Please tell me these predictions are not happenning
 "Earthquake magnitude of 6.8, struck shortly after midnight at a depth of about 65 miles near the coast of Iwate, 280 miles northeast of
Tokyo."
(visit the link for the full news article)
|
readingshouts.wordpress.com...
(visit the link for the full news article)
|
ok, they're not happening.
The quake last night was medium-big, and I most certainly would not be writing this if there had been a 30 metre tsunami.
Please remember that roughly 20% of the earthquakes in the world happen here. It's like predicting a tornado in the USA in August.
|
Suppose we just have to wait to see if theres a tsunami i guess
|
 Originally posted by WERE_ALL_GONA_DIE
Suppose we just have to wait to see if theres a tsunami i guess 
the quake was 15 hours ago.
if it hasn't happened yet, it's probably not going to.
|
reply to post by vox2442
Oh my bad, thought it was only recent
Suppose its only half true, whitch also means its half wrong ,so i dunno 
|
1. This is in no way, shape, or form a "breaking news" linkage.
2. The San Fransisco quake idea is laughable. First of all, the San ANdreas fault is a slip-strike fault, not a subduction fault. Large tsunamis
don't form around slip-strikes. Look up the 1906 7.8 M quake in the Bay area and notice the maximum wave was 10 cm. Secondly, a 150 meter wave
would be almost 5 times the largest recorded tsunami, which was the indonesian one a few years ago. The only way that fault could produce that wave
would be if everything west of the fault sloughed off into the ocean... which I would think would be a little more interesting for people to know that
the state of the following wave.
|
Tsunami's portrayed in films are unrealistic.
Its not a huge wave coming towards you its more like the sea rushes in it keeps coming for a long period of time its not actually high above the
sea.
150 meter high wave would dissipate and break quicker than the Indonesian tsunami.
[edit on 24/7/08 by Being_From_Earth]
|
