It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Come in… come in… come in… Listen! Come in! Talk to me! I am hot! I am hot! Come in! What? Forty-five? What? Fifty? Yes. Yes, yes, breathing. Oxygen, oxygen… I am hot. This… isn’t this dangerous?”
His body, perfectly preserved, is frozen at –270 degrees C
Originally posted by GrooveCat
reply to post by ngchunter
-270 C is the temperature of space, it would make sense he was frozen at that temperature. -273 C would be absolute zero.
Originally posted by GrooveCat
reply to post by ngchunter
It's not that space itself has that temperature but just the general amount of energy and radiation in free space is enough to raise anything in it to at least -270 C.
Of course that's only a general temperature, it changes closer to stars and depending on the material, the ISS is metallic so is very susceptible to heat exchange and the moon is huge so absorbs a lot of solar radiation heating it up, whilst the dark side does not.
The point being it's not unlikely that an object at the edge of the solar system only the size of a human body would be at a very low temperature. All that's keeping it from absolute zero would be radiation from the sun and the universe in general.
Originally posted by GrooveCat
Well there is a medium in space, or else space would have no temperature and it would become an energy vacuum.
This is essentially the Big Freeze hypothesis, the medium becomes too spread out
due to the universe expanding and there isn't enough heat energy from stars to stop the universe reaching absolute zero. This medium is basically just gases and dust, though the density is extremely low, almost negligible.
I don't think it's all that unlikely that the events purported by the article could happen, if you think about the tension at the time of course the Soviets would want to hide their mistakes.
Likewise, some transmissions may have been exaggerated or fabricated all together, but there is still easily enough evidence to suggest something was going on.
Think about it: wouldn't it be even more shocking if the Soviets WEREN'T trying to dominate space?
Originally posted by full997
An unscheduled firing of rocket engines could of sent a craft off course and on an exrta solar trajectory.
Originally posted by full997
I never claimed to have any knowledge of rocketry, i was simply suggesting possible things.
Though as far as the most powerfull rocket we know that they have not being able to make it, then what about as i also sugested some experimental rocket that we the public have no knowledge of.
And saying that about they not having a known rocket that could reach an extra solar orbit, what about an experimental or prototype version of the rocket used to go to the moon intentionally sent on an extra solar or a lunar trajectory in order to test teh true viability of said engine to make it to the moon.
As i said i have never claimed to have any specific knowledge of rocketry and i was just making sugesstions.
However if you shoot down any who makes a sugesstion then i suppose all future threads may contain only your theorys as no one elses laymans opinions seem to be met with a good nature.
Originally posted by full997
One thing i your last post has made me think is that the prototypes that exploded on the lauch pad may have been intentionally destroyed to hide something or for some other reason.
I wouldn't be suprised if American sabotage was involved or sabotage by an opponant of the Soviet government of the time.
If the Soviets didn't have it to put a rocket in an extra solar orbit, then perhaps what i said in my previous posts but changed to refernce the Americans rather than the Soviets?