Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

The Ancient Persians were modern Caucasian! Plus more on "Kemet"..

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 4 2008 @ 04:01 PM
link   
I saw something on the human genome on TV that stated that the Kalahari Bushmen have the oldest genetic pattern in all of humanity and that they are racially homogeneous,in that they are neither black nor white nor are they negroid, Caucasoid, or mongoloid,and that they are more than likely to be the root race of all humanity,also that their language contains all the root elements of every language but is not like any other. Also there is some evidence that the Australian Aborigines have been there for something like 160,000 years ,also the Papua New Guineans,trace back at least 60,000 years and both those groups are defined as caucusiod .




posted on Nov, 13 2008 @ 10:05 PM
link   
reply to post by runetang
 


can you prove the existance of white people before the caucus mountains.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 08:26 PM
link   
reply to post by runetang
 


Recent DNA research has shed new light on the origin of the modern Humans (Homo Sapiens Sapiens), and when they first left Africa.
It has revealed that modern Humans were in Africa at least 200,000 years ago and that they first migrated out of Africa somewhere between this period and 100,000 years ago.
The Aboriginals had certainly reached Australia, the furthest part of the globe from Africa, by at least 40,000 years ago, which was probably the end of this first mass migration that saw man spread across the globe.
DNA research has also thrown up new theories as to the origin of the white Caucasian race.
We all know that we all orginated in Africa but what is lesser known is that about 1 in 35 of the entire black Negroid race carry the "white gene", but it only results in Albinism, if at all, if both Negroid parents carry the gene.
These albino Negroids may well have been victims of violent race predudice by the majority black population, so their parents would have moved away and segregated themselves off from everyone else.
Its possible that many other parents and Albinoid children of Albino Negroids joined them until there was a reasonably large tribe in Africa consisting of both white and black Negroids, but mostly of Albinoids.
Eventually, for some unknown reason, they decided to travel North out of Africa and into freezing cold ice-age afflicted Western Europe.
Natural selection would now have favoured the lighter skinned Albino Negroids, who were better equipped to handle the cold climate than their darker skinned relatives and over time all the black Negroids in the group would have died off.
Again over time, natural selection would have also favoured those with larger noses, thinner lips and longer head hair, all adaptations to extreme cold weather, thus becoming more and more like modern white Caucasians in their appearance.
It is also known that Homo Sapiens lived alongside Neanderthal man for many thousands of years and that they inter-bred together. This would have greatly accelerated the change to a modern white Caucasian appearance as Neanderthals already had very large noses, thin lips and long head hair!
By the by, Neanderthals were not the dumb knuckle dragging ape-men that some people think they were...Neanderthal children had the same size brain as Homo Sapien Sapien children, but adult Neanderthals actually had a larger brain than Homo Sapien Sapien adults! Not only that but they could talk, make clothes, and use tools too. Inter-breeding with them would have produced even smarter, stronger offspring, a good survial strategy in a very harsh climatic period.
It is clear that the old theory stating that the invading hordes of violent and bloodthirsty Homo Sapiens Sapiens arriving from Africa gradually killed off all the Neanderthals in Europe until they finally went extinct, was not entirely true.
Sure, there almost certainly would have been some violent clashes between them but the DNA record states that eventually they put their differences aside and inter-bred. So the Neanderthals never really went extinct...They simply became us!
Anyway back to Human migration. There is certainly a long enough period of time to allow Albinoid Negroids to evolve into white Caucasions and with the help of some Neanderthal DNA it seems entirely possible.
However I then discovered something that muddies the waters...Cro-Magnon man.
We are told that lived in the Upper Paleoithic period (50,000 to 10,000 years ago), around the same time that the albinoid Negroids would have been in Europe. We are also told that carefull analysis of Cro-Magnon mans skull features reveals them to be far more similar to white Caucasion in origin than black or albinoid Negroid....So when did Cro-Magon man actually get to Europe? Were they an early, slightly less evolved version of Homo Sapiens Sapiens, but a more evolved version of albinoid Negroid? Were they the species that interbred with Neanderthal man to become modern Homo Sapiens Sapiens?...It throws up many such questions that will require much more research to answer satisfactorally.
Regards
Alf.



posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 12:06 PM
link   
A Persian fellow I once knew told me that his mother must have been European, because her hair was blond. I told him that she simply harked back to the genetic past, when Persians were blond and blue-eyed. He was Persian, you see, not Iranian, not like those (as he put it) G__ D_____ Arab descendants who ruined his country. Further, they also skewed the gene pool toward dark hair and eyes.



posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by punkinworks
reply to post by runetang
 


Kemet is poppycock,

And yes the ancient persians were caucasians.


Modern Persians are also Caucasians.

Harte



posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 04:35 PM
link   
reply to post by runetang
 


Yes youtube is full of these, they say they are the true israelites even though the bible clearly describes Moses, Solomon and king David as having a ruddy completion and long wavy hair.

Other then that they are the ancient Egyptians, the ancient Greeks, the moors who built Spain, the Japanese, the drividians in India, The original British, Irish and the south Americans....but one thing they want to distance themselves from is west Africa and its tribes.



posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 05:16 PM
link   
reply to post by runetang
 



The Irish are Scythians, according to their own history they are the descendents of the biblical magog who is the father of all Scythians.



Josephus identified the offspring of Magog as the Scythians, a name used in antiquity for peoples north of the Black Sea.[1] According to him, the Greeks called Scythia Magogia (Ant., bk. I, 6).


Also according to ancient Irish writings there was an island off the west cost of Ireland which extended northward. A huge flood sunk it and all the inhabitants in Ireland were also killed. Ireland was uninhabitable for 300 years according to the tradition and its survivors went walkabout for a bit (ie the mummies in china, also Celtic/Scythian) before returning back only to find others had settled the land....So according the Irish there was a mass exodus from this island into other parts of the world followed by a migration back to their homelands.

Modern archeologists only talk about the migration back, they never talk about the exodus out because then they would have to admit that Atlantis was a reality and a real memory!

What is the official explanation of red haired Celts building pyramids in china anyway?...I could do with a good laugh!


edit on 22-1-2013 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 07:51 PM
link   
Whoa don't know what happend here
edit on 22-1-2013 by punkinworks10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 08:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by LUXUS
reply to post by runetang
 



The Irish are Scythians, according to their own history they are the descendents of the biblical magog who is the father of all Scythians.



Josephus identified the offspring of Magog as the Scythians, a name used in antiquity for peoples north of the Black Sea.[1] According to him, the Greeks called Scythia Magogia (Ant., bk. I, 6).


Also according to ancient Irish writings there was an island off the west cost of Ireland which extended northward. A huge flood sunk it and all the inhabitants in Ireland were also killed. Ireland was uninhabitable for 300 years according to the tradition and its survivors went walkabout for a bit (ie the mummies in china, also Celtic/Scythian) before returning back only to find others had settled the land....So according the Irish there was a mass exodus from this island into other parts of the world followed by a migration back to their homelands.

Modern archeologists only talk about the migration back, they never talk about the exodus out because then they would have to admit that Atlantis was a reality and a real memory!

What is the official explanation of red haired Celts building pyramids in china anyway?...I could do with a good laugh!


edit on 22-1-2013 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)



The Irish are absolutely not scythians, the Celtic presence in Ireland goes back nearly 5000 years and they can trace their ancestry to maritime beaker culture of iberia( modern portugual). The scythians were a horse centric culture from the pontic steppes. They were as far from a maritime people as you could get.
There were no scythians in the British isle until the Romans brought them as mounted cavalry, in the later phases of the empire.
Their footprint is pretty clear, the Arthurian legends are an amalgamation of native Celtic lore and sycthian mythology.
It was scythian custom to mark a warriors grave with his sword thrust into the grave mound. This is where the whole sword in the stone mythology comes from. That combined with the scythian notion of an ancestral sword that legitimizes the claim to kingship is the basis for the arthurian legends.
edit on 22-1-2013 by punkinworks10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 08:22 PM
link   
reply to post by runetang
 





I have to say, the Bible does NOT speak of any Men existing before Adam. There were Sons of God, but not Sons of Men,


And that would be incorrect. Who did the sons of Adam marry and where did those people come from?



posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 08:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by hawkiye
reply to post by runetang
 





I have to say, the Bible does NOT speak of any Men existing before Adam. There were Sons of God, but not Sons of Men,


And that would be incorrect. Who did the sons of Adam marry and where did those people come from?

That's why you can't take the bible at face value. Also had a wife before eve, Lilith, and they had offspring as well.



posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 08:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Harte

Originally posted by punkinworks
reply to post by runetang
 


Kemet is poppycock,

And yes the ancient persians were caucasians.


Modern Persians are also Caucasians.

Harte

Yes they are essentially the definition of caucasian, being from the caucus region



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 04:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by punkinworks10
The Irish are absolutely not scythians, the Celtic presence in Ireland goes back nearly 5000 years and they can trace their ancestry to maritime beaker culture of iberia( modern portugual). The scythians were a horse centric culture from the pontic steppes. They were as far from a maritime people as you could get.
There were no scythians in the British isle until the Romans brought them as mounted cavalry, in the later phases of the empire.
Their footprint is pretty clear, the Arthurian legends are an amalgamation of native Celtic lore and sycthian mythology.
It was scythian custom to mark a warriors grave with his sword thrust into the grave mound. This is where the whole sword in the stone mythology comes from. That combined with the scythian notion of an ancestral sword that legitimizes the claim to kingship is the basis for the arthurian legends.
edit on 22-1-2013 by punkinworks10 because: (no reason given)


All their ancient text say they are, its not a modern claim, it goes back to the earliest writings of the Irish. They are a branch of Scythian s that eventually settled in Ireland





The whole Celtic race has been regarded as descended from Gomer, though history suggests modern Celts are descended from both Gomer and Magog. Archaeologists and ethnologists agree that the first Indo-European group to spread across Europe were Celts. The Irish Celts claim to be to the descendants of Magog, while the Welsh Celts claim to be to the descendants of Gomer. Irish chronicles, genealogies, plus an extensive number of manuscripts which have survived from ancient times, reveal their roots. The Irish were descendants of Scythians, also known as Magogians, which is strongly supported by etymological evidence. Archaeological evidence shows that both the Celts (from Gomer) and Scythians (from Magog) freely shared and mingled cultures at their earliest stages. Russian and eastern European excavations plainly reveal the blending of these two groups. Their geographical locations (what is now eastern Europe, southern Russia and Asia Minor) were referred to by the Greeks under the name of Celto-Scythae, which was populated by the Celts to the south and west, and the Scythians to the north. The ancient Greeks first called the northern peoples by the general name of Scythae; but when they became acquainted with the nations in the west, they began to call them by the different names of Celts, including the Celto-Scythae. Celts and Scythians were considered essentially the same peoples, based on geography, though many independent tribes of Celts and Scythians existed. The Latins called them "Galli," and the Romans referred to them as "Gauls." Later names used by Greeks were the Galatai or Galatae, Getae, Celtae and Keltoi. In the third century before Christ (about 280 B.C.), the Gauls invaded Rome and were ultimately repelled into Greece, where they migrated into the north-central part of Asia Minor (Anatolia). Known as fiercely independent peoples, they conquered the indigenous peoples of that region and established their own independent kingdom. The land became known as Galatia.
www.95live.ru...
edit on 23-1-2013 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 04:36 AM
link   
reply to post by punkinworks10
 





Ireland was not so much settled as it was invaded by numerous waves of Magogians that invaded the sacred isle over at least a thousand years' time. Each wave of these ancient ancestors of the Irish came and placed their unique brand on the land that would eventually become known as Ireland, displacing, but not erasing, the previous sons of Magog who had come to the sacred isle to seek out their destinies. "The history of Ireland is essentially a history of invasions. So, it was for good reason that the Irish monks who compiled the most ancient history of Ireland entitled their work Lebor Gabala Èrenn, “The Book of the Invasions of Ireland”. As we have seen, the vast majority of the invaders were Scythians or related peoples, all of whom had emigrated from Central Asia in ancient times to battle for control of “the island of the West”

ireland.mysteriousworld.com...




edit on 23-1-2013 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join


Help ATS Recover with your Donation.
read more: Help ATS Recover With Your Contribution