[HOAX]They're real.[HOAX]

page: 1
28
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:33 AM
link   
So I don't....or I should say I didn't have any interest in UFO's or aliens. That changed today. I saw a UFO. I kind of saw it anyways, it was transperant. Right now I'm totally manic. I can't stop thinking about this. I think I might be having a break down. Woah. This just opens up a whole different world of thinking. I've spent the past hour or so reading the forums, getting a feal for the community. I'm sure a lot of people aren't going to believe me, but I just hope no one attacks me.

Anyways, here is the story. I am on vacation this week(I guess the aliens visit during work hours). I took my dogs outside and I didn't even see this thing. My dogs started barking like crazy and they were looking at the sky. I looked up. I didn't see anything at first, but then I saw it moving very very slow across the sky. I debated on going into the house to get my camcorder, as video is more credible than a picture. I decided to take one picture with my cell then go grab my camcorder. After I took the first picture the "ufo" darted behind my house. I ran back there and was able to get another shot off while the ufo raced into the sky.

I'm a seasoned vet on the WoW forums, and I know the routine. "Pics or it didn't happen". Here we go....


First picture taken,



img513.imageshack.us...


Second picture, after running behind house, the craft was slowley going straight up into the sky. No noise at all. As it go higher then center glowed bright purple. I tried to snap a third pic but it just shot up in the blink of an eye.

img519.imageshack.us...





[edit on 28-7-2008 by trog81]

[edit on 28-7-2008 by trog81]


Admin Note: The story has been picked apart by the members, the original poster signed up under a second account while on ignore and tried to start a new thread with new (and different) pics. After finally contacting an admin, he's backpedalling and stating that he has crackhead neighbors who are unreliable but will verify that the ufo was there.

[edit on 30-7-2008 by Crakeur]




posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:36 AM
link   
im not gonna lie to you. that looks like nothing. you cant see any distinguishing features and it could easily be a spot on the camera. you need a better camera because these photos don't prove anything. for some real proof, next time you see it shoot it outta the sky



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:36 AM
link   
OK you peaked my curiosity and the pics say 1600 X 1200 resolutions, but they are postage stamp size when clicked on, not much in the way of visual proof



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:37 AM
link   
Those are only thumbnails. Can't determine much from those.

Can you link up some larger pics please?

Thank you.



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:38 AM
link   
Yeah, I posted the pictures wrong. Try going to the url until I figure out how to post the correct pictures and not the thumbnails.

img513.imageshack.us...


img519.imageshack.us...



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:39 AM
link   
Sounds very interesting. Someone else posted on here a couple of months ago reporting something very similar.
Could you post some bigger pics because when i click on them they appear the same size as the ones showing on the thread. Can't make out any details!!



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:40 AM
link   
Here are his corrected links..

(Hint: just remove the .th part of the url)

Image 1

Image 2

Edit:
Whoo.. fast update. Not bad at all.


[edit on 28-7-2008 by Absence of Self]



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:42 AM
link   
Hmmm looks interesting. I'll wait for the experts


[edit on 28-7-2008 by Deaf Alien]



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:42 AM
link   
OK Very good thanks for editing your post
Thank God for photobucket


The first picture looks like is was taken from inside a house and you caught a reflection of a light fixture on the window glass.

The second one looks photoshopped from tthe first.

IMHO

SLAY



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:42 AM
link   
Hmm if real.. .WOW

I can't see any pixel bleeds or anything that suggests tampering but Ill have to zoom in and open them in my photo editing software and take a look

but very very interesting!



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:43 AM
link   
First picture, interesting. Object blends rather well into the sky.

Second photo, reminds me of a 3D mesh of a torus (doughnut) with a bit of translucent shading as texture. It seem artificial to me, like something slapped in Photoshop. In picture summary, it says "Creation Software Adobe CS for Windows."



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:43 AM
link   
reply to post by trog81
 


still looks like a thumb print, or a screen problem. but the bigger pictures do look better. if they are real then it answers some questions.

its transparent making it harder for people to see so i guess thats why images are scarce and reports are shaky.

good job on posting pictures though. most people make up a story and go for the "im getting my scanner tomorrow, ill have the pictures up then" so atleast you got some evidence ( as unclear as it is)



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:44 AM
link   
Well, here is all the EXIF data before people start in on you




Here's the full data:

XMP

Create Date 2008:07:28 11:28:39-05:00
14 minutes, 4 seconds ago
Creator Tool Adobe Photoshop CS Windows
Date/Time Original 2008:07:28 10:35:24-05:00
1 hour, 7 minutes, 19 seconds ago
Derived From Document ID adobe:docid:photoshop:66a2fc1c-5cb8-11dd-8c17-c133522959fc
Derived From Instance ID uuid:2d44ec48-5cb9-11dd-a687-8eeff4b9b281
Document ID adobe:docid:photoshop:2d44ec4b-5cb9-11dd-a687-8eeff4b9b281
Format image/jpeg
History

Metadata Date 2008:07:28 11:28:39-05:00
14 minutes, 4 seconds ago
Modify Date 2008:07:28 11:28:39-05:00
14 minutes, 4 seconds ago

EXIF — this group of metadata is encoded in 3,566 bytes (3.5k)

Color Space sRGB
Components Configuration YCbCr
Compression JPEG (old-style)
Date/Time Original 2008:07:28 10:35:24
52 minutes, 41 seconds ago
Exif Image Size 1,600 × 1,200
Exif Version 0220
Make Research In Motion
Camera Model Name BlackBerry 8310
Modify Date 2008:07:28 11:28:39
1 hour, 45 minutes, 56 seconds ago
Orientation Horizontal (normal)
Resolution 72 pixels/inch
Software Adobe Photoshop CS Windows
Thumbnail Length 3,140
Y Cb Cr Positioning Co-sited

Photoshop

Color Halftoning Info (72 bytes binary data)
Color Transfer Funcs (112 bytes binary data)
Copyright Flag False
Displayed Units X inches
Displayed Units Y inches
Global Altitude 30
Global Angle 30
Grid Guides Info (16 bytes binary data)
ID's Base Value (4 bytes binary data)
Layer State Info (2 bytes binary data)
Layers Group Info (6 bytes binary data)
Photoshop Format Standard
Photoshop Quality 12
Photoshop Thumbnail (3,140 bytes binary data)
Photoshop 0x0425 (16 bytes binary data)
Photoshop 0x0426 (14 bytes binary data)
Photoshop 0x0428 (12 bytes binary data)
Print Flags (9 bytes binary data)
Print Flags Info (10 bytes binary data)
Progressive Scans 3 Scans
Slices (841 bytes binary data)
URL List (4 bytes binary data)
Version Info Adobe Photoshop
Adobe Photoshop CS
X Resolution 72
Y Resolution 72

APP14

APP14 Flags 0 [14]
APP14 Flags 1 (none)
Color Transform YCbCr
DCT Encode Version 100

IPTC

Application Record Version 2

JFIF

JFIF Version 1.2
Resolution 72 pixels/inch

File — basic information derived from the file.

Bits Per Sample 8
Color Components 3
Encoding Process Baseline DCT, Huffman coding
Exif Byte Order Little-endian (Intel, II)
File Type JPEG
Image Size 1,600 × 1,200
MIME Type image/jpeg
Y Cb Cr Sub Sampling YCbCr4:4:4 (1 1)

Composite
This block of data is computed based upon other items. Some of it may be wildly incorrect if the image has been resized.

Thumbnail Image (3,140 bytes binary data)

ICC_Profile — this group of metadata is encoded in 3,144 bytes (3.1k)

Blue Matrix Column 0.14307 0.06061 0.7141
Blue Tone Reproduction Curve (2,060 bytes binary data)
CMM Flags Not Embedded, Independent
Color Space Data RGB
Connection Space Illuminant 0.9642 1 0.82491
Device Attributes Reflective, Glossy, Positive, Color
Device Manufacturer IEC
Device Mfg Desc IEC www.iec.ch...
Device Model sRGB
Device Model Desc IEC 61966-2.1 Default RGB colour space - sRGB
Green Matrix Column 0.38515 0.71687 0.09708
Green Tone Reproduction Curve (2,060 bytes binary data)
Luminance 76.03647 80 87.12462
Measurement Backing 0 0 0
Measurement Flare 0.999%
Measurement Geometry Unknown (0)
Measurement Illuminant D65
Measurement Observer CIE 1931
Media Black Point 0 0 0
Media White Point 0.95045 1 1.08905
Primary Platform Microsoft Corporation
Profile CMM Type Lino
Profile Class Display Device Profile
Profile Connection Space XYZ
Profile Copyright Copyright (c) 1998 Hewlett-Packard Company%00
Profile Creator HP
Profile Date Time 1998:02:09 06:49:00
10 years, 5 months, 19 days, 2 hours, 53 minutes, 43 seconds ago
Profile Description sRGB IEC61966-2.1
Profile File Signature acsp
Profile ID 0
Profile Version 2.1.0
Red Matrix Column 0.43607 0.22249 0.01392
Red Tone Reproduction Curve (2,060 bytes binary data)
Rendering Intent Perceptual
Technology Cathode Ray Tube Display
Viewing Cond Desc Reference Viewing Condition in IEC61966-2.1
Viewing Cond Illuminant 19.6445 20.3718 16.8089
Viewing Cond Illuminant Type D50
Viewing Cond Surround 3.92889 4.07439 3.36179







posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:50 AM
link   
reply to post by trog81
 


Ok I will bite. That looks very real to me. If that is a fake, you did a fine job. Nice clear picture.



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:51 AM
link   
This is the most believable UFO sighting I have seen in a very long time.
Why is everybody so quick to say they don't believe this is real?

This ufo appears to be very big.
Could you determine how big it was?

With it being a day time sighting its believable to me and very good photos.



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 11:56 AM
link   
reply to post by MagicaRose
 


It wasn't super huge, maybe the size of a couple busses. Still I am in awe. I think I am going crazy.



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 12:06 PM
link   
Photoshopped or Reflection (meaning attempted hoax)


And to the chick stating something like "this looks real. Why is everyone so quick to doubt its authenticity". You shouldn't be so eager to believe ! If you think this looks real you'll probably not get far in Ufology.


So IMHO and probably 99% of everyone who sees these, the first picture is most likely a reflection OR an outright attempt at fooling us. The second picture is laughable at best.


So I'm screaming HOAX at the top of my smoke filled lungs!!!



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 12:06 PM
link   
reply to post by trog81
 


May I ask, why Photoshop comes into the equation here?


Also, how do you get your photos from your phone to the computer?




posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 12:10 PM
link   
It looks so real it could be fake...

But man, it's shape, proportion to the camera, all looks real. That freaked me out when I first saw it. That is not a reflection that is for damn sure...



posted on Jul, 28 2008 @ 12:11 PM
link   
looks like a photoshop to me. the object doesn't have believable visual weight compared to the rest of the photo. Layer filters a plenty

still, better than the "alien walking across the surface of mars", so flag





new topics




 
28
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join