Im just trying to understand your reasoning. I will try to read your other threads later to get a better understanding. But so far I can only conclude that you are saying it is cursed from events that have unfolded afterwards. why have actors from other films such as the Passion of Christ not been 'cursed'? Surely this would send a stronger symbolic message if not more a relevant one?
"This curse is just a symbol about how upset is God to the way in which many people in America is thinking, is a visible demonstration that he is disgusted with the idols that Hollywood is trying to rise to the sky, and he is going to show that he is the only truly Star in this story."
And if it is Gods wrath then Christian Bales arrest (for throwing his mother and sister out of his hotel room), is a bit weak considering the power of God.
I agree that we are all a bit too hedonistic at times and that we might need bringing down a peg or two but the connection between that and The Dark Knight seems weak at best. (Go back to other more 'God' offensive films eg Da Vinci and Potter). Surely to make a point (or curse) you would make it with a more relevant source, not to a comic book character that will mostly be watched by kids who will not understand the meaning of both the subtext or the curse.
If the curse was a personal one made by someone with a grudge I could more easily understand that, but a message from God seems a bit too vague/much. You state that it is because of the negative vibe, but the film ends with a positive note, evil is defeated and that while some people are corruptible others are not. So how does that fit with your theory. How is it relevant to WWIII?
I do not doubt that there are lessons to be learned and messages that are 'sent'. I just feel that, although many coincidence's have occurred, this can hardly be a message of some kind.
Its obvious to many people who are not psychics that we are possibly on the verge of another war, and that 3 main religions and civilizations as you say, have always been fighting, not just now.
I see your point about how things are coming to a head, but to relate it to a film seems like clutching at straws or maybe even analysis paralysis.
I think you are drawing in and trying to relate too many topics to one particular thing.
I will read your other threads when I can. I am interested in your theories and do believe something maybe on the way but I cant distinguish how you link them. Especially to this film.
Much Peace
Lestat
edit poor spelling!
[edit on 6/8/2008 by LestatG]


) 