This topic is in the Above Politics discussion forum.  (rss)


Does Rainwater Belong to the Government?


<<  1    2  >>



reply posted on 25-7-2008 @ 03:50 PM by jmdewey60


If the government owns the rainwater, or all water, they can sell the management of it to a private company.
They have already done this in some countries.
They force everyone to buy their water from the company and make it illegal to use any method of collecting water on your own.
Cops will bust you for tilting your head up and opening your mouth, while it is raining.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-7-2008 @ 03:59 PM by justamomma



Originally posted by Being_From_Earth
If they could, they would bring in Oxygen permits tomorrow.
The state thinks it owns all things including you.
Evil psychopathic dictators is what they are.


well, what do you think the plans for having us chipped is all for?

soon we WILL be told that in order to use any resource on this earth, we will need to have a chip in our bodies (which, btw, i still don't think the chip is THE mark of the beast, but certainly a violation of our rights as humans when considering we either comply w/ what goes into our bodies or we will be "punished").

quite frankly I am shocked and maintain my right to stay in a state of shock at all that is going on........ actually a state of shock at all that is BEING ALLOWED TO go on! I am both shocked and highly L-I-V-I-D!!!!

[edit on 25-7-2008 by justamomma]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-7-2008 @ 05:36 PM by no name needed


Better yet, if a "seeded" rainstorm crosses state lines and the state where it is now raining refuses to buy the rainstorm from the previous state, then they would have transportation of stolen goods across state lines...would that then become a federal crime...if so, then which would take precedent; the Clean Water Act (governed by the USACOE) or crime that became federal due to the crossing a state line issue. Whose jurisdiction would this fall under?

Bottom line is this: this is an UNENFORCEABLE law.

Analogy: In Texas, land owners are allowed to secure the perimeter of their land with game proof fencing, thus locking in all wildlife that resides on their property. This wildlife is owned by the state, but the state does nothing to fine the owner or to reclaim the "states" wildlife. I figure the same will be true of any "rain water law".



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-7-2008 @ 07:09 PM by ReelView


Sorry, the government doesn't belong to the government. They always try to get people to buy in to rationals. At work there's lot of "Earth Friendly" being promoted. It's for a reason beyond the obvious. Just as the big overstep by the US "Federal Government" the "National Parks". Preserve the good spots for everybody got peoples buy in and lead them to accept more and more "Fed" intrusion and "Fed" authority even though it's entirely illegal and unconstitutional via the 10th amendment.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-7-2008 @ 10:34 PM by Cyberbian


Yes the wind and the rain, and lightening belong to the government. And they must be held accountable for the wanton destruction caused by allowing their beasts to roam free. With ownership comes responsiblity.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:


























ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.076 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread