how comes theres never any proof!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 24-7-2008 @ 04:58 PM by menguard
reply to post by Makoto



The skeptics are those to scared to do digging for themselves and experience what is outside of themselves.

Skeptics base their conclusions on interpretations, not pure observations from experience.

A skeptic can base his decision more on a basis of ignorance or not knowing then knowing.

Because he was predisposed through conclusions before the fact.



[edit on 24-7-2008 by menguard]


reply posted on 24-7-2008 @ 07:37 PM by TopSecretArea
Just to repeat a good point for a starter...
Originally posted by azzllin
There is proof already, close up clear pictures, the problem is its never enough, if its clear its fake, if its wobbly its fake, if its night its fake, daytime its a balloon, Pictures get called fake with no proof of it being faked, why is that acceptable?........


It's a lot of proclaimed evidence out there, the problem is that the most of it is discarded as false no matter what.


Originally posted by AGENT_T
Trouble is.. A decent camera will need a large lens for taking night-shots.
Any lengthy exposure to try and compensate for lack of light will just produce blurry pics.

Sightings are rare..which means photos are even more rare as no-one wants to carry a weighty cam around everywhere 'just in case'.

As you say..cam-phone pics are a waste of time..until they develop lenses the whole width of the phone.


That is all so true. Raise your hand everyone of you that usually carries with you a camera everywhere you go, and especially thouse of you that is carrying the more expencive once with huge lenses for long distance photographing? Don't think it's to many of us. I know I usually don't think of carrying with me my regular digital camera that is of the usual kind you would find among people aren't hobby photographers or pro's for that matter. And thouse cameras doesn't give to good pictures at long distences since you'll have to zoom in a lot, and most often have to use the digital zoom to get close enough, and just because of that the picture get blurry. And if you don't do that the object is to far away and claimed to be a bird, a baloon, an airplane or whatever.

I guess most people won't consider it as good enough evidence before an aledged UFO craches in their back garden.

Guess my overall point is that most people don't carry with them cameras expecting to see an UFO at any given time. The most common "camera" people carries with them is the one on the mobilephones, witch frankly suckes for the most from the beginning if you ask me. They are getting better by the time thou, so we can hope that we'll get better evidence because of that But then again I suppose that most of that will be discarded as hoaxes anyway.


Also, all the people faking pics and videos out there help feeding the sceptisism towards this subject since they are destroying the credibility of thouse who are not lying, witch I think is sad.


Edit: Added some more.

[edit on 24-7-2008 by TopSecretArea]


reply posted on 24-7-2008 @ 09:04 PM by FIFIGI
reply to post by survivor



both links are linked to non-existant videos



reply posted on 24-7-2008 @ 09:16 PM by TopSecretArea
Originally posted by FIFIGI
reply to
post by survivor



both links are linked to non-existant videos


That problem seems to sadly be haunting a lot ot the threads here on ATS unfortunately.


reply posted on 24-7-2008 @ 10:22 PM by sigung86
reply to post by Lethil



East Enders is still on over there? Now that's evidence of something extraordinary.

Actually, so many people have so many opinions on what constitutes proof, that I suspect that even if the US Government came out and admitted the actuality of UFOs, oh... And aliens... There would be folks who think it is some kind of New World Order ruse to take over the world for the Masons...

The thing I think is funny is that folks are arguing belief vs non-belief. Belief, in and of itself means nothing. They either are or they are not real. Belief matters not. Evidence will be subjective, and probably won't convince everyone, as I stated above, even if it were iron clad.

After several hundred years of intervention by UFOs, if not thousands, there is still no directly attributable evidence that isn't disputable. Repeat there is still no directly attributable evidence that isn't disputable.

We will have lots of work ahead of us, in order to prove the validity vs the invalidity of UFOs and aliens, and I think the first thing we need to do is quit whacking on each other about belief vs non-belief. I, being a Christian, believe in Christ, Buddhist believe in an entirely different set of principles. One of us is wrong, either in a major way, or in minor differences. However, the truth will be the truth, no matter what I believe, or the Buddhist believes...

So quit trying to draw battle lines based on belief... It is by it's very definition, something that can not be proven or disproved. And it is awfully divisive in a field where everyone ought to be working together.


reply posted on 24-7-2008 @ 10:27 PM by Skipper1975
reply to post by skepticsnake



the proof is all over bro...soon you will see for yourself untill then..

take a gander at this stuff

conspiracyrealitytv.com...




video.google.com...


video.google.com...


search your soul...it's in your DNA


(^_*)

[edit on 24-7-2008 by Skipper1975]


reply posted on 25-7-2008 @ 12:48 AM by thewhiterabbit23
No there isn't proof meaning typed neatly into a school textbook, accepted by the world in general and taught to us since birth like up and down and 2=2+4. But proof is there in eyewitness accounts, grainy pictures and videos and the feeling most people have that we are not all there is in the is universe.

What do aliens want, that I don't know. Nor do I know where they come from or why. I believe some people do know but we have been taught this is wild and sci-fi. Not to be taken seriously. It's ingrained in us that alien believers are a little off. Its just like any other science that once was just a mystery. Until the proof that is doubted now is accepted by the majority of the population and scientific leaders it will always be open to criticism.

To top it off there is a lot of crap "proof" out there. Enough to make anything with a shred of truth easily dismissed. I never really believed in aliens until I was sixteen and saw something I couldn't wave away. Nothing mind-blowing just a bright but silent light rising out of the trees holding still for ten minutes and then zipping along at tree level until the end of the road before going up and disappearing.

Now I'm not believing everything I see and read but I believe more because I saw something I shouldn't have. Or at least something I haven't been able to explain yet.

Like any unbelievable idea, life after death, OBE and what not until you see it, it is hard to accept.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 17 hours ago, 122 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 67 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 17 hours ago, 44 replies
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 36 replies