It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mrwiffler
And why the hell does some knuckle head have to call it a battleship? Even if it were convincing footage of some flying craft why a battleship? Why not luxury liner or sanitation vessel?
Originally posted by sidmar
reply to post by Camilo1
LET ME ADD, THAT GUY WHOM WAS SPEAKING, LOOKS LIKE A LIAR. HE WAS GIVING THE LIAR TELLS. DO THIS, ASK ONE OF YOUR FRIENDS TO TELL YOU A TRUE STORY THAT HAPPEN. HE/SHE WILL NEED A MINUTE TO THINK ABOUT THE EVENT. AFTER THAT, THEY WILL NOT BE STOPPING AS MUCH, NOR LOOKING UP AND TO THEIR RIGHT JUST AS THE GUY IN THE VIDEO TELLING THE STORY DID. THAT GUY WAS SWEATING TOO MUCH FOR ME AND MIS-SAYING WORDS. ANOTHER THING I HATE ABOUT THESE UFO VIDEOS, IS THAT THE RESOLUTION SUCKS AND THE PERSON ALWAYS BE SO FAR FROM THE UFO. I CAN TELL VIDEOS ARE FAKE JUST BY BEING SO FAR FROM THE UFO AND THEN ZOOMING IN. EVERYONE KNOWS THAT ZOOMING IN, MAKES IT HARDER TO STAY ON THE TARGET AND IT MESSES UP THE RESOLUTION. A REAL PERSON RECORDING A REAL UFO, WILL PHYSICALLY MOVE CLOSER AND CLOSER TO THE OBJECT AND THAT PERSON WILL STAY RECORDING UNTIL THE OBJECT LEAVES. AND YOU WILL BE CALLING EVERYONE, YOUR FRIENDS, YOUR MOMMY, YOUR NEIGHBORS, EVERYONE.
in according to what the witness claimed, what we see cannot be fires in the hills:
unless he was on a very elevated position, but the angulation of the lamp would need to be explained, in this case: of course i can't rule it out, just pointing out the actual scenario of the sighting (IF it is), and i have to add that the perspective is (slightly) different.
Originally posted by Camilo1
As always your analysis is great, I´ve said this before and I´ll say it again, the owners of ATS are very lucky to have you around.
Originally posted by Lookingup
I've never understood why when these things are supposed to be visible for so long, the person filming doesn't drive/walk closer to it. I can promise you, if I see something like that, or something that goes down on the ground, I'm grabbing my camera, scared as I might be, and heading out there!
Originally posted by Spoodily
The "friend" is filming towards the streetlamp THROUGH a piece of clear glass. The "ufo" is a reflection of a lightsource that is actually coming from inside the same room as the cameraman. After watching the tape several times and especially the zoom in, zoom out sequence I started to see something familiar.
If you look closely, the misty stuff people are saying is smoke is actually a right hand held parallel to the floor. Count the number of lights and location in relation to the fingers on your hand. Notice how one seems like its dropped back in aboout the same position where a thumb would be? The lights that are being displayed are known as raver rings or light fingers, which ever method they used.
So anyway, I hope to see a better quality version of this but for now, it's the filmed reflection of a lightsource in a dark room to give the illusion of distance trick.
Originally posted by kidflash2008
reply to post by Spoodily
I just re-watched the video and agree it could be the reflection of a hand wearing those rings. The shape of the "object" is very much like a hand if one looks closely at the shape and not the lights. Good catch - I'm going to have to state this video is a hoax.