It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LestatG
(Ps Who or how is the subject matter decided)
Originally posted by MemoryShock
...meaning you won't know or choose what you'll be debating about.
Originally posted by AshleyD
'Ashley! You'll be arguing the pro position for why abortion is an excellent choice for birth control! Ashley! You'll be arguing the point Jesus was a false Messiah! Ashley! You'll be arguing the position that Obama will make the best president in U.S. history!'
Fighters' Bill of Rights
No fighter may be assigned a position without his or her consent if arguing that position would constitute any of the following:
(1) Blasphemy or another religious offense.
(2) A violation of any law to which the fighter is subject.
(3) A violation of the verifiable rules of any other organization to which the fighter claims membership or affiliation.
No fighter may be assigned a position or topic without his or her consent which would be emotionally traumatic. This includes but is not limited to:
(1) Debate involving any type of abuse to which the fighter, the fighter's loved one, or the fighter's gender, ethnic group, nation, religion, etc has been subject.
(2) Debate involving a painful disability or adverse condition to which the fighter or the fighter's loved one is or has been subject.
Ok, seriously. It looks fun but like so much work. What if we wanted to challenge a fellow newbie to a practice debate?
Originally posted by MemoryShock
We already have an ear and mind towards keeping the Fighters away from debating something they are totally against...within reason...
You may do that...in the form of a challenge match. We are always open to challenge matches and encourage them, as a matter of fact.