It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Erasurehead
I really wanted to believe that this was finally something of substance out of Dr Edgar Mitchell. I defended him in threads about the topic of his Karrang radio interview. I thought this could be the begining of at least some of the truth coming out. Then I came across this transcript of a new interview with Edgar Mitchell. It seems to me he is almost completely backing off on his statements made during his Karrang interview. I am really not sure what his motives are but he is back to the same old Edgar being vague and nothing but a second hand information. I have to wonder if he has been told to back off.
Here is the transcript from blogtalkradio.com. Posted tonight new interview.
blog.blogtalkradio.com...
[edit on 24-7-2008 by Erasurehead]
Originally posted by TH3ON3
What would happen if say I threatened your wife or your family because I had total power given through presidential decree to do to you or yours anything I wanted and get away scot free. Would you back off just a bit? I think you might, unless you were totally insane. But I like your name, how many have you erased? And stop trying to erase the truth, the new interview was still brilliant and he DIDN'T back off the statement that Roswell WAS a cover-up and we retrieved a crashed UFO along with dead and live aliens.
Originally posted by Erasurehead
I do not want to erase the truth I want the real truth to come out. Don't you find it odd that in the Karrang interview he is making statements as if he had first hand knowledge and a week later in an interview he says he was misquoted and doesn't really know anything for sure. Sounds like he has been "asked" to rethink his statements.
[edit on 24-7-2008 by Erasurehead]
Originally posted by v1.01
i don't see where he backed off any statements he made. Lisa (the interviewer) in this new interview had misquoted him, so he corrected her. he never says in the original interview that he has first hand knowledge. he said that he worked with scientists he trusted, and who trusted him because he was an astronaut, who told him about the aliens. i don't believe he ever says nasa has anything to do with the aliens.. and we already know nasa is a smokescreen so it would not make sense if he did say nasa knows about the aliens... it's nasa's job to not know about the aliens
Originally posted by yeti101
you just jumped to the conclusion he had some "official" breifing by military/insiders that it was real.
In the kerang interview he never says he's seen a ufo or alien, he basically repeated what he said before- all the info about ufos is 2nd hand. But the words he chose in your mind added more gravitas to the meaning.
in the other thread i explained all this but alot of people here simply dont want to know the truth.
Oh and as for the secret government threatning him. Why didnt they do it over the last 15 years when he's said the same things?
This reminds me of the x-files writer being interviewed and even though he states none of the episodes are based on real cases and are more myths/legends they heavily fictionalised the ats member who asked the question just refused to believe his answer. Saying he's been "got at" etc.
[edit on 25-7-2008 by yeti101]
Originally posted by ufo reality
Don't make a mountain out of a mole hill.