What gets me with a lot of the Fox and major network programming is how it is so formulatic in its representation of gender roles...beautiful girls should be courted by intelligent men, intelligent women should settle for perma-singleness, childless or raising any child alone. I have no objection to smut, or the odd double entendre, but I do not necessarily feel that a news programme is the best place for that to be promoted, unless that is what you are promoting.

From what I can gather though, given the general hypocrisy of many Christian sects, I feel that Fox are being fairly reflective of that group of people, that audience seems only too eager to immerse itself in sleaze. Though they soon cry foul when caught in the act.

It has just gotten so bad now that the 24/7 news networks and Fox especially are putting this in our daily news and I use the term news lightly.I would hardly call this news would you?They sicken me now more than ever.I mean think about it....mom and dad get home and more times than not the TV will be on in the background with the news on for the parents and this is going on.The kids are playing and you would think it would have a subliminal effect on them.I have said it before it seems like every where you look these day's you see some advertising involving sex.But yet no one can figure out why we have so many children having children.

Porn? What? Where? I wanna see.

Originally posted by CaptGizmo
The kids are playing and you would think it would have a subliminal effect on them.I have said it before it seems like every where you look these day's you see some advertising involving sex.But yet no one can figure out why we have so many children having children.

A point very well raised. Children are not born sexualised, that is a part of the growing process and ideally should not occur until puberty. Premature sexual awareness, while not necessarily of permanent or dtrimental damage, does lead, IMO, to earlier full sexual intercourse and as such is accompanied by a lack of knowledge of the fundamentals involved. Of course the current socio-political solution is earlier sex education, but this is treating the symptom in my opinion, not the disease.

I gave you a star
good find

This of course is true ,it is a way to draw in the younger people sub 30 ,They know it is that age group that they need to corrupt the minds of,with their lies.
this is the up and coming generation the current generation is already corrupted beyond belief in the USA.
While there are some people incorruptible,and I use the term corrupt and corruptible( meaning their minds are being corrupted with a false reality) in an extreme way.

when 80% of USA citizens believed that Saddam had caused 911 and still today there are people in the USA that still believe that.
Well there is a problem in America,citizens of the USA live in a bubble of quasi reality. Propaganda in the education system lies and or omissions in the history books, much like a car salesman will use females to make men subconsciously believe that a fancy car will net them a fancy female.So too
will a fancy female make the viewer believe this is the reality that makes sense.

I pity the poor females more than the dupes here ,for they will grow old and understand the sin of vanity. the dupes can be deprogrammed !


Concerning the MSM News casters,pundits etc..
where did these knuckle heads come from A CIA over the hill field agents
and why have all real news casters been fired!

[edit on 2-8-2008 by solo1]

On Thursday's or Friday's broadcast Bill-O was going to discuss the rise of "girl-on-girl action", I swear, if that's not a quote, then it's close to it. I didn't watch it but I am quite sure there was the requisite footage.

His show is the worst offender for sexual content and he's a perv, IMO. Additionally, most of their female anchors are blondes...hmmm who is doing the hiring - Hugh Hefner?

I don't think it's directed at thirty-somethings and under at all. They have an actual chance of interfacing with actual females. No, I think it is directed at frustrated GOP grandpas who have secret sex fantasies.

Now, if the male anchors start getting hotter, then I know my theory is correct...what with all of the gay GOP sex scandals...



[edit on 2/8/2008 by kosmicjack]

Originally posted by kosmicjack
On Thursday's or Friday's broadcast Bill-O was going to discuss the rise of "girl-on-girl action", I swear, if that's not a quote, then it's close to it. I didn't watch it but I am quite sure there was the requisite footage.

His show is the worst offender for sexual content and he's a perv, IMO. Additionally, most of their female anchors are blondes...hmmm who is doing the hiring - Hugh Hefner?

I don't think it's directed at thirty-somethings and under at all. They have an actual chance of interfacing with actual females. No, I think it is directed at frustrated GOP grandpas who have secret sex fantasies.

Now, if the male anchors start getting hotter, then I know my theory is correct...what with all of the gay GOP sex scandals...

[edit on 2/8/2008 by kosmicjack]

Finally someone else notices this, I've been pointing this out to all my friends but they don't seem to see it. Everytime I watch Bill O'Reily I notice that almost 95% of his correspondants and anchors are very good looking women and usually blonde.

While I realize this is the norm for most News Programs, I just find it funny that theres an Old Man surrounded by all these hot blonde women.