Russia ‘Had Laser Cannons Before U.S.’, page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 09:01 PM by CTPAX
reply to post by rogue1



Google it... What is the point in playing "who’s what bigger"... Russians say they had Laser first... the end...
Russians sent satellite into space first... the end...
Russians sent first man into space first... the end...

"cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them" said Obama…

Just reading in this forum makes you wonder.... hmmm maybe his right!


reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 10:40 PM by rogue1
Originally posted by CTPAX
reply to
post by rogue1



Google it... What is the point in playing "who’s what bigger"... Russians say they had Laser first... the end...
Russians sent satellite into space first... the end...
Russians sent first man into space first... the end...

"cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them" said Obama…

Just reading in this forum makes you wonder.... hmmm maybe his right!


Erm and what else has the great Russian Republic contributed, oh yeah this was 50 years ago right ? Anything since ?


reply posted on 31-10-2008 @ 09:16 PM by CTPAX
reply to post by rogue1



Well as you might know... everything else is top secret....

HAARP system is one of these top secrets....


reply posted on 31-10-2008 @ 09:26 PM by Zaphod58
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
I have no reason to disbelieve the Russian's standpoint, after all the first working laser that could operate at room temperature was created by the Russians (read up about Zhores Alferov) but nevertheless that seems a bit hard to swallow.

10 years after the first working laser (1960) is made they had mounted them onto planes and had a suitable, portable powerplant that produced enough wattage so it could take down missiles?

You only need to take a look at the Boening YAL-1 to realise that's quite a feat, not only do you a require a huge airframe to mount this thing on (Boeing 747) you need immense power.



That thing is basically one huge chemical tank full of propellant with a massive diode on the nose.

Mmmm, bit of a stretch in 1972.
In fact I think the only airframe they could of mounted this on in the 70's was the "Bear" (Tupolev Tu-95) and that thing is 20 metres shorter than a 747 and has even less load capacity (about 170,000kg compared to 190,000kg).

So again, maybe they should release a few photographs or something because that really would have been a stunning achievement.

Note also this comes from a Russian paper. We all know how the Russians love to toot their own horn.

[edit on 24/7/08 by The Godfather of Conspira]


The USAF was flying around an NKC-135A in about 1984 that had a laser mounted on top. It was rather successful. It shot down several AIM-9s that were shot at it, as well as shooting (at very low power) another NKC-135A that had targets on the side of it. The difference is that the YAL-1 is designed to stop IRBMs/SRBMs where the ALL was designed for smaller targets. That's why the ABL is mounted on a 747-400. To shoot down an IRBM/SRBM you need a lot more power to get the range to hit them.


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 04:43 AM by Iblis
current.com...

Levity.

:]

I'm at four lines, technically.


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 12:34 PM by 1000hanz
Originally posted by mad scientist
Originally posted by RussiaUSA

they were never behind in electronics.. and also never behind in aircraft or nuclear. Thats called western bias my dear friend...they post things on the web with no proof coming up with unfactual evidence that relates irrelevent things to the soviet union. the west had the largest propaganda machine in the world...many articles regarding the soviet union were nagative and bias false information. even when the russians put up their first satelite the american press reduced its significance by saying its not better still lol.


Russia was always and still is behind in electronics, in fact they had to buy their supercomputers from America in the 90's. The only time Russia ever nosed ahead in aircraft design was with the Mig-15 which not surprisingly used a British Rolls Royce jet engine Apart from that Russian designs have always come out later to counter western designs.
The western military propoganda machine normally inflated the USSR's military power to inflate their own military budgets. So if the west said the USSR was ahead in anything in most cases it was t increase their budgets but in reality the USSr was behind. Simple fact. Let's face it, it took the Soviets 4 years after the trinity test to build their first weapon and that was with spies spoon feeding them all the designs from the Manhattan project.
You are right about "SOME" computer systems that Russia had was behind from USA, but not ALL, go read what western sources say on these 2 threads start from page 3 on this thread and read the posts posted by "Steller X" :
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Start on page 3 also on this thread, and read the posts by "Stellar X" www.abovetopsecret.com...
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israeli Company Has FAA Permission to Fly Drones in U.S. Airspace
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Colt Commander, finally failed
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Laser Firearms
  Posted 16 days ago with 4 member flags
US Army Launches Phase II of competition to replace M4
  Posted 17 days ago with 3 member flags
America\'s Next Bomber: Unmanned, Unlimited Range, Aimed At China
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags