I don't know but it sure would be cool.


I for one love a good story!

the bouldermd story is played out. even though the story was very entertaining
i hope that he is never to be heard from again. less B.S. and more information .

Keep an eye out for his book in the fiction isle of your local discount book store


Might even be in the free box at the back of the store, you know the one where books no one wants get put?

if you like a good thread read the d4rk knight thread,,,,this thread started when i first signed up and made an impact on me to this day,,, as you say about titor's thread,,,,even if untrue it kept you thinking,, excited and wondering what if!!!!

while i have read tons of good threads ort with good info,,, they fade off where as the d4rk knight thread pops up in my head instantly

"Barrack will win, but she will not concede."

Heck, I knew that and I'm neither "trained" nor "hot".
Osteogenesis imperfecta!!

Somehow I doubt anything will come out of it though it is interesting that it is "Boulder" and I have a feeling that they like to tell prank stories out of tradition to see if any catch onto a wider audience. I say that because I knew someone that worked in the University of Colorado planetarium (Fiske?) that gave this ridiculous MIB story that happened while he was on duty that supposedly took place some days or weeks after a UFO sighting (I don't even know if the sighting happened but it would have been mid-1990's). I never repeated it.

Edit: Fix error

[edit on 7/26/2008 by EnlightenUp]

Originally posted by Tapped In

I probably think he was spooked out by some of our more zealous members. I remember that one member was banned that night because he traced the OP's IP...

So you actually believed that happened.

I find it strange that the truth never wins and is so easily defeated by a few disbelievers.

So you actually believed that happened.

I find it strange that the truth never wins and is so easily defeated by a few disbelievers.

I don't believe or disbelieve. I am just curious to see how it could have played out if someone wasn't hell bent on proving how smart they are.

Everyone is a smarty pants... Or thinks they are...



Is it so wrong to just let someone be whatever they want, even if it doesn't fit your picture of what a person should be...

Originally posted by Tapped InI remember that one member was banned that night because he traced the OP's IP...

I never did figure out how that could even happen. I assume that the staff has access to our IP's to help them out in cases of sock puppets and banned members returning to cause trouble, but how did a regular member obtain his IP? I wouldn't think that would be possible short of hacking into ATS.

I just read through the original thread for the first time and it is quite intriguing.

I've never seen a thread so aggressively attacking the OP. For such an innocuous post that only asked if anyone else knew of anything similar. In less than 24 hours, the thread went 18 pages and ended with personally identifying information being posted and basically being declared a hoax. The whole point of the original post was barely addressed. Extraordinary.

Being an ER doc myself, I can say without a doubt that BoulderMD is who he says he is. I can identify with the post and could see myself being in his shoes. Because of that, to me, it is one of the more interesting posts I've seen on ATS. The rapidity and hostility of the attempted debunking that followed were remarkable. This leads me to believe that he was indeed on to something and someone decided he needed discredited. And discredited quickly, and to the extent that it wouldn't be brought up again. It would be interesting to look through the posting history of the "debunkers." On the other hand, it could just be a piece of creative writing by a physician. In that case, I'd buy the book. Evidently others would too by the amount of interest.

Secondly, the main attack on BoulderMD was that he wasn't a doctor. To me, this wasn't even a question because I know that world. It was obvious to me that the debunkers had no idea what they were talking about in that regard. But the majority believed them. Now, when I read other threads that get "debunked" that involve someone or something I have no experience with or knowledge of, it will make me wonder (eg, the GL worker thread). The debunkers there could be spewing believable nonsense too. Perhaps a means to an end.

So anyway, did any of the predictions come true?