the article says nothing about the circumstances in which muslims feel it is acceptable to fight/kill in the name of islam. This is why the article
is such deceptive rubbish. For example, the quran says:
60:8-60:9:
Allah (God) does not forbid that you do good and make justice for those who do not fight you in the religion or drive you out from your homes.
Indeed, Allah loves those who do justice. Allah only forbids your friendship with those who fight you in the religion and drive you out from your
homes and back those who drive you out. And who befriends them, such are wrongdoers.
In another place the quran states:
22:39:
Permission (to fight) is given to those who are being attacked, because they have been wronged. And surely Allah (God) measures out help for
them.
and to further clarify:
(2:190-193):
Fight in the path of Allah (God) those who fight you, but do not aggress. Surely Allah does not love the aggressors. And fight them where you come
upon them, and drive them out from where they have driven you out, for persecution is a worse thing than fighting. And do not fight them at the
Sacred Mosque (in Mecca) unless they fight you there, but if they fight you, then fight them back. That is the reward of the rejectors. Then if they
cease, so Allah is All-Forgiving, Gentle. And fight them until there is no more persecution and the religion is for Allah (God). But if they cease, so
let there be no hostility except against wrongdoers
From this we can see that there are there are limits, constraints and indeed a purpose for killing in the name of islam - for protection, to preserve
life and to end persecution.
Indeed the quran says
5:32
Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the
land - it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came
to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing
oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major sins) in the land!.[]
Further in the Quran we see, in no uncertain terms, the level with which killing is abhorred.
17:33
Thou shall not kill any person - for GOD has made life sacred - except in the course of justice. If one is killed unjustly, then we give his heir
authority to enforce justice. Thus, he shall not exceed the limits in avenging the murder; he will be helped.
This highlights the fact that people should not be killed unless, for example, bringing a murderer to justice or executing of criminals and that if
people are murdered or killed unjustly for any reason, their kin/heir has the right to demand justice.
It is quite obvious that muslims believe in the justice, the rule of law, the right of a person to defend themself if attacked, the right of the
occupied or persecuted to fight back against invaders or tyrants and the right of those who order society and protect against criminal forces to
punish criminals and miscreants. A muslim would be perfectly coinciding with their religion to believe that killing within the limits of the
afforementioned restrictions, as god has commanded them, would be acceptable.
Similarly you'd find jews who'd want to stone adulterers and execute people for various things etc on the basis of the torah and talmud, etc. Only
christians have no basis for ever killing anyone as their r eligion teaches them to forgive everyone, turn the other cheek, only cast the first stone
if they themselves are sinless etc. The concept of just war etc as pushed by the church is an invention of priests which has little basis in the
bible.


