posted on Jul, 21 2008 @ 06:37 AM
So lately on youtube, this insistent african american fellow has been trying to debate my replies and comments and such to what is blatant racist
religious extremism, such as entire youtube videos with a black priest perpetrating a lie by saying something utterly retarded in all seriousness,
that white people are the "seed of the serpent" that are always going to have a problem with the "seed of adam" as it states in Genesis. You know,
really dehumanizing stuff.
Another current favorite of mine because it is so utterly retarded is that this guy claims that black people created white people, on an Island
off of Africa, which in those days, 8,000 years ago? Was called "Kemet". So these Kemetic blacks, were supposedly very advanced, Atlantis style
perhaps, and brought out the whiteness of the sperm manifest in the flesh through genetic tampering. I mean come the f*$@ on lol .. how silly can we
be. Of course there are others within this anti-white movement, not pro-black, but anti-white movement that have taken the Sumerian Anunnaki legends,
and now say black people ARE Anunnaki, and that those blacks currently living are the remnant of Anunnaki blood. They say they are our natural
overlords and creators, us being white people. Crazy huh?
Anyways, this is utterly ridiculous, im sorry. Sure, it may have been called Kemet. Sure, they may have had a marvelous empire. But no, they didn't
genetically modify human dna in the sperm and egg over 8,000years ago to "create" white people. It gets better, they say somehow in the creation, us
white folks came out super greedy, super evil, super materialistic, and were a scourge to all the ancient peoples, can you believe this! They say the
white people didn't originally ever inhabit Europe, that they were forced into exile into Europe for their totally bad behavior because, you know ..
we're all "white devils" inside right?
So I laugh at this and wanted to share. Onto better topics. it seems that in the Norse Mythology, it states Odin came from the land of Aeser, which
roughly translates into what Azerbaijan, north of Iran (a Caucasus Mts nation), used to be called back then, the land of Azer, or Aeser. Romans
arrived in Azeri land in 90ish A.D., and so some are claiming a migration of the ancient northern Persian/Azeri people northward and northwestward
into Russia and eventually Scandanavia. This is why the modern Iranians are related genetically to the ancient Iranians by hardly any percent at all,
as has been shown in testing about the origins and tracing of blond hair and blue eyes, or red hair and green eyes, except in the North. The percent
goes upward by many percents when you go into Azerbaijan.
My problem with this hypothesis is that the migration had to be earlier than that? Sure, Romans arriving makes sense, I'd want to leave too. And yes,
these were masters of the horse, the descendants of the 1st tribes to domesticate the horse as a means of transportation and war. So naturally,
these people would indeed travel much faster and farther than people who are migrating entirely on foot. I can see them also travelling along the
natural river routes, the same ones the Varangians traveled down to reach the Black Sea, except northward and northwestward initally to reach these
lands. The Northern portion of Azerbaijan is mountaneous and snowy, so I guess the harsh climate of Scandinavia and Russia, as well as travelling the
Steppes, wouldn't be so unknown to them? Perhaps peoples stopped along the way and raised farms, becoming the ancient ancestors of modern Ukrainians
and Southern Russians.
It's funny, in the early 1900's, lots of propaganda was being circulated by the Nazi's in Germany and the White Nationalists and those types of the
day. This propaganda stated that The Scandinavians and the North Germans were the "true" Aryans, that they were this master race of sorts, the
strongest, and that all the Europeans peoples descended from them and intermixed with other peoples, creating the present peoples and nations and the
differences they share in culture and appearance. On the flipside of the coin, they released propaganda stating Russians were sub-human, non-Aryan, of
Turkic stock, of all-Slavic stock, and that they were inferior peoples. There's evidence of Russians being ethnically cleansed en masse by various
groups and powers in WW2; even their own government and military.
But the truth, hidden as always, is closer to Russia being more of a homeland of "Nordic" caucasian white people/culture, as it had to have
been travelled through, and colonized by, the same people that eventually made it to Scandinavia, by this theory.. these same nomadic Indo-Iranian,
Indo-European Horse Masters, whom also had the plow.
One thing is for sure, white people weren't genetically created on Kermit the Frogman island off the coast of Africa in a botched genetic experiment,
can we all agree on this one?
[edit on 7/21/2008 by runetang]