"We think that this is no longer a hypothesis, it is a fact, supported by scientists who specialize in geology and archaeology", says the investigator. "The existence of pyramidal structures deep underneath Cuban waters is verified. We only needed to gather the details ".

at best the introduction of several archeologists into the mix was a case of name-dropping (for the anticpated result of gaining some venture capital)...

"just two people", "apparently none", "maybe the crocodiles et it?", "no" and "no one outside some Atlantis enthusists. They can't even get tv channels desperate for ratings interested in them."

the Cuban Govt was promoting the expedition as a 'cover-story'
for all the surface ship activity in the area... as the Cubans, along with the sophisticated radar ship of an Ally was in the vicinity...

they (the whole party of interests) might be attempting to recover a "Broken Arrow" (which is code for a lost nuke missile, of which the harpoon class anti= ship launch platform was operating in those Cuban waters,,,, some time previously)

1) What would it take for you to turn your back on your beliefs and admit that there are more questions than answers as far as earth's history and man's origin goes, and that cover-ups in this regard do exist?

2) In your opinions, is it more or less likely that something majorly significant and history-changing has been found off the Cuban coast?

3) Why is it SO unbelievable that man lived on the earth and destroyed himself (or was destroyed) during periods in which 'textbook science' says nothing of the sort existed?

b. Prove there is a cover-up. Claims to that effect are irrelevant.

Without evidence to support the claims and the long delay in verifying them, it's just as likely that the findings were so dismally disappointing as to be professionally embarassing.

Because without evidence to back it up, it's pointless speculation.

Originally posted by TheWayISeeIt
reply to post by lostinspace

---

Iturralde says that at the rate that Cuba sinks now, 15mm a year, it would take 50k years to get there. But he also acknowledges that there is no volcanic activity in the area today, while they did recover volcanic sediment at the MEGA site. In fact MEGA sits, all 8 sq. miles of it, on Volcanic sediment.

If you think about sudden catastrophe and landmass being suddenly 'displaced', consider that directly after the '04 tsunami the Strait of Malacca went from 4000 feet deep to 100, so a sinking a city moves sort of moves into the realm of science.

Originally posted by TheWayISeeIt
reply to post by St Udio

---

at best the introduction of several archeologists into the mix was a case of name-dropping (for the anticpated result of gaining some venture capital)...

What are you talking about? Nowhere are archaeologists being named, dropped or otherwise, in this thread.

I pointed out Iturralde's credentials. I don't think that qualifies as 'gaining venture capital', whatever that means, but getting facts -- that were required to even let this thread live -- straight.

Bottomline: we have no specific information on this, speculation is our only recourse. Until a valid source for information is found we are left with speculation. Having seen these types of disoveries before I suspect the recovered info wasn't sufficient to obtain the millions needed ton continue - but that is speculation on my part.

Hans: better yet "the absence of evidence can best be explained by a conspiracy"

Hans: You suspect it - it sounds like a researcher may have been given large amounts of money to continue their research for the government- in secret. But your source may be just a rumor.