Here we have yet another branch on The Obama family tree.. Considering just how much about Barack Obama is unknown, it's amazing to see how so many
people rush to embrace him.
The article gives some additional information on Obama Sr., and adds yet another chapter to the mystery of Obama's past.
[edit on 28-7-2008 by LLoyd45]
Obama Brother Pushing Imports In China, page 1
privacy
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 28-7-2008 @ 09:43 AM by LLoyd45
Full Story
BARACK Obama’s half-brother has been helping to promote cheap Chinese exports in a low-profile business career while the Democratic senator has been winning worldwide fame in his race for the White House.
He has gone to extraordinary lengths to avoid public attention and his family links remain unknown to most of his acquaintances in Shenzhen, a border boomtown in southern China where he has lived since 2002.
Mark Ndesandjo is the son of Barack Obama’s late father and his third wife, an American woman named Ruth Nidesand who runs the up-market Maduri kindergarten in Nairobi.
Obama, however, refers to him simply as “my brother” and says he was the only uncontested heir after their father, a Kenyan, died in a car crash in 1982.
Full Story
reply posted on 28-7-2008 @ 10:30 AM by vfrickey
Never mind the brother... that's inconsequential. American presidents have always had odd relatives (remember Billy Carter?).
Why isn't the mainstream press harping on:
a) Obama's failure to accept Federal campaign financing - what's in Obama's campaign that won't stand the sort of scrutiny from the Federal Elections Commission accepting Federal campaign money would entail?
b) Obama's career as a lawyer for Tony Rezko, the convicted-on-Federal-corruption-charges slumlord of Chicago's south side?
c) Obama's campaign's acceptance of a 3.5 million-dollar money transfer from a British-Iraqi billionaire just weeks before an imprudent land deal that has returned to haunt the presidential contender, according to an investigation by The London Times?
The article is here:
www.timesonline.co.uk...
Quote:
"The money transfer raises the question of whether funds from Nadhmi Auchi, one of Britain’s wealthiest men, helped Mr Obama buy his mock Georgian mansion in Chicago.
A company related to Mr Auchi, who has a conviction for corruption in France, registered the loan to Mr Obama's bagman Antoin "Tony" Rezko on May 23 2005. Mr Auchi says the loan, through the Panamanian company Fintrade Services SA, was for $3.5 million.
Three weeks later, Mr Obama bought a house on the city's South Side while Mr Rezko's wife bought the garden plot next door from the same seller on the same day, June 15."
c) the massive influx of "advice" and financial support from ethanol refiners, big New York law firms, bigger investment banks (like Perseus LLC, which is one of George Soros' investment partners in a major pharmaceutical venture, Perseus Soros LLC - the head of the committee to select Obama's vice-presidential nominee is also a senior staffer from Perseus LLC?
There's plenty more which indicates Barack Obama is a money-grubbing crook who should never have graduated from the Illinois State Senate.
He's Dan Rostenkowski in a nicer suit and a thinner body, and MUCH better press.
HOW does the Democratic Party keep on finding losers like Obama? It's uncanny, when you think about it. One of the two largest political parties of the United States should be able to find ONE man or woman who is worthy of election to the Presidency, yet what do we keep getting? Obama. Kerry. Gore.
If, instead of putting Joe Lieberman in the vice-presidential role to Algore, the Democrats had let him run as President... a win in 2000 would have been hard to avoid. Lieberman had better credentials in every respect than either Shrub or Algore.
Are Democrats afraid of winning? Or are they simply so gullible that they'll fall for every slick ad campaign served up to them in an election year? A few minutes with Google would have turned up enough dirt on Obama to convince an open-minded voter that he's a bad 'un. So what's the Democrats' excuse (apart from the fact that they had a paucity of choices - gee, Hillary, Obama or "Senator Gone" Edwards, what a selection... ).
Why isn't the mainstream press harping on:
a) Obama's failure to accept Federal campaign financing - what's in Obama's campaign that won't stand the sort of scrutiny from the Federal Elections Commission accepting Federal campaign money would entail?
b) Obama's career as a lawyer for Tony Rezko, the convicted-on-Federal-corruption-charges slumlord of Chicago's south side?
c) Obama's campaign's acceptance of a 3.5 million-dollar money transfer from a British-Iraqi billionaire just weeks before an imprudent land deal that has returned to haunt the presidential contender, according to an investigation by The London Times?
The article is here:
www.timesonline.co.uk...
Quote:
"The money transfer raises the question of whether funds from Nadhmi Auchi, one of Britain’s wealthiest men, helped Mr Obama buy his mock Georgian mansion in Chicago.
A company related to Mr Auchi, who has a conviction for corruption in France, registered the loan to Mr Obama's bagman Antoin "Tony" Rezko on May 23 2005. Mr Auchi says the loan, through the Panamanian company Fintrade Services SA, was for $3.5 million.
Three weeks later, Mr Obama bought a house on the city's South Side while Mr Rezko's wife bought the garden plot next door from the same seller on the same day, June 15."
c) the massive influx of "advice" and financial support from ethanol refiners, big New York law firms, bigger investment banks (like Perseus LLC, which is one of George Soros' investment partners in a major pharmaceutical venture, Perseus Soros LLC - the head of the committee to select Obama's vice-presidential nominee is also a senior staffer from Perseus LLC?
There's plenty more which indicates Barack Obama is a money-grubbing crook who should never have graduated from the Illinois State Senate.
He's Dan Rostenkowski in a nicer suit and a thinner body, and MUCH better press.
HOW does the Democratic Party keep on finding losers like Obama? It's uncanny, when you think about it. One of the two largest political parties of the United States should be able to find ONE man or woman who is worthy of election to the Presidency, yet what do we keep getting? Obama. Kerry. Gore.
If, instead of putting Joe Lieberman in the vice-presidential role to Algore, the Democrats had let him run as President... a win in 2000 would have been hard to avoid. Lieberman had better credentials in every respect than either Shrub or Algore.
Are Democrats afraid of winning? Or are they simply so gullible that they'll fall for every slick ad campaign served up to them in an election year? A few minutes with Google would have turned up enough dirt on Obama to convince an open-minded voter that he's a bad 'un. So what's the Democrats' excuse (apart from the fact that they had a paucity of choices - gee, Hillary, Obama or "Senator Gone" Edwards, what a selection... ).
Pages: ^^TOP^^
3-4 years later, after being strongly anti-Obama....I will be voting for him for a second term.
Posted 14 days ago with 65 member flags
Posted 14 days ago with 65 member flags
Fox News Drops The Ball On Its Focus Group - Ron Paul Supporters!
Posted 12 days ago with 43 member flags
Posted 12 days ago with 43 member flags
Obama Supporters...Remember This List When You Vote This Year.
Posted 11 days ago with 35 member flags
Posted 11 days ago with 35 member flags
Ron Paul Rally Today in Colorado Springs! (full video and pictures!)
Posted 10 days ago with 33 member flags
Posted 10 days ago with 33 member flags
3-4 years later, after being strongly pro-Ron Paul... I will be voting for Ron Paul for a 2nd time
Posted 13 days ago with 28 member flags
Posted 13 days ago with 28 member flags
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.059 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.059 seconds
