SRSEN - Thanks so much for opening up the dicussion while not taking the thread off course. I think there could be some interesting ways to have the debate about skepticism and use info surrounding MEGA, Zelitsky, and even include Bimini, Andos, Carribean, land bridge from Cuba to Mexico etc. as the discoveries that have been increasingly coming of that area that point to all of that being one landmass above ground seemingly in the same era which is causing even mainstream science to review their postions on dating.
CORMAC (and his fellow Skeptics) - Welcome! Thanks for joining in! The primary objective of this thread is introducing the idea that A) a conspriacy
has silenced Zelitsky regarding MEGA and B) speculation on why and who did it. I don't think we can ever hope to 'agree' on that topic unless we
can agree that there is mounting evidence that strongly indicates there was a pre-historic civilization on now sunken landmass, landmass that seems to
have been displaced and submerged in a sudden violent motion.
So as OP I am officially opening up that idea for debate for both sides to use and hope that we can all be flexible while trying to be 'right'.
MERKA - Welcome! I am going to see if I can put together what evidence is available about the MEGA site -- along the same lines as the 2nd timeline
on page two -- that perhaps will be convincing enough so that as a group we can at least agree that it is anomolous and outside of the realm of what
science would consider naturally occuring.
HAANSLUNE - With all due respect, I linked to that site three times. Once on the first page, twice on the second. As to 'piling on', yep, sorry,
it means more than just "something other than expressing opinions and asking questions" when those opinions seem pre-formed out of the gate and also
to be inflexible regardless of what is presented.
And I think there is a tendency for 'questions' to be asked w/o A) properly reviewing data links (see: your not knowing I linked to three times to
that website) and B) with the goal of shutting down the dialogue (see: your first comment where you didn't even bother to ask a question and then
summed up with "Sounds like a lot of "UFO" style buzz, a lot of noise and nothing substantial").
Having said all of that, I sincerely appreciate your participation and am not trying to pick a fight with you. As a matter-of-fact YOU are the one I
would most like to bring over the 'other side' of this debate. To that end I am off to get a cup o' joe and then will be back with more research.