It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...even when he is ruling from Jerusalem as the promised Messiah.
John of course, Jesus told his disciples to record what they saw and heard. I don't see how that is relevant. If John McCain delivers a speech and CNN reports what he said we assume that is what McCain said even though we didn't hear him utter the words himself. The gospels are a testimony of what the disciples saw and heard. It's their testimony.
Originally posted by Quazga
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
"Jesus never claimed to be God"??????
You guys don't know your scripture too well....
John 8:24 - "I said therefore to you, that you shall die in your sins; for unless you believe that I am He, you shall die in your sins."
John 8:58 - "Jesus said to them, 'Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am.'"
John 10:30 - "I and the Father are one."
As is true for us all. Who wrote John by the way?
Did you read anything in my post above other than that?
And what about the secular accounts of Jesus Christ?
Originally posted by AgnosticX
Jesus Christ never existed. All religion is just based off of pagan sun worship. Thats why so many religions are so similar. Because there all based on the same thing. Worship of the sun. Anyone who hasn't, I reccomend them to watch the movie Zeitgeist, They explain about religion in the first part of the movie.
That is not what Revelation says. Jesus himself says there will be a 1,000 year reign on Earth, from Jerusalem. Where Satan is bound in chains and is to spend that 1,000 years in the Abyss, only to be loosed for one last feeble attempt to wage war against God.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by WarBow
...even when he is ruling from Jerusalem as the promised Messiah.
Did it ever occur to you that this is the foretold Anti-Christ?
The promised Messiah already came to Jerusalem, 2000 years ago.
This is the NWO/Neo-Con religion, that you seem to be espousing.
Why do you think I spend all this time writing to contradict this philosophy?
The real Messiah came and glorified God.
The false messiah will come and claim to be God, for his own glory.
Oh, you like definitions?
Originally posted by AgnosticX
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Despite his popularity and unquestioned existence, there is not the slightest bit of physical evidence to support a historical Jesus - no artifacts, dwelling, works of carpentry, or self-written manuscripts. All claims about Jesus derive from writings of other people. There occurs no contemporary Roman record that shows Pontius Pilate executing a man named Jesus.
In addition, there is not a single contemporary (ie secular) piece of documentation that mentions Jesus. All documents regarding Jesus were written well after (AFTER) the alleged life of Jesus by either: unknown authors, people who had never met an earthly Jesus, or from fraudulent, mythical or allegorical writings.
All reliable evidence for the historical actuality of Jesus Christ are purely hearsay.
hear·say
noun 1.unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one's direct knowledge
That is not what Revelation says. Jesus himself says there will be a 1,000 year reign on Earth, from Jerusalem. Where Satan is bound in chains and is to spend that 1,000 years in the Abyss, only to be loosed for one last feeble attempt to wage war against God.
Originally posted by Zaimless
d) The Dead Sea Scrolls contain even more facts that are not being revealed to the public and are being kept hidden from us. Meaning there is more to this story than we know.
Originally posted by OldThinkerTRUTH IS VERY PREJUDICE, 2 AND 2 IS ALWAYS 4.
That's not sound logic though.
Originally posted by AgnosticX
reply to post by NOTurTypical
There was a reason i had put the word after in all caps. All these so called acounts of christ are all after he "died". There are no accounts of christ during his actual "life". Everything about christ in your list were all people who spke of him after his "death", after christianity had already started. You don't have to be mad, but the guy just didn't exist, sorry.
No serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non-historicity of Jesus. ~~ Otto Betz
All except for this, when Jesus sets up his millennial kingdom on Earth the antichrist will have already been revealed 7 years prior. And he will come to destroy that already revealed antichrist. You are correct though, the FIRST time those events pan out is a counterfeit. The second time it happens it is the real Christ.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
That is not what Revelation says. Jesus himself says there will be a 1,000 year reign on Earth, from Jerusalem. Where Satan is bound in chains and is to spend that 1,000 years in the Abyss, only to be loosed for one last feeble attempt to wage war against God.
Seriously?
Is that what you think?
Let me make up a little scenario and tell me if I get it wrong.
God locks Satan, the deceiver, and therefore human kind can be free to act good and overcome their hatred for God.
A man comes forward and produces plans for righting the problems of the world.
He goes to Jerusalem and takes up a throne on the Temple Mount.
The world sees how great things are, by following the advice given.
They recognize the man's greatness and proclaim him king.
The man says, "Great, and thanks, but I am really God, and you should worship me."
This is the story of the Anti-Christ.
Someone has deluded you in to believing in something that is the opposite of what the Bible teaches.
Originally posted by AgnosticX...there is not the slightest bit of physical evidence to support a historical Jesus -
Originally posted by Komodo
and no I didn't read the entire post.. the title alone was enough..