EPA, AVIRIS system results from WTC flyover

page: 12
1
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 10 2008 @ 01:04 AM
link   
In response to requests from the EPA through the USGS, NASA flew AVIRIS on a De Havilland Twin Otter over lower Manhattan at mid-day on September 16 and 23, 2001. For these deployments, the Twin Otter was flown at altitudes of 6,500 and 12,500 feet.




posted on Aug, 10 2008 @ 01:20 AM
link   
This is the most ridiculous thread I have ever seen on ATS!!! 12 pages of the same thing over and over and over again.

Someone lock this junk!



posted on Aug, 10 2008 @ 02:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by bobafett
Someone lock this junk!


I have alreaday made that request since Gavron will not be adult enough to admit to the facts.



posted on Aug, 10 2008 @ 10:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1
In response to requests from the EPA through the USGS, NASA flew AVIRIS on a De Havilland Twin Otter over lower Manhattan at mid-day on September 16 and 23, 2001. For these deployments, the Twin Otter was flown at altitudes of 6,500 and 12,500 feet.


They did not request the AVIRIS to check for radiation:

Here is the USGS request for the NASA flyover, and what they requested:

trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov...

Here is Robert Greens and Roger Clarks from USGS report, on request to use AVIRIS and results:

popo.jpl.nasa.gov...

As you can see, the evidence is clear. No request for the AVIRIS to check for radiation.

The request to NASA from Roger Clark of the USGS was for the following:

- Hot spot location and temperature determination
- Asbestos mapping
- Debris composition and distrubution mapping.



posted on Aug, 10 2008 @ 11:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by gavron


A notice had been sent to the mods about your conduct.



posted on Aug, 10 2008 @ 11:45 AM
link   
reply to post by ULTIMA1
 


Great! I welcome the mods coming to this thread. They too will see the facts that I have presented, and how you continue to ignore them.

Until you admit there was no request for the AVIRIS to check for radiation at the WTC location, I will continue to post the truth, and links proving it.

Also, you sure are commenting alot on my posts. What happened to you ignoring me (twice)?


[edit on 10-8-2008 by gavron]



posted on Aug, 10 2008 @ 11:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
Great! I welcome the mods coming to this thread. They too will see the facts that I have presented, and how you continue to ignore them.


Well we will see who is correct.



posted on Aug, 12 2008 @ 02:21 PM
link   
Still waiting on the mods.





new topics

top topics



 
1
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join