John Lear Embarrassed On Coast 2 Coast AM

Originally posted by Mad_Hatter
For one, I'm sick of people defending Lear because he is a "nice guy."

You will not see me defend John Lear because he is a "nice guy" (which he may be), in fact I don't believe in one of his ideas, and he never gave me a straight answer to my questions about his theories or his ideas about subjects posted in ATS, but I will defend his right to say what he wants.

The fact that he has a somewhat large following speaks more for the personality of those that follow him than for his own personality, but even his followers have the same right of believing him as you have the right to think he is nuts.

But when you talk about someone who speaks without providing proof of what he says and you yourself do not provide proof that he is nuts or that he does all this on purpose, knowing that he is lying, you fall in the same category of someone who just speaks about something just because he can.

Attacking other people's knowledge of English while not spelling "asinine" correctly also shows that you can easily fall prey of that easy escape route of attacking other people instead of attacking their points of view.

PS: I may not know how to spell in English (I learnt it all by myself) but that does not take my rights away or makes my posts wrong, it's my idea behind what I write that may be wrong.

[SNIP]

Mod edit:
Removed Entire off-topic post.

[edit on 22-7-2008 by Gemwolf]

Originally posted by SantaClaus

Originally posted by internos
Well, mine is undeservedly as well.

You speculate, man, you never try to promote your findings or your opinions on them as fact.

You've really gotta listen to an interview or two. Lear has been asked "Do you know this for a fact?" and he always says "Of course I don't know" Every single time.

John Lear is a genuinely sweet and intelligent man, however he will believe anything you tell him.