It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cyberdude78
I happen to agree with the suggestion that we allow Russia to put their own defense shield up in Cuba with the same numbers as our base's in Eastern Europe. Ten missiles, all kinetic kill vehicles, that should be fair. This way neither shield would impede the other from a large nuclear strike, the US can defend against rogue nations, and Russia can be even with the US.
Strategic bombers on the other hand is something completely different. But what will really be problematic is if they put nukes in Cuba again. If that happens then all the agreements we agreed on in the last Cuban Missile Crisis go out the window, including our agreement not to invade Cuba.
Originally posted by manson_322
the russians should deploy subs,nukes and bombers in Cuba.
would give them excellent first strike capability to cripple the genocidal imperialist US empire
[edit on 21-7-2008 by manson_322]
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
One thing perhaps some of you aren't considering........ that is, that a world wide nuclear exchange won't be allowed.
The Watchers (the greys) with their superior technology just won't allow us to destroy this beautiful planet with nuclear weapons. Good thing for us. So something positive anyway.
But they won't prevent a conventional (non-nuclear) war from taking place.
Originally posted by carolina1737
Most would say that's impossible, however it could be done without the satellites seening them moving around. Imagine this..You dig out a huge mountain, say the size of Washington DC inside the beltway(Yamantu).....
A ground-based interceptor, designed to destroy incoming ICBMs, is lowered into its silo at the missile defense complex at Fort Greely, July 22, 2004.