chooses never to cite specific experiences while in the Teams, although he rarely
misses an opportunity in debate to flaunt his "SEAL experience" as a qualification with which to trump his
adversary. This is a common tactic used by imposters who must stick to generalities or commonly known tidbits in
order to avoid exposure. If asked for specifics after he brings the subject up, Jesse feigns a solemn look and
dupes the questioner into thinking his memories must be too painful to recant. I have never seen a real operator act in
such a way.
http://www. youtube. com/watch?v=Sm2weLS5gJ4
http://www. colbertnation.
com/the-colbert-report-videos/165019/april-07-2008/jesse-ventura
What is particularly unacceptable is Jesse's usage of his fraudulent "SEAL experience" as his sole
qualification to back up loony 9/11 conspiracy theories.
http://video. aol.
com/video-detail/jesse-ventura-on-opie-and-anthony-04-08-08s-video/861741154
Jesse's assertions of government involvement (specifically with respect to 7 WTC's collapse) are
naive and highly speculative. Nonetheless, few if any will question what specific insight "SEAL status"
gives him into the 9/11 tragedy. No one wants to upset the big guy.
Numerous recent official reports outlining the reasons for the collapse of 7 WTC, drafted by civil engineers and
physicists, put Jesse's claims to rest.
http://www. civil. northwestern. edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/466. pdf
Of course, Jesse does not care about this because Jesse lives in a parallel universe where he is a SEAL war hero
comparable to the likes of Dick Marcinko, fighting a secret war against the corrupt, murderous American
government... where only he possesses the knowledge that can save the world. Sounds a bit like the psyche of a
professional wrestler.
Why do I care about any of this? As a veteran, I am sickened by the growing number of Jesse's supporters who
refer to his SEAL status as a means to support his moronic 9/11 conspiracy theories. These people have created
websites to support him for Senator and even President. Jesse himself alluded to the possibility of a "surprise
run" for the '08 election. Clearly, this is a another tall tale, as the traitor and liar has defected to Mexico due to
the "loss of freedoms" in America.
Jesse Ventura is a disgrace to the uniform, true Quiet Professionals (especially the SEALs), and this
country. The lunatic continues to babble about disproved, misguided theories of America's Darkest Day,
while dragging the legacy of all veterans, living and fallen, deployed and stateside, through the muck.
People deserve to know about this fake SEAL.
Respectfully submitted.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-10-2008 @ 11:54 PM by SuperViking
|
Obviously, anyone with a half a brain knows that it wasn't an 'inside job'. But that doesn't mean threads like this are pointless at all. There
is a burning question here, one that is of interest to people now and will be to people in the future. That is: Why were people in the early 21st
century so predetermined to believe ANYTHING that goes against "The Man"? There is a sizable swath of people that is willing to believe anything,
no matter how dumb, as long as it goes against the "official" story.
If the CIA said I went to high school in Chicago (I did), you'd immediately have a couple threads here and a blog or two around the internet
insisting, in the face of all evidence, that I did not.
This thread and, moreover this site, is intensely interesting. Not for the asinine conspiracy theories it brings up, but for the asinine people that
believe them.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2008 @ 12:36 AM by Kryties
|
Originally posted by SuperViking
Obviously, anyone with a half a brain knows that it wasn't an 'inside job'.
I consider myself to be a relatively intelligent person and I happen to believe that 9/11 was an inside job. As do many many other intelligent people.
Given the American governments past I am much more inclined to believe that 9/11 was orchestrated by the American government rather than a bunch of
cave-men conspiring to fly planes into a building.
If the CIA said I went to high school in Chicago (I did), you'd immediately have a couple threads here and a blog or two around the internet
insisting, in the face of all evidence, that I did not.
That is the most ridiculous logic I have ever heard.
This thread and, moreover this site, is intensely interesting. Not for the asinine conspiracy theories it brings up, but for the asinine
people that believe them.
So what is your agenda here?
[edit on 5/10/2008 by Kryties]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2008 @ 02:20 PM by SuperViking
|
Originally posted by Kryties
Originally posted by SuperViking
Obviously, anyone with a half a brain knows that it wasn't an 'inside job'.
I consider myself to be a relatively intelligent person and I happen to believe that 9/11 was an inside job. As do many many other intelligent people.
Given the American governments past I am much more inclined to believe that 9/11 was orchestrated by the American government rather than a bunch of
cave-men conspiring to fly planes into a building.
I'd think the government did it too if the other option was cavemen.  If you really think Middle Easterners are "cavemen" really says a
lot.
If the CIA said I went to high school in Chicago (I did), you'd immediately have a couple threads here and a blog or two around the internet
insisting, in the face of all evidence, that I did not.
That is the most ridiculous logic I have ever heard.
I thought you frequented this site?
This thread and, moreover this site, is intensely interesting. Not for the asinine conspiracy theories it brings up, but for the
asinine people that believe them.
So what is your agenda here?
Laughs.
[edit on 5/10/2008 by Kryties]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2008 @ 02:47 PM by Kryties
|
Originally posted by SuperViking
I'd think the government did it too if the other option was cavemen.  If you really think Middle Easterners are "cavemen" really says a
lot.
OK, since you asked...
If you have watched the videos of "Osama Bin Laden" you will notice they are sitting on dirt floors, surrounded by rock, they are also men. From
this I derived 'cave-men'. Any serious person wishing to take on the US would not broadcast from a damned cave unless that is where they were set up
and training, hence lesser technology hence cave-men. Really not that hard a logic to follow dude.
I happen to have lived in the Middle East for several years and I know probably better than you do that there are some very rich areas/countries. But
on the flipside of that there is a good sized chunk that is well below the poverty line, depraved even.
[edit on 5/10/2008 by Kryties]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2008 @ 03:02 PM by SuperViking
|
Originally posted by Kryties
Originally posted by SuperViking
I'd think the government did it too if the other option was cavemen.  If you really think Middle Easterners are "cavemen" really says a
lot.
OK, since you asked...
If you have watched the videos of "Osama Bin Laden" you will notice they are sitting on dirt floors, surrounded by rock, they are also men.
From this I derived 'cave-men'. Any serious person wishing to take on the US would not broadcast from a damned cave unless that is where they were
set up and training, hence lesser technology hence cave-men. Really not that hard a logic to follow dude.
I happen to have lived in the Middle East for several years and I know probably better than you do that there are some very rich areas/countries. But
on the flipside of that there is a good sized chunk that is well below the poverty line, depraved even.
So are you trying to imply that OBL is under the poverty line? That his operation doesn't have money?
Somehow, I doubt you know more about the Middle East than I, btw.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 5-10-2008 @ 03:25 PM by Soloist
|
Originally posted by Kryties
If you have watched the videos of "Osama Bin Laden" you will notice they are sitting on dirt floors, surrounded by rock, they are also men. From
this I derived 'cave-men'. Any serious person wishing to take on the US would not broadcast from a damned cave unless that is where they were set up
and training, hence lesser technology hence cave-men. Really not that hard a logic to follow dude.
Here's some logic for you :
Those "cave men" happened to whoop all over the Soviet Army until they retreated.
If you are trying to infer these "cave men" could not have hijacked some planes (they've been doing this for awhile now, hmm) and flown them into
buildings, then I would say that's an insult to "cave men" and terrorists the world over.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
<< 12 13 14 15 >>
|
|
|