CNN: Video of UFO craft destroying missile nuke flying through the sky!, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 177 times


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 07:57 PM by Pocky
reply to post by N.B.A.Y.S.O.H



What other celebrities do you know of that are ATS members? I'm assuming Charlie Sheen could be one of them. Larry King would be safe to not say, if he is, but I doubt it. Maybe he has been listening to Coast2coastam and that is why he is making these shows. Such topics may have sparked his interest. Because of his continuous airing of UFO topics, I'm starting to believe his ratings are going up. I really hope he is safe.

Stewart Swerdlow says Tim Russert is dead because things he did were not in accordance with what the Elite wanted. As well as some other media figure that just died recently. I don't know all about these guys lives, but I would say Larry King needs to watch out. Especially with this particular show. I hope you guys have noticed how vibrant he is for his age. I am looking out for this man, if something odd happens to him, I'm gonna point the finger, just because of the topics he's been bringing up lately. I hope he has a good fortress around him, because this is dangerous territory.



reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 08:19 PM by Jinni
Originally posted by Pocky
I saw this on CNN's Larry King 3 nights ago. I am very pleased to see that somebody posted it on Youtube. I saw this On the CNN website yesterday, but I heard people comment being appalled that www.cnn.com would have UFO stories of this nature on their front page.

So here it is guys. Give this sucker plenty of hits. I have never seen a video where a UFO is actively destroying an atomic weapon. And guess what, according to these experts, they haven't only been destroying US artillery, they've been doing it with other countries. Are they trying to save us?


djYSiwIZ69I&feature=related



[edit on 22-7-2008 by Pocky]



It's total rubbish.

The SOFTWARE in the missiles experienced COMMON CAUSE SYSTEMATIC FAILURE. Why all missiles? Because they all probably had the same software and the conditions that triggered the systematic fault was the same for all failed missiles.

It's absolutely pathetic how the government is blaming UFOs for wasting tax payers money on crap defence software.

The guy in the video said it couldn't happen - he is obviously ignorant or lying.

If they said it was because they developed the systems wrong there would be an uproar but if they say it was a UFo the public say oh, 'ok', cool.




[edit on 22-7-2008 by Jinni]


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 08:21 PM by sllapur
reply to post by WhatTheory



Why would something have to blow-up? Doesn't that defeat the idea of deactivating the bomb? If anything, the fact that the bomb would explode would mean a lot of danger for the craft, which is still valuable even if it carries no entities inside of it.


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 08:26 PM by sllapur
reply to post by Jinni





"The guy in the video said it couldn't happen - he is obviously ignorant or lying."


How is he obviously ignorant or obviously lying? Do you have proof?

Do you really believe the theory you have presented about what testimony would be more pleasing has not been speculated many times in the past? How about this, if the military, instead of lying and portraying UFOs as possibly hostile, had decided to say, "Hey, it was a software failure, but we have the brains that can solve that and in the process improve the software and hardware... So, be careful Russia!". Wouldn't that produce an even more positive reaction from people, as they would say, "Hell yeah, that's our government... we have the brightest people in the world!!!"


Don't call people liars and ignorant just because you are uncomfortable with the availability of evidence, blame the U.S. Government's inability to make themselves trust-worthy after all the cover-ups that have been revealed and I don't mean UFO related only.


Peace and Love



reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 08:29 PM by sllapur
reply to post by Promecus



"They stated that this is happening in several countries. UFOs are shutting down warheads. "


They didn't say warheads are being deactivated in every country, they said that every military power is having situations with UFOs, in many cases deactivation of equipment and such things.


Peace and Love


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 08:32 PM by Jinni
Originally posted by sllapur
reply to
post by Jinni





"The guy in the video said it couldn't happen - he is obviously ignorant or lying."


How is he obviously ignorant or obviously lying? Do you have proof?

Do you really believe the theory you have presented about what testimony would be more pleasing has not been speculated many times in the past? How about this, if the military, instead of lying and portraying UFOs as possibly hostile, had decided to say, "Hey, it was a software failure, but we have the brains that can solve that and in the process improve the software and hardware... So, be careful Russia!". Wouldn't that produce an even more positive reaction from people, as they would say, "Hell yeah, that's our government... we have the brightest people in the world!!!"


Don't call people liars and ignorant just because you are uncomfortable with the availability of evidence, blame the U.S. Government's inability to make themselves trust-worthy after all the cover-ups that have been revealed and I don't mean UFO related only.


Peace and Love


No it wouldn't. You have a lot to learn in terms of politics and money.

To let the world know they they screwed up the software would imply too many unprofessional realities that would put it under the spot light.

I certainly do believe in UFOs, I've seen them myself so I don't need to see someone else's evidence for it. But I believe people are abusing this phenomenon for their own purposes.

Oh, and UFOs aren't alien they are home grown. If you understand that everything falls into place.

[edit on 22-7-2008 by Jinni]

[edit on 22-7-2008 by Jinni]


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 08:38 PM by red 5
reply to post by sllapur



i will say liar because that is what i think, none of them have the evidence it takes here on ATS to prove that flatulence exists. and itis not evidence it is testimony.


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 08:41 PM by Pocky
reply to post by luxor311


Hold up, Transfomers 2 and Watchmen are coming out next year. You really think UFOs are gonna be dieing down soon? My gut feeling is NO. If anything it hasn't reached its peak. These new movies and show topics are just gonna make people look up at the sky more. Sure more people will own a digital camera or cell cam next year. These factors are only increasing the amount of evidence that people will have to back their claims.



reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 08:46 PM by Jinni
Originally posted by Pocky
reply to
post by luxor311


Hold up, Transfomers 2 and Watchmen are coming out next year. You really think UFOs are gonna be dieing down soon? My gut feeling is NO. If anything it hasn't reached its peak. These new movies and show topics are just gonna make people look up at the sky more. Sure more people will own a digital camera or cell cam next year. These factors are only increasing the amount of evidence that people will have to back their claims.


You can take millions of UFO pictures all day long. The truth will never be disclosed until one of the these UFOs are caught (by the public), shown and analysed (by the public).

Forget disclosure it ain't happening. If you want the truth then the civilians have to get it themselves.

No, photos won't do, we need the real deal for a disclosure.


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 09:00 PM by Veritas Aequitas
Originally posted by tiger_tts
Agreed - also this is much more credible than an "eye witness" sighting. These guys were serious military personnel with special clearances gained through their record of reliability. This was their job, there were interviews, debriefings, reports etc. for some and for others the order that "this never happened" (and psych reviews I'd bet were done at some point for a lot of the guys). This is why I think the Disclosure Project is so compelling - a bunch of sober, reliable people with long track records, discuss what they did and saw on their jobs and sometimes their entire career. Not simply a one shot unexpected wow experience.


Yes, and in fact if these men had to appear in court for any other reason their testimonies would be greatly appreciated and respected.

Back to that video. Bill Nye is a Scientist. So he should have disproved all of these men scientifically which he could not and did not do. Anyone can merely say the "you weren't there so you can't prove what you saw" crap.
He thought it was just mere chance that these nukes went out the same time as UFOs were spotted around the base. But he could not back this up with science and reason that all 10 went out which is impossible on their own. I highly doubt they have all the nukes on the same power grid for starters. And as the guy on there said, they have back up generators and such.

He also pulled out that lame 'freedom of information act' sheet where he tried to explain how they simply black out the names of people's addresses and telephone numbers. I mean why the hell would he even say and do a stupid thing like that when time after time after time, we have seen these papers with the entire page blacked out except for a sentence here and there. It seems he was just on there to cause friction so I believe that's why Larry King has him on there unfortunately. He's not a good debater when it comes to UFOs.

About his example and the camera on every street corner. Sure that example would work if we had a camera on every street corner staring at the sky. The truth is, it isn't the same comparing it to many people owning video cameras. I mean, how many people carry around a cam corder. And I'm talking about a really good one that is able to take sharp footage. Not many I'm sure. We all have crappy cell phone video cameras at our reach most of the time so is why any object looks terribly out of focus. It's not like the UFOs are everywhere and when they do show up,

A) They have to be low enough to get a good view.
B) Be near your home where you may keep your video cam.
C) Remain long enough for you to get your cam corder.

All of these things put together are still pretty rare. And when excellent footage does show up, people doubt it because it's too good. Or it's inconclusive as to what it is even if it's clear as a heck so it still remains a UFO. Saying it's intelligent life from another planet would be impossible to admit for any skeptic. Even me to be honest if I were looking at one clear video that can't be proven a hoax. But when you put every story, picture, testimony from good reliable sources, it is not so hard for me to say it after all.

[edit on 22-7-2008 by Veritas Aequitas]


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 09:15 PM by red 5
reply to post by Veritas Aequitas



Any person who has any knowledge knows that you can not prove that something does not exist. Its like trying to prove that god does not exist. Secondly most of the “testimony” is not even admissible in a court as hearsay, the rest is just speculation.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 1 days ago with 27 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 184 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 99 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 6 hours ago, 66 replies